3/5 Of A Human Being

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,574
Reaction score
9,501
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.
So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?
I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.
You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?
Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.
Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?
I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.
The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.
You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.
Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.
How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.
You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.
That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol
Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?
democrats still don't believe in equal rights
lol. Right wingers believe in less in equal rights.
Link or own your lie
I got banned from a thread by right wing socialists who care more about censorship than they do about the topics.
1. what does you getting banned from a thread have to do with your inability to provide a link to support your opinion?
2. How do you know who caused you to get banned? do you have proof?
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,574
Reaction score
9,501
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
 

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
208
Points
140
" Respite Of Technical Jargon For Removing Your Own Head From Your Own Rectum "

* Iterative Application Of Mundane Language *

lol. Right wingers believe in less in equal rights.
If only the inanity would go away for a presumption that the term " equal rights ( sic ) " has any genetic meaning in political science .

There are negative wrights written as prescriptions against authoritarian actions of government that represent protections of negative liberties to act without government interference .

There are positive wights that are prescriptions for authoritarian actions of government .

The positive wrights written as prescriptions for authoritarian actions of government that represent protections of negative liberties to act without interference from other individual citizens .

The positive wrights prescribing authoritarian actions of government may be for endowments of positive liberties to act with interference from other individual citizens , as the endowments are acquired from other individuals by means of contentious aggression .

While negative liberties represent protections to act independently from interference by government or by other individuals , positive liberties represents endowments acquiesced from other individuals through authoritarian actions by government .

While negative liberties may be equally protected , positive wrights may not be equally endowed .

So , cease and desist in absurd use of the " equal rights ( sic ) " reference .
 
Last edited:

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Respite Of Technical Jargon For Removing Your Own Head From Your Own Rectum "

* Iterative Application Of Mundane Language *

lol. Right wingers believe in less in equal rights.
If only the inanity would go away for a presumption that the term " equal rights ( sic ) " has any genetic meaning in political science .

There are negative wrights that proscriptions against authoritarian actions of government that represent protections of negative liberties to act without government interference .

There are positive wights that are prescriptions for authoritarian actions of government .

The positive wrights prescribing authoritarian actions of government my be for protections of negative liberties to act without interference from other individual citizens .

The positive wrights prescribing authoritarian actions of government my be for endowments of positive liberties to act with interference from other individual citizens .

While negative liberties represent protections to act independently from interference by government or by other individuals , positive liberties represents endowments acquiesced from other individuals through authoritarian actions by government .

While negative liberties may be equally protected , positive wrights may not be equally endowed .

So , cease and desist in absurd use of the " equal rights ( sic ) " reference .
Not my experience with right wingers, at all.
 

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
208
Points
140
" Illegitimate Aggression Versus Disappointment For Legitimate Aggression "

* Stipulations Of A ' Natural Rights ( sic ) ' Concept *

Who are these alleged conservatives? Right wingers care about their bigotry and censorship than they care about "natural rights".
The contemporary notion of " natural rights ( sic ) " stipulates divine retribution .

The religion of secular humanism may be adopting the " inalienable " conjecture from a " natural rights " paradigm to forward beliefs that wrights it espouses are consistent with the ideals of individual liberty , however the left adopts the assertions without a necessity for divine retribution that is absurd .

Neither the right not the left articulates a necessary distinction between negative liberties of protection and positive liberties of endowment .
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,574
Reaction score
9,501
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Illegitimate Aggression Versus Disappointment For Legitimate Aggression "

* Stipulations Of A ' Natural Rights ( sic ) ' Concept *

Who are these alleged conservatives? Right wingers care about their bigotry and censorship than they care about "natural rights".
The contemporary notion of " natural rights ( sic ) " stipulates divine retribution .

The religion of secular humanism may be adopting the " inalienable " conjecture from a " natural rights " paradigm to forward beliefs that wrights it espouses are consistent with the ideals of individual liberty , however the left adopts the assertions without a necessity for divine retribution that is absurd .

Neither the right not the left articulates a necessary distinction between negative liberties of protection and positive liberties of endowment .
Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,574
Reaction score
9,501
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,574
Reaction score
9,501
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
Damn you're ignorant
the organized militia which is the national guard is under the control of the government
The unorganized militia is not
 
Last edited:

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
208
Points
140
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence from the theories .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,574
Reaction score
9,501
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
Damn you're ignorant
the organized militia which is the national guard is under the control of the government
The unorganized militia is not
lol. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States, it says so in the first clause. Individuals of the People are subject to the Police Power of a State. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free State. The riots are Proof of why we need gun control laws for Individuals.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence from the theories .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
The preamble to our federal Constitution provides the context for our form of Government. It is not relativist but a mission statement for how our laws should be interpreted.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reaction score
1,978
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
" Choosing Alternative Perspectives "

* Unconstrained By Uncertainties *


Don't believe in our Declaration of Independence?
The statements in the declaration of independence represent perspectives of the time .

The concepts of relativism and existentialism provision that nothing is assured , but anything is possible , so individuals are not resigned to being deprived of liberty by anyone or anything , even though some believe to be entitled to deprive others of liberty as a consequence .

Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
You're trying to have a highly educated discussion with someone who thinks slaves had citizenship rights before the civil rights act of 1866
Natural born Persons in the US are citizens.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All persons born in the US after 1808 were citizens by birth just like any other Person.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,574
Reaction score
9,501
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.
it's the history of your democrat party lol
lol. Still appealing to ignorance not from ignorance? The South were democrats back then and is why they rebelled Against a Republican and his republican administration.
And your point after all they are rebelling now
The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
the unorganized exist to make sure we have a free state
lol. No, they don't. We have a First Amendment for that. Gun lovers only allege to care about the Second Amendment to love their guns better not because they actually Care about the security of our free States.
WOW SMH no we have the first amendment because of the second amendment
Not at all. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States; something the unorganized militia is worthless for.
wow how do you keep your first amendment right when it's the government with it's militia that has taken it away? You are fucking clueless
By not appealing to as much ignorance as right wingers. The Organized militia has literal recourse to our Second Amendment. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free States and prove it by all the gun control laws we have for Individuals of the People who comprise the unorganized militia. It is merely your right wing bigotry that causes you to be clueless and Causeless and hypocritical enough to project your fantastical line of reasoning on to others.
Damn you're ignorant
the organized militia which is the national guard is under the control of the government
The unorganized militia is not
lol. Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States, it says so in the first clause. Individuals of the People are subject to the Police Power of a State. The unorganized militia is worthless to the security of our free State. The riots are Proof of why we need gun control laws for Individuals.
the organized milita state guard dictates you no longer have a free state and are under their rule
The riots are proof of why we need gun control??????? how do you stop rioters from harming you when the police are told to stand down?
Tell you what you do go live in one of those leftists controlled blue cities
FYI gun control violates second amendment rights to a free state
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top