3/5 Of A Human Being

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
77,575
Reaction score
8,749
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
77,575
Reaction score
8,749
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
168
Points
140
" Racist CPA Lying About Citizenship Requirements "

* Subject To Jurisdiction Stipulation *

Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
You neglected , obviously out of bias and ignorance to include " subject to the jurisdiction thereof " which the children of non jurisdiction migrants are not and are therefore citizens from the country of their parent .
 

Unkotare

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
92,616
Reaction score
9,025
Points
2,015
" Racist CPA Lying About Citizenship Requirements "

* Subject To Jurisdiction Stipulation *

Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
You neglected , obviously out of bias and ignorance to include " subject to the jurisdiction thereof " which the children of non jurisdiction migrants are not and are therefore citizens from the country of their parent .
You are wrong, no matter how many times you repeat this nonsense.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
Damn you're ignorant
the organized militia which is the national guard is under the control of the government
The unorganized militia is not
lol. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States, it says so in the first clause. Individuals of the People are subject to the Police Power of a State. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free State. The riots are Proof of why we need gun control laws for Individuals.
the organized milita state guard dictates you no longer have a free state and are under their rule
The riots are proof of why we need gun control??????? how do you stop rioters from harming you when the police are told to stand down?
Tell you what you do go live in one of those leftists controlled blue cities
FYI gun control violates second amendment rights to a free state
Our Second Amendment declares otherwise. There is no reason to believe anyone on the right wing claiming the opposite. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems. It is a simple ratio of organized militia to unorganized militia. If our State legislators were doing their job, we should have no riots only peaceful protests and petitions for redress of grievances because our First Amendment is First not Second.

A free State is not about Individual Liberty to bear Arms but about what is necessary to achieve the goal and objective to good Order, security. Our First Amendment and State equivalents are what a free State is about. Order not Chaos.

That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
Any Person born in the US after 1808 is a US citizen. If one Person can be, any Person can be.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Our federal Constitution is our supreme law of the land not federal laws enacted by Congress or State legislators.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
lol. The South was more organized, and they should have used our First Amendment simply because it is First not Second. Eminent domain could have solved their problem without their useless rebellion.
You need to study up on tyrannical governments King George said you didn't have a second amendment right
What King George said no longer mattered to US citizens under our republican form of Government after 1776. We have a First Amendment and it is First not Second.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
Sorry if I haven't dumbed it down enough for right wingers; it can be challenge sometimes.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Your appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land is meaningless.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Racist CPA Lying About Citizenship Requirements "

* Subject To Jurisdiction Stipulation *

Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
You neglected , obviously out of bias and ignorance to include " subject to the jurisdiction thereof " which the children of non jurisdiction migrants are not and are therefore citizens from the country of their parent .
Subject to US jurisdiction means if the police power applies they are subject to US jurisdiction. Following your line of reasoning means current illegals would need to be treated more like ambassadors.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
77,575
Reaction score
8,749
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
Any Person born in the US after 1808 is a US citizen. If one Person can be, any Person can be.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Our federal Constitution is our supreme law of the land not federal laws enacted by Congress or State legislators.
that is a lie slaves born in America and free blacks did not have citizenship rights until the civil rights act of 1866
THE CONSTITUTION WASN'T AMENDED UNTIL THE 13TH AMENDMENT WAS ADDED
SO YOUR BULLSHIT ABOUT 1808 JUST DOESN'T EXIST
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
77,575
Reaction score
8,749
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
Sorry if I haven't dumbed it down enough for right wingers; it can be challenge sometimes.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Your appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land is meaningless.
blacks and slaves did not have citizenship rights until the civil rights act of 1866
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
77,575
Reaction score
8,749
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
Damn you're ignorant
the organized militia which is the national guard is under the control of the government
The unorganized militia is not
lol. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States, it says so in the first clause. Individuals of the People are subject to the Police Power of a State. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free State. The riots are Proof of why we need gun control laws for Individuals.
the organized milita state guard dictates you no longer have a free state and are under their rule
The riots are proof of why we need gun control??????? how do you stop rioters from harming you when the police are told to stand down?
Tell you what you do go live in one of those leftists controlled blue cities
FYI gun control violates second amendment rights to a free state
Our Second Amendment declares otherwise. There is no reason to believe anyone on the right wing claiming the opposite. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems. It is a simple ratio of organized militia to unorganized militia. If our State legislators were doing their job, we should have no riots only peaceful protests and petitions for redress of grievances because our First Amendment is First not Second.

A free State is not about Individual Liberty to bear Arms but about what is necessary to achieve the goal and objective to good Order, security. Our First Amendment and State equivalents are what a free State is about. Order not Chaos.

That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
you're ignornt
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
Any Person born in the US after 1808 is a US citizen. If one Person can be, any Person can be.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Our federal Constitution is our supreme law of the land not federal laws enacted by Congress or State legislators.
that is a lie slaves born in America and free blacks did not have citizenship rights until the civil rights act of 1866
THE CONSTITUTION WASN'T AMENDED UNTIL THE 13TH AMENDMENT WAS ADDED
SO YOUR BULLSHIT ABOUT 1808 JUST DOESN'T EXIST
Only Because of immoral right wingers being unable to faithfully execute our supreme law of the land. You are simply appealing to ignorance of the law, like usual. Any illegal can do that; but right wingers are immoral enough to only complain about the less fortunate under our form of Capitalism.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
Sorry if I haven't dumbed it down enough for right wingers; it can be challenge sometimes.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Your appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land is meaningless.
blacks and slaves did not have citizenship rights until the civil rights act of 1866
Due to right wing immorality and unfaithful execution of the laws. Any infidel could be a right winger.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
Damn you're ignorant
the organized militia which is the national guard is under the control of the government
The unorganized militia is not
lol. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States, it says so in the first clause. Individuals of the People are subject to the Police Power of a State. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free State. The riots are Proof of why we need gun control laws for Individuals.
the organized milita state guard dictates you no longer have a free state and are under their rule
The riots are proof of why we need gun control??????? how do you stop rioters from harming you when the police are told to stand down?
Tell you what you do go live in one of those leftists controlled blue cities
FYI gun control violates second amendment rights to a free state
Our Second Amendment declares otherwise. There is no reason to believe anyone on the right wing claiming the opposite. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems. It is a simple ratio of organized militia to unorganized militia. If our State legislators were doing their job, we should have no riots only peaceful protests and petitions for redress of grievances because our First Amendment is First not Second.

A free State is not about Individual Liberty to bear Arms but about what is necessary to achieve the goal and objective to good Order, security. Our First Amendment and State equivalents are what a free State is about. Order not Chaos.

That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
you're ignornt
You are simply clueless and Causeless.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
77,575
Reaction score
8,749
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
Any Person born in the US after 1808 is a US citizen. If one Person can be, any Person can be.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Our federal Constitution is our supreme law of the land not federal laws enacted by Congress or State legislators.
that is a lie slaves born in America and free blacks did not have citizenship rights until the civil rights act of 1866
THE CONSTITUTION WASN'T AMENDED UNTIL THE 13TH AMENDMENT WAS ADDED
SO YOUR BULLSHIT ABOUT 1808 JUST DOESN'T EXIST
Only Because of immoral right wingers being unable to faithfully execute our supreme law of the land. You are simply appealing to ignorance of the law, like usual. Any illegal can do that; but right wingers are immoral enough to only complain about the less fortunate under our form of Capitalism.
I thought you leftists always claimed the founders were liberals? Make up your mind sport.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
77,575
Reaction score
8,749
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
Damn you're ignorant
the organized militia which is the national guard is under the control of the government
The unorganized militia is not
lol. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States, it says so in the first clause. Individuals of the People are subject to the Police Power of a State. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free State. The riots are Proof of why we need gun control laws for Individuals.
the organized milita state guard dictates you no longer have a free state and are under their rule
The riots are proof of why we need gun control??????? how do you stop rioters from harming you when the police are told to stand down?
Tell you what you do go live in one of those leftists controlled blue cities
FYI gun control violates second amendment rights to a free state
Our Second Amendment declares otherwise. There is no reason to believe anyone on the right wing claiming the opposite. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems. It is a simple ratio of organized militia to unorganized militia. If our State legislators were doing their job, we should have no riots only peaceful protests and petitions for redress of grievances because our First Amendment is First not Second.

A free State is not about Individual Liberty to bear Arms but about what is necessary to achieve the goal and objective to good Order, security. Our First Amendment and State equivalents are what a free State is about. Order not Chaos.

That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
you're ignornt
You are simply clueless and Causeless.
says the idiot that doesn't know what a nanny state is and didn't know slaves and blacks before 1866 had no citizenship rights.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
No they weren't you keep repeating this stupid shit without showing any proof. You keep referencing the year 1808 that year referencing to the electoral college
the Constitution became law of the land in 1789 the 1790 census only white males had rights
Slaves did not have citizenship rights until 1866
Any Person born in the US after 1808 is a US citizen. If one Person can be, any Person can be.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Our federal Constitution is our supreme law of the land not federal laws enacted by Congress or State legislators.
that is a lie slaves born in America and free blacks did not have citizenship rights until the civil rights act of 1866
THE CONSTITUTION WASN'T AMENDED UNTIL THE 13TH AMENDMENT WAS ADDED
SO YOUR BULLSHIT ABOUT 1808 JUST DOESN'T EXIST
Only Because of immoral right wingers being unable to faithfully execute our supreme law of the land. You are simply appealing to ignorance of the law, like usual. Any illegal can do that; but right wingers are immoral enough to only complain about the less fortunate under our form of Capitalism.
I thought you leftists always claimed the founders were liberals? Make up your mind sport.
Our Founding Fathers liberal enough to create our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Nothing about slavery in our federal Constitution. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from Inception.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
57,773
Reaction score
1,745
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
Damn you're ignorant
the organized militia which is the national guard is under the control of the government
The unorganized militia is not
lol. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States, it says so in the first clause. Individuals of the People are subject to the Police Power of a State. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free State. The riots are Proof of why we need gun control laws for Individuals.
the organized milita state guard dictates you no longer have a free state and are under their rule
The riots are proof of why we need gun control??????? how do you stop rioters from harming you when the police are told to stand down?
Tell you what you do go live in one of those leftists controlled blue cities
FYI gun control violates second amendment rights to a free state
Our Second Amendment declares otherwise. There is no reason to believe anyone on the right wing claiming the opposite. We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems. It is a simple ratio of organized militia to unorganized militia. If our State legislators were doing their job, we should have no riots only peaceful protests and petitions for redress of grievances because our First Amendment is First not Second.

A free State is not about Individual Liberty to bear Arms but about what is necessary to achieve the goal and objective to good Order, security. Our First Amendment and State equivalents are what a free State is about. Order not Chaos.

That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
you're ignornt
You are simply clueless and Causeless.
says the idiot that doesn't know what a nanny state is and didn't know slaves and blacks before 1866 had no citizenship rights.
You are simply too dumb to understand; I have to work hard to try to dumb it down for the Right Wing.

Anyone born in the US after 1808 was supposed to be a Citizen. Why do you believe the North was gradually emancipating their slave population?
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top