3/5 Of A Human Being

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The purpose of the census is to count "the whole number of persons". Not create non-people when there are actual people to be counted. You're argument says not all men are created equal. How does that square up with the founding fathers?

Or are you saying racism and bigotry must govern our nation?

"The purpose of the census is to count "the whole number of persons".


And, as usual, Democrats/Liberals have corrupted the intent.


They follow Lucifer's press agent, Saul Alinsky, a brilliant exponent of the worst elements of human nature, and intend it to increase their power- power to destroy America.


"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
Alinsky


Obama was far more open about the plan, telling illegal aliens to go and vote: "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."


Either you are out to destroy America, or you are as dumb as asphalt.
Which is it?

Right wingers are worse. They just make up right wing fantasy and keep repeating it.

oh the Irony is thick in this boy

Says the right wing who only know how to appeal to ignorance instead of providing valid rebuttals with valid arguments.

As I said the irony is thick in this boy.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.

Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.

Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.

Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.

Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.

 

[danielpalos]

What do democrats when talking about slave owning democrats always address them as right wing?
They were DEMOCRATS they were racist just like democrats are now still racist

Right wingers are getting their confederate statues removed. The democrats are for social justice in modern times.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.

What does it matter? This happens to be 2020! Women weren't allowed to vote in 1866! Do you want 1866 governance for a 2020 nation?

It matters when states are getting representation for people they should not be getting iLLEGALS SHOULD BE COUNTED AS 3/5

Obey our naturalization laws right wingers. Don't be illegals to the laws.

What in the fuck does that have to do with states receiving more represtives in the house because of illegal immigrants?

lol. If you actually understood the concept you would understand that we should have no illegals or illegal underclass because there is no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution. The three fifths clause could apply to foreign nationals with our naturalization clause.

once again what did you blather have to do with states receiving more representatives in the house because of illegal immigrants?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What do democrats when talking about slave owning democrats always address them as right wing?
They were DEMOCRATS they were racist just like democrats are now still racist

Right wingers are getting their confederate statues removed. The democrats are for social justice in modern times.

democrats today are the same as democrats of the 19th century

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.

Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.

How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.

You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.

Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.

Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.

Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.

Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.

You're ignoring a lot of things

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

"The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism.. "



Let's check:

Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.



Is this the party you support?

Typical of right wing misdirection and misleading. Right wingers vote republican, now. They changed from voting democrat after the civil rights acts. To much equality for right wingers to handle, I guess.

Liar prove it or retract your lie.

They vote republican now not democrat.

The right wing has never voted democrat

lol. You mean the South voted for Lincoln?

no democrats didn't even allow Lincoln on the ballot in the south

You mean the persons who rebelled against the Union to keep slavery?

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.

What does it matter? This happens to be 2020! Women weren't allowed to vote in 1866! Do you want 1866 governance for a 2020 nation?

It matters when states are getting representation for people they should not be getting iLLEGALS SHOULD BE COUNTED AS 3/5

Obey our naturalization laws right wingers. Don't be illegals to the laws.

What in the fuck does that have to do with states receiving more represtives in the house because of illegal immigrants?

lol. If you actually understood the concept you would understand that we should have no illegals or illegal underclass because there is no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution. The three fifths clause could apply to foreign nationals with our naturalization clause.

once again what did you blather have to do with states receiving more representatives in the house because of illegal immigrants?

lol. Having difficulty understanding the concepts? If you actually understood the concept you would understand that we should have no illegals or illegal underclass because there is no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution. The three fifths clause could apply to foreign nationals with our naturalization clause.

 

[danielpalos]

What do democrats when talking about slave owning democrats always address them as right wing?
They were DEMOCRATS they were racist just like democrats are now still racist

Right wingers are getting their confederate statues removed. The democrats are for social justice in modern times.

democrats today are the same as democrats of the 19th century

They can't be. Democrats back then rebelled against the Union and did not vote republican.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.

Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.

Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.

Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.

Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.

You're ignoring a lot of things

I am not the one ignoring express Constitutional law and whining about it.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.

Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.

How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.

You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.

That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What do democrats when talking about slave owning democrats always address them as right wing?
They were DEMOCRATS they were racist just like democrats are now still racist

Right wingers are getting their confederate statues removed. The democrats are for social justice in modern times.

democrats today are the same as democrats of the 19th century

They can't be. Democrats back then rebelled against the Union and did not vote republican.

oh fuck democrats are rebelling today and not voting Republican
I rest my case dumb shit.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.

Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.

Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.

Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.

Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.

You're ignoring a lot of things

I am not the one ignoring express Constitutional law and whining about it.

post your sources

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.

Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.

How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.

You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.

That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol

Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?

 

[danielpalos]

What do democrats when talking about slave owning democrats always address them as right wing?
They were DEMOCRATS they were racist just like democrats are now still racist

Right wingers are getting their confederate statues removed. The democrats are for social justice in modern times.

democrats today are the same as democrats of the 19th century

They can't be. Democrats back then rebelled against the Union and did not vote republican.

oh fuck democrats are rebelling today
I rest my case dumb shit.

You have no case, only ignorance.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.

Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.

Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.

Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.

Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.

You're ignoring a lot of things

I am not the one ignoring express Constitutional law and whining about it.

post your sources

Our Constitution. Show us Any gender or race terms in our Original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Anything gender or race specific happened after that, because right wingers could not obey our own laws.

 

[danielpalos]

Here is actual history not just right wing fantasy. Proof right wingers are true witness bearing challenged and are willing to project onto others what they themselves are doing.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.

Anyone born in the US after 1808 was a citizen by birth since general Government of the Union assumed that sovereign obligation from the several States.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With acception of Native Americans.

How did you reach your conclusion? Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception. Being unable to bear true witness to our own laws seems to be a right wing trait.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Why don't you address this instead of giving your opinion?
Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.
The census of 1790 said only white males had citizenship
The civil rights act of 1866 made sure all Americans had citizenship
With exception of Native Americans.

You have even less. It is not my opinion. Our original Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral. It is supposed to effectuate our declaration of Independence.

That's why the civil rights act of 1866 was created that's why the 13th and 14th amendments were crated
That's why separate legislation was created to give Native Americans citizenship.
And women right to vote
yes sir our "original constitution and bill of rights was so much gender and race neutral those things had to be written in. lol

Southern democrats had a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws. They did not vote republican back then. Why appeal to so much ignorance and inist you are right, right winger?

democrats still don't believe in equal rights

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should have no illegal problem or illegal underclass.

Uh, illegal means the law already doesn't apply. You might as well say the Constitution has no drug policy clause so we shouldn't have any problem with ne'er do wells illegally smoking pot in Mom's basement. The truth is, we do have a problem.

Only if you appeal to ignorance of the laws and don't care about natural rights.

Which is what I was talking about in your post. We have an illegal problem and an illegal underclass because the law and the Constitution is being ignored.

Show us the Immigration clause that is being ignored, right wingers. Don't just be hypocrites and whine about it.

You're ignoring a lot of things

I am not the one ignoring express Constitutional law and whining about it.

post your sources

Our Constitution. Show us Any gender or race terms in our Original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Anything gender or race specific happened after that, because right wingers could not obey our own laws.

show me where slaves or blacks had citizenship before the ratification of the 14th amendment and the creation of the civil rights act of 1866?