50 potential jurors in Trump porn case already dismissed saying they COULD NOT be impartial

As any real estate professional will tell you---your property is worth whatever the market will bear. Especially in today's market.
Yes, an appraisal or valuation is supposed to represent that market value.

Which is why Trump lied his ass off, because otherwise the values weren't high enough for the loan amounts and rates he was ultimately granted.
 
Yes, an appraisal or valuation is supposed to represent that market value.

Which is why Trump lied his ass off, because otherwise the values weren't high enough for the loan amounts and rates he was ultimately granted.
The lenders did not and do not make big loans using applicants value information
 
Wrong as always. Damn dude. This is just getting sad. You're embarrassing yourself.
Sonny boy I attended over 20 settlements of commercial and residential property over 2 million.
There is no bank that accepts a borrowers estimate of value. That estimate may be in some paperwork but the amount of the loan the lender will grant is derived from the appraisal they obtain to protect their own interests. Several loan officers and lending experienced have so stated. That just doesn’t match the way you wish it was.
You are a short bus with zero experience or fact knowledge of matters such as this.
 
Last edited:
What business record did he falsify? What's the underlying crime?
try and keep up...

stop regurgitating old shit.

Ken White: We know a lot more now about the D.A.’s theory of the case than we did before. There was a lot of speculation about whether the predicate crime — the one Trump was promoting by falsifying records — was going to be federal or state, and whether it was going to be campaign-finance related or election-interference related. Now the prosecutors have shown their hand, and their lead theory is going to be that Trump meant to interfere unlawfully with an election by concealing information that the voters might have considered. A case tends to look stronger after the prosecution picks a theory and commits to it. The evidence of deliberate falsification of records is going to be very strong.

 
Sonny boy I attended over 20 settlements of commercial and residential property over 2 million.
There is no bank that accepts a borrowers estimate of value. That estimate may be in some paperwork but the amount of the loan the lender will grant is derived from the appraisal they obtain to protect their own interests
You are a short bus with zero experience or fact knowledge of matters such as this.
I told my bank to loan me $5M because my home is worth $64M.

1713392731217.gif
 
try and keep up...

stop regurgitating old shit.

Ken White: We know a lot more now about the D.A.’s theory of the case than we did before. There was a lot of speculation about whether the predicate crime — the one Trump was promoting by falsifying records — was going to be federal or state, and whether it was going to be campaign-finance related or election-interference related. Now the prosecutors have shown their hand, and their lead theory is going to be that Trump meant to interfere unlawfully with an election by concealing information that the voters might have considered. A case tends to look stronger after the prosecution picks a theory and commits to it. The evidence of deliberate falsification of records is going to be very strong.

NYT?
Really?
 
NYT?
Really?
So, you're claiming this is not true -- what is written?

Ken White: We know a lot more now about the D.A.’s theory of the case than we did before. There was a lot of speculation about whether the predicate crime — the one Trump was promoting by falsifying records — was going to be federal or state, and whether it was going to be campaign-finance related or election-interference related. Now the prosecutors have shown their hand, and their lead theory is going to be that Trump meant to interfere unlawfully with an election by concealing information that the voters might have considered. A case tends to look stronger after the prosecution picks a theory and commits to it. The evidence of deliberate falsification of records is going to be very strong.
 
Americans are cheering for Trump because we all are aware of the Stalin tactics
"We"

You overestimate the size of your embarrassing cult.

But you will definitely be known by history for cheering the pussy grabbing fraudster. Our grandkids will read about your cult in history class.

"Hey, like grandpa!"
 
Last edited:
"But judgey boy found something that perturbed him being he knows nothing about the process-just like lib loons"
--------------------------------------------------------------

Well, I dunno if it was 'judgey boy' who found something perturb-able.
But I think the DA who brought the charges and is prosecuting the case.....it seems he did, indeed, find something to be perturbed about.

But, not unimportantly, he found it with the strong help of .....of.....well, of Michael Cohen.

And what he told the DA about Trump's practices checked out in the paperwork And checked out the private messaging between Cohen and his boss, Trump. Which brings us to a trial that we should expect to see that paperwork and emails.

So, I could be persuaded that there was something to be perturbed about.

IMHO
 
--------------------------------------------------------------

Well, I dunno if it was 'judgey boy' who found something perturb-able.
But I think the DA who brought the charges and is prosecuting the case.....it seems he did, indeed, find something to be perturbed about.

But, not unimportantly, he found it with the strong help of .....of.....well, of Michael Cohen.

And what he told the DA about Trump's practices checked out in the paperwork And checked out the private messaging between Cohen and his boss, Trump. Which brings us to a trial that we should expect to see that paperwork and emails.

So, I could be persuaded that there was something to be perturbed about.

IMHO
Generally when things are wrong it’s obvious and no persuasion or massaging is necessary
 
Generally when things are wrong it’s obvious and no persuasion or massaging is necessary
Having an insider who is integral....a 'co-conspirator', really......in an illegal scheme can be determinative if charges are ever brought.
Which seems to be the case here.
 

Forum List

Back
Top