- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,216
- 2,565
- 315
- Thread starter
- #381
"Greenie Hysteria" from NASA, Yale, Columbia, NOAA, NAS/Natl Academy of Sciences, etc, etc?
What have you put up?
`
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Greenie Hysteria" from NASA, Yale, Columbia, NOAA, NAS/Natl Academy of Sciences, etc, etc?
I found that NOAA has been taking the hottest days of the year, but not adding in the coldest days of the year, then getting an average which is screwed up. I have as much faith in any government org, as i do the shitter in chief Joe Biteme.it's been my questions for forever. Constantly cold here in Chitown. And all around us in the region. Flip the globe the same thing. Not sure where it's warming except in some warmers back yard.
And where did you "found" (FABRICATE) that you raging idiot?I found that NOAA has been taking the hottest days of the year, but Not adding in the coldest days of the year, then getting an average which is screwed up. I have as much faith in any government org, as i do the shitter in chief Joe Biteme.
Oh yeah, prove me wrong..And where did you "found" (FABRICATE) that you raging idiot?
What an @sinine claim/Lie.
`
Numerous scientists and experts confirmed Goddard’s explosive findings, but in separate responses to The New American, both NOAA and NASA attempted to downplay the significance of the accusations. The major problems identified by Goddard in the temperature records of federal bureaucracies relate to the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN), the official data-set covering the continental United States. While the agencies admit the records are adjusted, Goddard and multiple scientists suggested that biased methodology was used to adjust the data to show an unjustified and “spurious” warming trend.
Oh yeah, prove me wrong..
U.S. Agencies Accused of Fudging Data to Show Global Warming - The New American
You are such a Global Warming, Religious Zealot, moronic idiot.
View attachment 627940
So far all you have presented is lib/greenie hysteria
what do you plan to do about it?
No one is convinced by the data presented by man-made global warming zealots
Most people are convinced, and 98% of Climate scientists are Convinced.No one is convinced by the data presented by man-made global warming zealots
the climate has never been static
Most people are convinced, and 98% of Climate scientists are Convinced.
`
What a bold face lie.Most people are convinced, and 98% of Climate scientists are Convinced.
`
NASA was caught falsifying climate data several times when The Worthless Negro was President and now they are back doing it again with President Potatohead.
They have no credibility.
Are they?Most people are convinced, and 98% of Climate scientists are Convinced.
`
SnopesWas Global Warming Data ‘Faked’ to ‘Fit Climate Change Fictions’?
That adjustments are made to records of climate is neither a scoop, nor a secret, nor a controversy.
- Published 3 October 2019 - Snopes
Claim
NASA and NOAA faked climate data in the GISTEMP global temperature record to exaggerate global warming.
Rating
False
Origin
Since 2014, climate-change deniers have squeezed millions of views, Facebook shares, and Twitter retweets by retelling a story alleging the discovery of “faked” NASA data designed to “fit a climate change narrative.” Though copied almost wholesale from a blog post, the version of the story that has had the most online traction was published on the one-stop Conspiracy theory/supplement shop that goes by the name Natural News....
[..............]
[..............]
[..............]
Was Global Warming Data 'Faked' to 'Fit Climate Change Fictions'?
That adjustments are made to records of climate is neither a scoop, nor a secret, nor a controversy.www.snopes.com
`
every fucking argument you bring up with Snopes is a failure...Only Joe Biden voters believe that snopes is a fact checker.....vs Dopes.
`
You post Pronouncements, No facts, No backing.every fucking argument you bring up with Snopes is a failure...Only Joe Biden voters believe that snopes is a fact checker.....
Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers: Snopes Exposes Its Left-Wing Bias with Sham Pro-AOC 'Fact Check'
In a Wednesday fact-check, Snopes took aim at several stories while misstating - perhaps deliberately - what it aimed to prove.www.westernjournal.com
You post Links.You post Pronouncements, No facts, No backing.
You're just an empty Partisan TROLL.
100% Empty.
vs Dopes.
`
That's not true.You post Links.
You're just an empty Partisan TROLL.
100% Empty.
You are a liar.That's not true.
I post plenty of long meaty posts in my own words Orthoducks boy.
`