- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,295
- 28,266
- 2,180
once a liar, always a liar. Nothing he says is credible.Yes. We know that because his testimony will fit seamlessly with the testimony of other witnesses like David Pecker's and everyone else's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
once a liar, always a liar. Nothing he says is credible.Yes. We know that because his testimony will fit seamlessly with the testimony of other witnesses like David Pecker's and everyone else's.
still hate america I see.LeftismMAGAtism is ignorant and foolish.
It is when it matches other testimony and the receiptsonce a liar, always a liar. Nothing he says is credible.
he could be lying to match it. See, that's the slope he's on. I know, your inability to see with common sense is your downfall.It is when it matches other testimony and the receipts
Problem (for you) is that he’s been saying the same thing for years.he could be lying to match it. See, that's the slope he's on. I know, your inability to see with common sense is your downfall.
then why did he lie under oath?Problem (for you) is that he’s been saying the same thing for years.
The evidence supports him
The New York attorney general’s lawyers objected to Donald Trump’s attorneys accusing Michael Cohen of committing perjury after Cohen acknowledged he lied to the judge who sentenced him in his 2018 federal case.It is when it matches other testimony and the receipts
except he's now a liar under oath. Credibility is gone. Sorry. I posted the lie.Everything he says is credible because it matches the documentary and testimonial evidence already on the record.
Well it’s up to the jury to decideexcept he's now a liar under oath. Credibility is gone. Sorry. I posted the lie.
yes it is. Doesn't change my facts. And I see you still can't accept he in fact lied. Right?Well it’s up to the jury to decide
Not you. Thankfully
Sure it is Ranger. Sure it is.Everything that Cohen has been saying is corroborated by documents and testimony.
man, they have no honor at all.Sure it is Ranger. Sure it is.
rebut what? that cohen is a habitual liar? sure he did.LaughatLeftists cannot rebut the prosecution case.
and lied under oath. ooops!Problem (for you) is that he’s been saying the same thing for years.
The evidence supports him
I doubt they're that incompetent. Rather, they are looking for a reversal on appeal, while also feeding the crowd at the ColiseumTrump denied second mistrial request, gag order change in hush money case
Former President Trump's legal team was denied two requests Thursday in his ongoing hush money criminal trial.
The big picture: Judge Juan Merchan rejected a mistrial motion two days after denying a similar request, and he declined to narrow a gag order to allow Trump to speak publicly about adult film actress and star witness Stormy Daniels following her testimony.
State of play: Daniels, whose allegations about an alleged sexual encounter with the former president are at the heart of the criminal trial, defended herself Thursday as Trump's attorneys often appeared to try to undermine her credibility by accusing her of story discrepancies.
https://www.axios.com/2024/05/09/trump-hush-money-mistrial-gag-order
- Trump's attorney Todd Blanche requested a mistrial, arguing some of her testimony, including details about an alleged sexual encounter, are unrelated to charges in the case and that her testimony was detrimental.
- Merchan rejected the defense's claim that Daniels' testimony differed from her previous accounts.
- The judge brought up specific issues with the defense's arguments, including that instead of denying the falsification of business records, they're denying the alleged sexual encounter Daniels spoke about, per the New York Times.
- "That in my mind allows the people to do what they can to rehabilitate her and to corroborate her story. Your motion for a mistrial is denied," Merchan said.
Merchan dressed down the defense's ridiculous request for a mistrial. A request made based on objections to "prejudicial" testimony given by Daniels. Merchan noted it was the defense's contention the sexual encounter never took place that allowed for Daniels to give detailed testimony about it. And that defense counsel passed on opportunities to object during the testimony if they took issue with it.
How does the incompetence of defense counsel work in Don's favor with respect to the court of public opinion? It allows Trump to accuse Merchan of bias, the most essential aspect of the defense to date. A claim no doubt amplified by RWM, who's job it is to reinforce the lies and disinformation Trump spews on a regular basis.
It's all part of a theme. How do you distract attention away from the commission of crimes? Claim our system of justice is corrupt and Trump is being persecuted. How do distract from an incompetent defense? Claim the judge is biased. How do you explain a lost election? Claim the system is rigged. Never accept responsibility for failure. Never admit defeat. Never admit to making mistakes. Sounds like a petulant child, or an authoritarian figure, not the leader of a constitutional republic.
it is amazing how it irritates the bajezus out of you!I doubt they're that incompetent. Rather, they are looking for a reversal on appeal, while also feeding the crowd at the Coliseum