47 Republicans vote in support of same sex marriage

[Lesh]

How about the people of Haiti, Jamaica or the Dominican Republic? Or the Liberal tyrants of Cuba? The Cuban people will accept living in squalor, eating garbage and people telling them what to do. But even the dictators of that island realize that Gay Marriage is a bridge too far.

Nope. I live in this country

 

[Polishprince]

Nope. I live in this country

And the people of America don't go for this shit either.

When it was placed on the ballot- even in ultraliberal California- it was crushed.

 

[Lesh]

And the people of America don't go for this shit either.

When it was placed on the ballot- even in ultraliberal California- it was crushed.

Back in 2008?

Times have changed

 

[Polishprince]

Back in 2008?

Times have changed

The Atrocity is now legal in America- that is undisputable.

However, its no more popular with the people. That's why libs had to go to a Far Left Supreme Court for a narrow decision, instead of presenting it to the electorate.

 

[Lesh]

The Atrocity is now legal in America- that is undisputable.

However, its no more popular with the people. That's why libs had to go to a Far Left Supreme Court for a narrow decision, instead of presenting it to the electorate.

Record-High 70% in U.S. Support Same-Sex Marriage

U.S. support for legal same-sex marriage continues to grow, now at 70% -- a new high in Gallup's trend dating to 1996.

news.gallup.com

SEVENTY PER CENT of Americans support gay marriage

You fuckers are the outliers

 

[JusticeHammer]

Wrong.

People like you are evil

You're a lib=delusional.

 

[Polishprince]

Record-High 70% in U.S. Support Same-Sex Marriage

U.S. support for legal same-sex marriage continues to grow, now at 70% -- a new high in Gallup's trend dating to 1996.

news.gallup.com

SEVENTY PER CENT of Americans support gay marriage

You fuckers are the outliers

If that was actually true, the libs would have let democracy take its course and have it voted in by the people.

But they didn't.

 

[Flash]

Republicans Squeezed Over Same-Sex Marriage Protections

GOP senators are dodging the question of whether to codify protections for marriage equality following the Supreme Court ruling overturning abortion rights.

www.huffpost.com

Republicans are out of step with the nation and catering to their homophobic base

You queers are pissed, aren't you?

 

[Lesh]

If that was actually true, the libs would have let democracy take its course and have it voted in by the people.

But they didn't.

No "if" about it retard

Your homophobia is NOT the norm

 

[Lesh]

You queers are pissed, aren't you?

Me? I'm straight. I just don't care who someone else loves

 

[Flash]

Me? I'm straight. I just don't care who someone else loves

Look, we don't really care. You don't have to hide it.

I think we all know that people that claim to be straight but defend the queers usually have some supressed homosexual tendencies.

To each his own.

 

[Polishprince]

Look, we don't really care. You don't have to hide it.

I think we all know that people that claim to be straight but defend the queers usually have some supressed homosexual tendencies.

To each his own.

I hate to say it, but you are right.

There are a lot of heterophobes out there, who are just scared they might be normative.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Amazing how Biden, Hillary, and 0bama ALL changed their 'core' positions on gay marriage in 2012. Principled people.

You people make me laugh. Like millions of other Americans, their views evolved over the last several. People learn, and grow. There are cultural shifts that most people are able to adapt to. People who were once considered pariahs come to be seen as human beings who are more alike than different from others. You people should try a little evolution least you go the way of the dinosaur

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Look, we don't really care. You don't have to hide it.

I think we all know that people that claim to be straight but defend the queers usually have some supressed homosexual tendencies.

To each his own.

Actually it is far more often that those who most vehemently deride gays are the ones who are in the closet or at least are harboring some insecurities

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Not according to his stooge, Mr. Axelrod. Axelrod said he lied, and it makes sense he would.

The people are opposed to this Atrocity, but he wanted to get elected. Once safely in, he pretended to change his mind.

I do not give a flying ****.

 

[Orangecat]

More like a Mindless Document... Our constitution is kind of awful.
The electoral college, the Senate, unelected judges making laws... it's kind of messed up.

Only a fool thinks the greatest contract ever enacted between government and the people is "kind of awful".
Are you that fool?

 

[Lesh]

Look, we don't really care. You don't have to hide it.

I think we all know that people that claim to be straight but defend the queers usually have some supressed homosexual tendencies.

To each his own.

We get that you think calling someone gay is an insult. Sadly I don't give a shit. Insults only work if the person insulted is actually...insulted

Oh and it's actually those who OPPOSE gays vehemently who are the closeted ones. Ya know ...like yourself for instance.

If someone supports gays and is gay...they aren't likely to hide it. Why would they...ya know...logically..

 

[OKTexas]

More inane bullshit that fails to address the point that I made or in any way defend your idiotic asertion that gays already had equal rights because they could marry someone of the opposite sex.

The fact that a license is needed does not make marriage a priveledge. Licenses serve various,purposes, In the case of marriage, it is to ensure that you are not marrying your mother or daughter and to ensure that it involves two consenting adults. Other than meeting a few basic requirements, marriahe is not soomething that must be earned, and it cannot be denied or taken away by the state. Until Obergefell narriage was treated as a right for opposite sex couples only. That was discrimintion

Yep, it was the law and everyone was treated equally under the law. That's not discrimination.

.

 

[Flash]

Actually it is far more often that those who most vehemently deride gays are the ones who are in the closet or at least are harboring some insecurities

We humans ridicule queers because, well, it is queer.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Yep, it was the law and everyone was treated equally under the law. That's not discrimination.

.

Really? Was everyone -gay and straight alike- able to marry the person who they are physically and romanticly attracted to? Yes or no?