John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,133
- 2,488
- Banned
- #81
General sense? ROTFLMFAO
You are a poopyhead! I win.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
General sense? ROTFLMFAO
You forget leftwing graft. We already know 2020 was stolen from Trump, who actually won in a landslide, so in 2024, you know the reality is Trump won in a mega-landslide.We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034
You can think those numbers matter all you want.
THEY DON'T
You forget leftwing graft. We already know 2020 was stolen from Trump, who actually won in a landslide, so in 2024, you know the reality is Trump won in a mega-landslide.
The racist gaslighting doesn't work anymore donkey.
He won. Period. Therefore, he has the mandate.
Learn how our system works. You won’t sound so stupid all the time that way.
LOL, keep looking for a general sense with AI, donkey. Someday you might just find it. LMAOYou are a poopyhead! I win.
More with the polls, eh donkey? They're almost as good as general sense.That's why the GOP and DonkeyDon are so low in the polls.![]()
hey dembot, you LOST, bigilyWe have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034
If the results say Trump won by 3, you know he won by 10.Below historical average margin of popular vote victory, a below historical average percentage of Electoral Votes won. That's how Trump did.
There is no "mandate". For either party. As much as both want to claim one whenever they win. The one "mandate" they have -- and ignore -- is that, in a closely-divided country, it's smarter to work together so that everyone has skin in the game.
We don't learn.
We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034
312>226Of course they do. You are a poopyhead, and I win.![]()
Translation: Trump's winning on everything and this is the best you've got.We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034
Sadly.Doubtful
Who's sleeping in the White House and signing Bills and EO's these days?That's why the GOP and DonkeyDon are so low in the polls.![]()

Who's sleeping in the White House and signing Bills and EO's these days?
Whether he won by one electoral college vote or by 538, he has all
the duties of a sitting president.
Now grow the **** up, John. This is unbecoming of you.![]()