CO2 has ZERO impact on Climate...

[ding]

And endless repeat of fudged fraud as "evidence."

There is warming from the surface of growing urban areas. That is the only warming in the actual data. The highly correlated satellite and weather balloon data documented precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere for over 3 decades of rising Co2.


Anyone who uses the term "little Ice Age" is a science invalid moron who is completely wrong about the definition of ice age.

I've never met anyone who did not know what the little ice age was.

 

[EMH]

the current warming trend

is complete fudged fraud other than Urban Heat Island Effect, and the fact that Earth SAP is on a 60 year downtrend proves it.

No warming and no ongoing net ice melt.

 

[EMH]

I've never met anyone who did not know what the little ice age was.

It is wrong. A small blip of "cooling" from Oxygen isotope BS from one ice core in Greenland...

This is the correct definition of ice age...

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[ding]

is complete fudged fraud other than Urban Heat Island Effect, and the fact that Earth SAP is on a 60 year downtrend proves it.

No warming and no ongoing net ice melt.

So you are arguing the current warming trend did not begin at the end of the little ice age?

Do you deny the little ice age - which was a prolonged cold spell and not a glacial period - happened?

https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-milj...594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/DP1007.pdf

 

[ding]

It is wrong. A small blip of "cooling" from Oxygen isotope BS from one ice core in Greenland...

This is the correct definition of ice age...

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

There were people living then, dummy.

In world history, the "Little Ice Age" refers to a period of significantly cooler global temperatures that occurred roughly between the 14th and 19th centuries, impacting agriculture, societies, and settlement patterns across the Northern Hemisphere, particularly in Europe, where it is often associated with harsher winters and shorter growing seasons, leading to food shortages and social unrest; it followed the Medieval Warm Period and preceded the current warming trend.

Are you saying this didn't happen?

 

[EMH]

the current warming trend

is 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD, not happening, and SAP proves it.

 

[EMH]

which was a prolonged cold spell

For ONE SPOT ON GREENLAND ONLY, assuming you accept Oxygen isotope ratio as an accurate indicator of past temp in a given year, which in and of itself is laughable.

 

[EMH]

the "Little Ice Age" refers to a period of significantly cooler global temperatures that occurred roughly between the 14th and 19th centuries, impacting agriculture, societies, and settlement patterns across the Northern Hemisphere, particularly in Europe

.... ONLY IN EUROPE, with NO HARD DATA, and nothing but "people said it was cold" according to Co2 FRAUD.


Whether or not Earth is warming is really all about how much ice is on Earth, and whether it is increasing or decreasing. Since North American Ice Age went out 10k years ago, 97% of Earth ice on Greenland and Antarctica has grown, every year, including THIS YEAR and LAST YEAR, and that is why...

1. Co2 FRAUD cannot show us one single photo of "ocean rise"
2. Because THERE IS NO OCEAN RISE
3. because EARTH IS NOT WARMING
4. and Earth is not experiencing an ongoing net ice melt
5. because if Earth was warming and experiencing an ongoing net ice melt, SAP would rise, but instead for the past 60 years it has gone down slightly...

 

[ding]

is 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD, not happening, and SAP proves it.

For ONE SPOT ON GREENLAND ONLY, assuming you accept Oxygen isotope ratio as an accurate indicator of past temp in a given year, which in and of itself is laughable.

.... ONLY IN EUROPE, with NO HARD DATA, and nothing but "people said it was cold" according to Co2 FRAUD.


Whether or not Earth is warming is really all about how much ice is on Earth, and whether it is increasing or decreasing. Since North American Ice Age went out 10k years ago, 97% of Earth ice on Greenland and Antarctica has grown, every year, including THIS YEAR and LAST YEAR, and that is why...

1. Co2 FRAUD cannot show us one single photo of "ocean rise"
2. Because THERE IS NO OCEAN RISE
3. because EARTH IS NOT WARMING
4. and Earth is not experiencing an ongoing net ice melt
5. because if Earth was warming and experiencing an ongoing net ice melt, SAP would rise, but instead for the past 60 years it has gone down slightly...

In world history, the "Little Ice Age" refers to a period of significantly cooler global temperatures that occurred roughly between the 14th and 19th centuries, impacting agriculture, societies, and settlement patterns across the Northern Hemisphere, particularly in Europe, where it is often associated with harsher winters and shorter growing seasons, leading to food shortages and social unrest; it followed the Medieval Warm Period and preceded the current warming trend.

 

[EMH]

to a period of significantly cooler global temperatures that

... has precisely NO ACTUAL DATA to support it other than words from Europe an one ice core from Greenland.

 

[ding]

... has precisely NO ACTUAL DATA to support it other than words from Europe an one ice core from Greenland.

Tons of data.

 

[EMH]

Tons of data.

FUDGE is not DATA.

Take the Atmosphere. You, as a paid employee of Co2 FRAUD, accept there is "warming" in the atmosphere.

The DATA never said that.

Only FUDGE says that...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[ding]

FUDGE is not DATA.

Take the Atmosphere. You, as a paid employee of Co2 FRAUD, accept there is "warming" in the atmosphere.

The DATA never said that.

Only FUDGE says that...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

The data is overwhelming and indisputable.

 

[ding]

FUDGE is not DATA.

Take the Atmosphere. You, as a paid employee of Co2 FRAUD, accept there is "warming" in the atmosphere.

The DATA never said that.

Only FUDGE says that...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

BUT BUT BUT hurricanes and land moving back and forth over the polar regions... and Jews.

That's YOUR kind of evidence.

 

[EMH]

The data is overwhelming and indisputable.

FUDGE is NOT DATA.

There is NO DATA to support the theory at all. Adding Co2 to the atmosphere did not warm the atmosphere. That's THE DATA.

What you support is a theory where the ACTUAL DATA refuted it, so it was FUDGED.

That is "climate science" today....

 

[EMH]

BUT BUT BUT hurricanes and land moving back and forth over the polar regions... and Jews.

That's YOUR kind of evidence.

Hurricane data is hard to fudge, since it has been around a while.

If oceans were warming, hurricanes would be more and greater, but that is not the case. And your side cannot "fudge" that away.

For example, the last time a Cat 5 got as far north as Martha's Vineyard was 1938, and no Cat 5 has gotten that far north since.

Ocean "warming" is FUDGED FRAUD just like the entire Co2 FRAUD.

 

[ding]

Hurricane data is hard to fudge, since it has been around a while.

If oceans were warming, hurricanes would be more and greater, but that is not the case. And your side cannot "fudge" that away.

For example, the last time a Cat 5 got as far north as Martha's Vineyard was 1938, and no Cat 5 has gotten that far north since.

Ocean "warming" is FUDGED FRAUD just like the entire Co2 FRAUD.

It's seasonal weather that doesn't go back very far in time to be helpful for anything. It's as dumb as the rest of your idiotic beliefs.

 

[ding]

FUDGE is NOT DATA.

There is NO DATA to support the theory at all. Adding Co2 to the atmosphere did not warm the atmosphere. That's THE DATA.

What you support is a theory where the ACTUAL DATA refuted it, so it was FUDGED.

That is "climate science" today....

Your idea of data is pictures of the statue of liberty taken from different angles.

 

[EMH]

Your idea of data is pictures of the statue of liberty taken from different angles.

You have NO PHOTOS from anywhere on Earth, except for islands in South Pacific approaching Pacific Ring of Fire, of land sinking....


NONE

NONE FROM

North America
South America
Asia
Africa
Greenland
Antarctica
Australia


nothing...

and we know why and SAP proves why

Earth is not warming and there is no ongoing net ice melt.

 

[ding]

You have NO PHOTOS from anywhere on Earth, except for islands in South Pacific approaching Pacific Ring of Fire, of land sinking....


NONE

NONE FROM

North America
South America
Asia
Africa
Greenland
Antarctica
Australia


nothing...

and we know why and SAP proves why

Earth is not warming and there is no ongoing net ice melt.

There's real data that says otherwise.