3/5 Of A Human Being

Nosmo King

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
25,815
Reaction score
6,768
Points
290
Location
Buckle of the Rust Belt
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,577
Reaction score
9,502
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
God given rights not the rights that are given and taken away by democrats
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
100,241
Reaction score
34,228
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
What does it matter? This happens to be 2020! Women weren't allowed to vote in 1866! Do you want 1866 governance for a 2020 nation?
It matters when states are getting representation for people they should not be getting iLLEGALS SHOULD BE COUNTED AS 3/5
Undocumented immigrants cannot vote!


You're certainly thick with lies today


"Nevada Sec. State: DMV Instructed Employees To Register Non-Citizens To Vote

“It has come to our attention that when offering voter registration opportunities to customers, DMV’s employees offer voter registration materials to DMV customers whom they know to be non-citizens based upon their presentation of a Green Card for identification purposes,” Cegavske wrote."





“More specifically, it is our understanding that some DMV employees have been instructed to accept registration materials from all customers, including those who present a Green Card for identification purposes…"


"New Report Exposes Thousands of Illegal Votes in 2016 Election
A new bombshell study released by the Government Accountability Institute shows ....that thousands of votes in the 2016 election were illegal duplicate votes from people who registered and voted in more than one state.

The probability of 45,000 illegal duplicate votes is the low end of the spectrum, and it does not even account for other types of fraud such as ineligible voting by noncitizens and felons and absentee ballot fraud.

....duplicate voting and voter fraud are a real problem that can have serious consequential effects."
New Report Exposes Thousands of Illegal Votes in 2016 Election

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

" Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.” Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch


"Hundreds of Illegal Voters Revealed in Philadelphia
According to a Philadelphia elections official, hundreds of individuals who are not U.S. citizens have registered to vote in Philadelphia and nearly half of them voted in past elections. Since 2006, 317 registered voters have contacted the City Commissioners, which oversees Philadelphia elections, asking that their registrations be canceled because they are not citizens.

Philly.com reported that many of them registered while either applying for or renewing their driver’s licenses."
Hundreds of Illegal Voters Revealed in Philadelphia


Hmmmm.....

"....many of them registered while either applying for or renewing their driver’s licenses."

Remember when I posted this....

a. "12 States (and DC) That Allow Driver's Licenses for People in the Country Illegally" 12 States (and DC) That Allow Driver's Licenses for People in the Country Illegally - Illegal Immigration - ProCon.org



b. "If you’ve visited the DMV in the last few weeks, you may have noticed that you can now complete your voter registration at the same time you renew your driver’s license — without having to fill out a separate form.... they will be registered as having no party preference. " Registered to vote at the DMV? Check again. Many who use the new process miss a vital step two



Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review





Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review[/QUOTE]
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
lol. Right wingers believe in less in equal rights.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.
Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.
Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.
Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.
Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.
You're ignoring a lot of things
I am not the one ignoring express Constitutional law and whining about it.
post your sources
Our Constitution. Show us Any gender or race terms in our Original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Anything gender or race specific happened after that, because right wingers could not obey our own laws.
show me where slaves or blacks had citizenship before the ratification of the 14th amendment and the creation of the civil rights act of 1866?
lol. We know why right wingers did not vote Republican before our Civil War. Equality and equal protection of the laws has always been difficult for the right wing.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
They only have false witness bearing and practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) to try to confuse the issue. Yet, they are also willing to allege to be the, party of God. Go figure.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
God given rights not the rights that are given and taken away by democrats
Persons who believe in God should not be immoral enough to bear false witness or practice the abomination of hypocrisy.

Not bright enough to insist on equality and equal protection of the laws or is that concept too difficult for the right wing.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
What does it matter? This happens to be 2020! Women weren't allowed to vote in 1866! Do you want 1866 governance for a 2020 nation?
It matters when states are getting representation for people they should not be getting iLLEGALS SHOULD BE COUNTED AS 3/5
Undocumented immigrants cannot vote!


You're certainly thick with lies today


"Nevada Sec. State: DMV Instructed Employees To Register Non-Citizens To Vote

“It has come to our attention that when offering voter registration opportunities to customers, DMV’s employees offer voter registration materials to DMV customers whom they know to be non-citizens based upon their presentation of a Green Card for identification purposes,” Cegavske wrote."





“More specifically, it is our understanding that some DMV employees have been instructed to accept registration materials from all customers, including those who present a Green Card for identification purposes…"


"New Report Exposes Thousands of Illegal Votes in 2016 Election
A new bombshell study released by the Government Accountability Institute shows ....that thousands of votes in the 2016 election were illegal duplicate votes from people who registered and voted in more than one state.

The probability of 45,000 illegal duplicate votes is the low end of the spectrum, and it does not even account for other types of fraud such as ineligible voting by noncitizens and felons and absentee ballot fraud.

....duplicate voting and voter fraud are a real problem that can have serious consequential effects."
New Report Exposes Thousands of Illegal Votes in 2016 Election

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

" Judicial Watch noted that public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission’s 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey and through verbal accounts from various county agencies show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).

In the letter, Judicial Watch noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.” Judicial Watch Warns California to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit - Judicial Watch


"Hundreds of Illegal Voters Revealed in Philadelphia
According to a Philadelphia elections official, hundreds of individuals who are not U.S. citizens have registered to vote in Philadelphia and nearly half of them voted in past elections. Since 2006, 317 registered voters have contacted the City Commissioners, which oversees Philadelphia elections, asking that their registrations be canceled because they are not citizens.

Philly.com reported that many of them registered while either applying for or renewing their driver’s licenses."
Hundreds of Illegal Voters Revealed in Philadelphia


Hmmmm.....

"....many of them registered while either applying for or renewing their driver’s licenses."

Remember when I posted this....

a. "12 States (and DC) That Allow Driver's Licenses for People in the Country Illegally" 12 States (and DC) That Allow Driver's Licenses for People in the Country Illegally - Illegal Immigration - ProCon.org



b. "If you’ve visited the DMV in the last few weeks, you may have noticed that you can now complete your voter registration at the same time you renew your driver’s license — without having to fill out a separate form.... they will be registered as having no party preference. " Registered to vote at the DMV? Check again. Many who use the new process miss a vital step two



Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review
Typical of the hypocrisy of the right wing:

Albertson’s response letter to Cegavske read in part: “Your letter comes as a complete surprise as you and your office have reviewed, contributed to, and approved the processes you are expressing concerns about.”

And, since Your guy lost the Popular vote; y'all have to prove any illegals who allegedly voted, voted blue and not red.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,577
Reaction score
9,502
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
lol. Right wingers believe in less in equal rights.
Link or own your lie
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,577
Reaction score
9,502
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
God given rights not the rights that are given and taken away by democrats
Persons who believe in God should not be immoral enough to bear false witness or practice the abomination of hypocrisy.

Not bright enough to insist on equality and equal protection of the laws or is that concept too difficult for the right wing.
You're right they don't lie I don't lie and you're still wrong. Where is your
There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.
Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.
Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.
Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.
Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.
You're ignoring a lot of things
I am not the one ignoring express Constitutional law and whining about it.
post your sources
Our Constitution. Show us Any gender or race terms in our Original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Anything gender or race specific happened after that, because right wingers could not obey our own laws.
show me where slaves or blacks had citizenship before the ratification of the 14th amendment and the creation of the civil rights act of 1866?
lol. We know why right wingers did not vote Republican before our Civil War. Equality and equal protection of the laws has always been difficult for the right wing.
yourdumb ass no such thing as a right wing left wing when this country was created it was all democrat
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,577
Reaction score
9,502
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
 

AZrailwhale

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
598
Reaction score
596
Points
493
Location
Arizona
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
Conservatives are in favor of EVERYONE having the same rights, not gay people, women, latinos, blacks or anyone else having special, or specific rights. Perhaps it's simpler to say that conservatives are in favor of AMERICAN RIGHTS.
 

AZrailwhale

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
598
Reaction score
596
Points
493
Location
Arizona
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
God given rights not the rights that are given and taken away by democrats
Persons who believe in God should not be immoral enough to bear false witness or practice the abomination of hypocrisy.

Not bright enough to insist on equality and equal protection of the laws or is that concept too difficult for the right wing.
You're right they don't lie I don't lie and you're still wrong. Where is your
There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.
Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.
Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.
Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.
Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.
You're ignoring a lot of things
I am not the one ignoring express Constitutional law and whining about it.
post your sources
Our Constitution. Show us Any gender or race terms in our Original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Anything gender or race specific happened after that, because right wingers could not obey our own laws.
show me where slaves or blacks had citizenship before the ratification of the 14th amendment and the creation of the civil rights act of 1866?
lol. We know why right wingers did not vote Republican before our Civil War. Equality and equal protection of the laws has always been difficult for the right wing.
yourdumb ass no such thing as a right wing left wing when this country was created it was all democrat
Actually, you are wrong, The First Party System of the United States featured the Federalist Party and the Democratic- Republican Party (also known as the Anti-Federalist Party). The Federalists were the closest to the modern democratic party wanting a large, powerful central government. The Democratic-Republican party was closest to the conservative/republican party believing in a small central government with little power.
 

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
208
Points
140
" Anti-Racist Racist Bigotry Intolerance And Violence Of The Left Has Nothing To Do With Roe V Wade Constitutionality "

* Party Platform Policy Profundity *


Yep, Democrats always denigrate human life. Rioting, Abortion.....etc.
This individual is more closely aligned with republican policies that have nothing to do with being anti-choice .

The anti-choice camp does not exclusive to the republican party and the religious riech is 100% against the birth requisite for citizenship and therefore equal protection as provided by us constitution .
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
lol. Right wingers believe in less in equal rights.
Link or own your lie
I got banned from a thread by right wing socialists who care more about censorship than they do about the topics.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
Conservatives are in favor of EVERYONE having the same rights, not gay people, women, latinos, blacks or anyone else having special, or specific rights. Perhaps it's simpler to say that conservatives are in favor of AMERICAN RIGHTS.
Who are these alleged conservatives? Right wingers care about their bigotry and censorship than they care about "natural rights".
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,577
Reaction score
9,502
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
By what measure?

Are Republicans in favor of Gay rights? Women's rights? Black rights? Latino rights?

Are Republicans advocates for American Islamic rights?
God given rights not the rights that are given and taken away by democrats
Persons who believe in God should not be immoral enough to bear false witness or practice the abomination of hypocrisy.

Not bright enough to insist on equality and equal protection of the laws or is that concept too difficult for the right wing.
You're right they don't lie I don't lie and you're still wrong. Where is your
There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.
Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.
Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.
Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.
Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.
You're ignoring a lot of things
I am not the one ignoring express Constitutional law and whining about it.
post your sources
Our Constitution. Show us Any gender or race terms in our Original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Anything gender or race specific happened after that, because right wingers could not obey our own laws.
show me where slaves or blacks had citizenship before the ratification of the 14th amendment and the creation of the civil rights act of 1866?
lol. We know why right wingers did not vote Republican before our Civil War. Equality and equal protection of the laws has always been difficult for the right wing.
yourdumb ass no such thing as a right wing left wing when this country was created it was all democrat
Actually, you are wrong, The First Party System of the United States featured the Federalist Party and the Democratic- Republican Party (also known as the Anti-Federalist Party). The Federalists were the closest to the modern democratic party wanting a large, powerful central government. The Democratic-Republican party was closest to the conservative/republican party believing in a small central government with little power.
Actually I'm not because the democratic-republican party is the democrat party. and the Republican party wasn't created until years later from what was called the whig party
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List