CO2 has ZERO impact on Climate...

[daveman]

Pretty much like all MAGAs.
One simple made up lie that’s suppose to justify the exclusion of work of thousands of climate scientists. Obviously, you’re science illiterate and worse, you’re politically illiterate. .

You don't want me to think for myself. That's the very last thing you want.

No, you want me to join you in parroting your cult's dogma.

Not gonna happen, Skippy.

And your strategy of getting normal people to convert by the threat of calling them names on an anonymous internet message board...how many converts have you gained?

By my count...zero.

You really suck at this.

 

[daveman]

Find one who isn't....

Not how it works. You made the claim, you back it up.

And no, "they get angry with me!" is not proof they're Jews.

 

[Dagosa]

You don't want me to think for myself. That's the very last thing you want.

No, you want me to join you in parroting your cult's dogma.

Not gonna happen, Skippy.

And your strategy of getting normal people to convert by the threat of calling them names on an anonymous internet message board...how many converts have you gained?

By my count...zero.

You really suck at this.

You’re delusional as usual.
Do you think for yourself if your car breaks down or you have bleeding episode in your rectum. No bubba, any sane person goes to a mechanic and a doctor. But of course you bubbas are insane. You bubbas just parrot Trump and his other minions. None know wtf they are talking about .
Yes dufus, I parrot NASA and the thousands of climate science research facilities, and you parrot idiots. It’s apparent to sane people who the idiots are. Btw, I personally don’t give a shit what MAGAs think or do. But their bullshit is answered.

 

[EMH]

Not how it works. You made the claim, you back it up.

And no, "they get angry with me!" is not proof they're Jews.

LOL!!!

Like you, they all claim this is a 757





Now, if you have some ability in science, and you claim that is a 757.... you love Dick Cheney and W and you support Kamala, which THEY ALL DO...


It is fascinating that two of the biggest chosen liars in Enviro, Toddster and Ding, both claim to be "skeptics," cannot refute one word EMH posts, and parrot all the fudged fraud the Co2 FRAUD uses to claim "warming" that does not exist....

There is a pattern here. It is a pattern that America cannot seem to get anything right about basic things science, at the top levels...

911
Covid
Co2 FRAUd
Murderous Fraud Vax


and that is all because that specific demographic has too much influence.

 

[mamooth]

"Applications in Engineering Science"?

Scam!

Honest people don't try to publish papers in journals that have nothing to do with the topic being discussed. Dishonest people try that stunt because they know the reviewers are clueless about the topic.

The paper was ... just dumb. It was technobabble nonsense, and the authors didn't know the basics of climate science.

However, it did set off the denier howler monkeys, which was kind of the point.

Needless to say, none of the deniers understand the paper. Their cult told them it was good, and, with most of them being as brainless and brainwashed as Frank here, none of them even saw a need to look at the paper.

If any of the denier crowd disagrees, they should summarize the paper for us. In their own words, not just doing a copy-and-paste of the abstract. If they can't, they prove my point. Needless to say, none of them can.

Frank, this is where you robotically chant that no one else can think, just as you were instructed to do, thus causing everyone to laugh even harder at you. Please proceed. But first explain to us why you think the author submitted the paper to an unknown Civil Engineering journal.

Oh, this.

FACT-CHECK: No, a new study doesn’t claim CO2 has no effect on Global warming

Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff recently asserted in a tweet that a new peer-reviewed study provides “Decisive evidence that CO2 is not the cause of any global warming whatsoever.” The study in...

www.electifacts.eu

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL!!!

Like you, they all claim this is a 757





Now, if you have some ability in science, and you claim that is a 757.... you love Dick Cheney and W and you support Kamala, which THEY ALL DO...


It is fascinating that two of the biggest chosen liars in Enviro, Toddster and Ding, both claim to be "skeptics," cannot refute one word EMH posts, and parrot all the fudged fraud the Co2 FRAUD uses to claim "warming" that does not exist....

There is a pattern here. It is a pattern that America cannot seem to get anything right about basic things science, at the top levels...

911
Covid
Co2 FRAUd
Murderous Fraud Vax


and that is all because that specific demographic has too much influence.

It is a 757.

Still looking for evidence it wasn't?

 

[ding]

LOL!!!

Yeah, that gets you from 1.0 bars to 1.2, and you need to get to 3 to 5 bars.

To get there, you need the gas trapped in AA and Greenland released into the atmosphere.

Actually it doesn't, you dumbass. Increased water vapor lowers atmospheric pressure. I only said that it increased it to set your dumb ass up.

 

[EMH]

Increased water vapor lowers atmospheric pressure.

Adding any molecules to the atmosphere increases surface air pressure.

 

[ding]

Adding any molecules to the atmosphere increases surface air pressure.

Try googling it for an explanation, dummy.

 

[Dagosa]

Try googling it for an explanation, dummy.

Excessive co2 levels definitely lowers the intellect of deniers.,

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Excessive co2 levels definitely lowers the intellect of deniers.,

It isn't helping you green idiots either.

 

[ding]

Excessive co2 levels definitely lowers the intellect of deniers.,

I don't know how when the pre and post industrial revolution temperature correlations don't match. Does post industrial revolution possess magical properties that pre-industrial revolution CO2 didn't possess?

 

[EMH]

Excessive co2 levels definitely lowers the intellect of deniers.,

There is no actual data supporting the theory that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming.... only FUDGE.

 

[ding]

There is no actual data supporting the theory that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming.... only FUDGE.

And simple physics. They are over stating it. Your denial isn't helping. You speak gibberish, your posts are incoherent and your logic is that of a moron.

 

[EMH]

There is DATA and there is FUDGE.

The DATA from highly correlated satellites and balloons showed NO WARMING while Co2 was rising for decades.

We could increase atmospheric Co2 10 fold from current levels and it would still do NOTHING.

 

[ding]

There is DATA and there is FUDGE.

The DATA from highly correlated satellites and balloons showed NO WARMING while Co2 was rising for decades.

We could increase atmospheric Co2 10 fold from current levels and it would still do NOTHING.

You speak gibberish. Go make me a ham sandwich.

 

[EMH]

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling




There is NO ACTUAL DATA that shows increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming, JUST FUDGE.

 

[ding]

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling




There is NO ACTUAL DATA that shows increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming, JUST FUDGE.

Surface temperature is not cooling. It's been warming since the end of the little ice age.

https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-milj...594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/DP1007.pdf

 

[EMH]

And endless repeat of fudged fraud as "evidence."

There is warming from the surface of growing urban areas. That is the only warming in the actual data. The highly correlated satellite and weather balloon data documented precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere for over 3 decades of rising Co2.


Anyone who uses the term "little Ice Age" is a science invalid moron who is completely wrong about the definition of ice age.

 

[ding]

And endless repeat of fudged fraud as "evidence."

There is warming from the surface of growing urban areas. That is the only warming in the actual data. The highly correlated satellite and weather balloon data documented precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere for over 3 decades of rising Co2.


Anyone who uses the term "little Ice Age" is a science invalid moron who is completely wrong about the definition of ice age.

So you are arguing the current warming trend did not begin at the end of the little ice age?

Do you deny the little ice age - which was a prolonged cold spell and not a glacial period - happened?