Draining the swamp.

The Democratic party is famously corrupt and lies like water flows over Niagara Falls. Naturally we just laugh when those fools start yapping about Trump corruption.

You bunch of dumbasses need to get your story straight. First you say Trump can't tie is own shoes, then you claim he's so diabolically clever he steals billions of dollars in corrupt schemes so brilliant, the Clintons are envious. So which is it?
Tell you what. If in the next few days this scheme becomes a matter of public record will you condemn it or ill you do what people like you always do? Namely point to someone else and yell "hypocrisy" so you don't have to deal with what he does?
 
Tell you what. If in the next few days this scheme becomes a matter of public record will you condemn it or ill you do what people like you always do? Namely point to someone else and yell "hypocrisy" so you don't have to deal with what he does?
I'll just be here yawning, waiting for that to never happen. That's like waiting for Nancy Pelosi to get arrested for insider trading or Joe Biden to get arrested for taking bribes or the Clintons getting arrested for park benching people. :icon_rolleyes:
 
Amazing
95% of people are Stupid and Gullible .
Could it be that a few Munchers are starting to awaken?
And you're one of the special 5% who has everything all figured out, right ? You think ?
 

This is an interesting article. It's a partial accounting of Trump's recent actions that are openly corrupt. The numbers are based on public reporting, and I will gladly source any of them for those who try to claim the source is unreliable.

They run the gamut from selling pardons, to insider trading, and most egregiously, using the simple expediency of settling a lawsuit against a government agency through a settlement worth $1.7 billion. That's billion with a B. In a trust controlled by Trump that, while not able to pay money directly to him, is allowed to disperse funds to entities tied to him, like for instance the Trump Organization.

That last one I will elaborate on further, just to point out how utterly corrupt this stuff is.

The judge presiding over this case has asked to be briefed on may 20th on a technical but highly appropriate issue: namely, the doctrine of dominus litis, which bars cases where one party effectively controls both sides.

See, a lawsuit requires two parties actually in adversity to one another. Here, that's murky. So all of a sudden, the timing of this proposed settlement looks even more corrupt.

In a normal administration, the IRS, when being sued, would gladly argue that the lawsuit should be dismissed, and there's little doubt they would win on a myriad of grounds, both technical, (like this one) and on the merits.

For instance, it's hard to argue that the IRS is responsible for people leaking information, or that Trump suffered $10 billion, or even $1.7 billion, in damages.

But in this brave new world, the U.S. government would rather give away $1.7 billion to be dispersed as those people desire, without any meaningful oversight.

So my question is:
Who's willing to defend $1.7 billion of taxpayer money being given away this way?
Let us know when the Fund pays the Trump Organization, OK?
 
Back
Top Bottom