2020 Ties for Hottest Year on Record, NASA Says (Nullfying 10,000 "it's cold this morning" posts here)

[abu afak]

Mac-7 said:
So far all you have presented is lib/greenie hysteria

what do you plan to do about it?

"Greenie Hysteria" from NASA, Yale, Columbia, NOAA, NAS/Natl Academy of Sciences, etc, etc?
What have you put up?

`

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

it's been my questions for forever. Constantly cold here in Chitown. And all around us in the region. Flip the globe the same thing. Not sure where it's warming except in some warmers back yard.

I found that NOAA has been taking the hottest days of the year, but not adding in the coldest days of the year, then getting an average which is screwed up. I have as much faith in any government org, as i do the shitter in chief Joe Biteme.

 

[abu afak]

I found that NOAA has been taking the hottest days of the year, but Not adding in the coldest days of the year, then getting an average which is screwed up. I have as much faith in any government org, as i do the shitter in chief Joe Biteme.

And where did you "found" (FABRICATE) that you raging idiot?
What an @sinine claim/Lie.

`

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

And where did you "found" (FABRICATE) that you raging idiot?
What an @sinine claim/Lie.

`

Oh yeah, prove me wrong..

U.S. Agencies Accused of Fudging Data to Show Global Warming - The New American

Numerous scientists and experts confirmed Goddard’s explosive findings, but in separate responses to The New American, both NOAA and NASA attempted to downplay the significance of the accusations. The major problems identified by Goddard in the temperature records of federal bureaucracies relate to the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN), the official data-set covering the continental United States. While the agencies admit the records are adjusted, Goddard and multiple scientists suggested that biased methodology was used to adjust the data to show an unjustified and “spurious” warming trend.

You are such a Global Warming, Religious Zealot, moronic idiot.

 

[abu afak]

Oh yeah, prove me wrong..

U.S. Agencies Accused of Fudging Data to Show Global Warming - The New American

You are such a Global Warming, Religious Zealot, moronic idiot.

View attachment 627940

The 2014 Article on a RW Conspiracy website, citing another Right Wing Conspiracy website on his 'work' many years before that.... as he DIED in 2012.

Real Science Announces the Death of Steve Goddard

The web site Real Science has posted an announcement of the death of blogger and former WUWT contributor Steve Goddard. WUWT has not yet been able to verify any of the details but Anthony has asked…

wattsupwiththat.com

Further... Another RW Conspiarcy blog

Real Science’s ‘Steven Goddard’ Outs Himself — Reveals True Identity: ‘My name is Tony Heller. I am a whistle blower’

Visit the post for more.

www.climatedepot.com

and Finally Who IS your article citing?

Real Climate Science​

Last updated on January 14th, 2022 at 07:28 am

---

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE​

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

• Overall, we rate Real Climate Science a Quackery level pseudoscience website as well as a moderate conspiracy website based on promoting that the solutions for climate change lead to communism. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and a complete rejection of the consensus of science regarding human-influenced climate change.

---

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History​

Founded in 2015, Real Climate Science is a skeptical climate science blog created by Tony Heller (formerly known as Steven Goddard). According to their about page, Tony Heller is an electrical engineer who worked as a science teacher and geologist. The page further states, “climate science doesn’t work because it is done largely by dishonest, incompetent hacks who don’t follow or even understand any legitimate methodology.”

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership​

Real Climate Science is owned by Tony Heller and is funded through advertising and donations.

Analysis / Bias​

In review, Real Climate Science is the personal blog of Tony Heller, whose mission is to debunk the consensus that climate change is strongly human-influenced. Articles and headlines often feature highly emotional wording such as this Alarmists Using Children For Climate Fodder. This is a video story narrated by Tony Heller that claims the solutions for climate change are the same as communism. Politically, Real Climate Science aligns with the right through the support of former President Trump’s environmental deregulation and human-influenced climate change denial Obama’s Plan Vs. Trump’s Plan. In general, Tony Heller and his Real Climate Science blog believe that climate change is The Biggest Fraud In History. This theory is at odds with the consensus of science. According to a recent report by Cornell University, “More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.”
Most of the information published on this blog is not derived from peer-reviewed research; in fact, Mr. Heller explains why peer-reviewed studies in climate change are “worthless” Why Climate Science Peer Review Is Worthless. In general, Real Climate Science is opposed to Real Climate Science.

Failed Fact Checks​

• “[T]he raw data, the actual thermometer data[…] shows that the US has been cooling for 80 to 90 years. But the graphs they release to the public show warming trend, and it’s all because they’ve altered the data.” – Inaccurate
• “NASA scientists fudged the numbers to make 1998 the hottest year to overstate the extent of global warming.” – Pants on Fire
• “[NASA] has been adjusting temperatures from the past[…] downward, while adjusting current-day temperatures upward, and those changes are responsible for most of the claimed global warming during that time.” – Inaccurate

Overall, we rate Real Climate Science a Quackery level pseudoscience website as well as a moderate conspiracy website based on promoting that the solutions for climate change lead to communism. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and a complete rejection of the consensus of science regarding human-influenced climate change. (D. Van Zandt 1/25/2020) Updated (01/14/2022)

Source: Real Climate Science | "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts." — Richard Feynman

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Real Climate Science

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

cc.bingj.com

YOU EFFFING MORON YOU RE A LOWLIFE RW SCVMBAG CONSPIRACYST.


`

 

[abu afak]

So far all you have presented is lib/greenie hysteria

what do you plan to do about it?

2

`

 

[Mac-7]

2

`

No one is convinced by the data presented by man-made global warming zealots

the climate has never been static

 

[abu afak]

No one is convinced by the data presented by man-made global warming zealots

the climate has never been static

Most people are convinced, and 98% of Climate scientists are Convinced.

`

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Most people are convinced, and 98% of Climate scientists are Convinced.

`

Just not convinced enough to spend their own money.

 

[Flash]

NASA was caught falsifying climate data several times when The Worthless Negro was President and now they are back doing it again with President Potatohead.

They have no credibility.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Most people are convinced, and 98% of Climate scientists are Convinced.

`

What a bold face lie.

 

[abu afak]

NASA was caught falsifying climate data several times when The Worthless Negro was President and now they are back doing it again with President Potatohead.

They have no credibility.

Was Global Warming Data ‘Faked’ to ‘Fit Climate Change Fictions’?​

That adjustments are made to records of climate is neither a scoop, nor a secret, nor a controversy.​

• Published 3 October 2019 - Snopes

Claim​

NASA and NOAA faked climate data in the GISTEMP global temperature record to exaggerate global warming.

Rating​

False

Origin​

Since 2014, climate-change deniers have squeezed millions of views, Facebook shares, and Twitter retweets by retelling a story alleging the discovery of “faked” NASA data designed to “fit a climate change narrative.” Though copied almost wholesale from a blog post, the version of the story that has had the most online traction was published on the one-stop Conspiracy theory/supplement shop that goes by the name Natural News....
[..............]

[..............]

[..............]

Was Global Warming Data 'Faked' to 'Fit Climate Change Fictions'?

That adjustments are made to records of climate is neither a scoop, nor a secret, nor a controversy.

www.snopes.com

`

 

[ding]

Most people are convinced, and 98% of Climate scientists are Convinced.

`

Are they?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Was Global Warming Data ‘Faked’ to ‘Fit Climate Change Fictions’?​

That adjustments are made to records of climate is neither a scoop, nor a secret, nor a controversy.​

• Published 3 October 2019 - Snopes

Claim​

NASA and NOAA faked climate data in the GISTEMP global temperature record to exaggerate global warming.

Rating​

False

Origin​

Since 2014, climate-change deniers have squeezed millions of views, Facebook shares, and Twitter retweets by retelling a story alleging the discovery of “faked” NASA data designed to “fit a climate change narrative.” Though copied almost wholesale from a blog post, the version of the story that has had the most online traction was published on the one-stop Conspiracy theory/supplement shop that goes by the name Natural News....
[..............]

[..............]

[..............]

Was Global Warming Data 'Faked' to 'Fit Climate Change Fictions'?

That adjustments are made to records of climate is neither a scoop, nor a secret, nor a controversy.

www.snopes.com

`

Snopes

 

[abu afak]

Snopes

vs Dopes.

`

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

vs Dopes.

`

every fucking argument you bring up with Snopes is a failure...Only Joe Biden voters believe that snopes is a fact checker.....

Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers: Snopes Exposes Its Left-Wing Bias with Sham Pro-AOC 'Fact Check'

In a Wednesday fact-check, Snopes took aim at several stories while misstating - perhaps deliberately - what it aimed to prove.

www.westernjournal.com

 

[abu afak]

every fucking argument you bring up with Snopes is a failure...Only Joe Biden voters believe that snopes is a fact checker.....

Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers: Snopes Exposes Its Left-Wing Bias with Sham Pro-AOC 'Fact Check'

In a Wednesday fact-check, Snopes took aim at several stories while misstating - perhaps deliberately - what it aimed to prove.

www.westernjournal.com

You post Pronouncements, No facts, No backing.
You're just an empty Partisan TROLL.
100% Empty.
Put up some ON TOPIC meaty responses.
"NO" is not an answer you Empty POS.
`

 

[Indeependent]

You post Pronouncements, No facts, No backing.
You're just an empty Partisan TROLL.
100% Empty.

You post Links.
You're just an empty Partisan TROLL.
100% Empty.

 

[abu afak]

vs Dopes.

`

You post Links.
You're just an empty Partisan TROLL.
100% Empty.

That's not true.
I post plenty of long meaty posts in my own words Orthoducks boy.
Why don't you brag that you know some smart Jew again (because you ain't)... you're only 'debate.'
`

 

[Indeependent]

That's not true.
I post plenty of long meaty posts in my own words Orthoducks boy.
`

You are a liar.
Your "narratives" are the content of the Links.