09/11 Commission RETRACTS Previous Report : Based On Government Lies

[Contumacious]

The 9/11 Commission Rejects Own Report as Based on Government Lies


The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.


.

 

[blu]

only complete retards believed anything that report had to say

 

[Liability]

The 9/11 Commission Rejects Own Report as Based on Government Lies


The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.


.

One "counsel" to the fucking commission is NOT "the Commission," first of all.

One counsel to the Commission is telling a story. That "story" was DIRECTED at the intended audience. It will "sell" to its target audience.

The Lew Rockwell "report" is misleading even before you get to the piece itself. The "headline" is flatly false.

Zzz.

I can't imagine that anyone was expecting anything else from "reportage" from the likes of Lew Rockwell.

 

[eots]

The 9/11 Commission Rejects Own Report as Based on Government Lies


The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.


.

One "counsel" to the fucking commission is NOT "the Commission," first of all.

One counsel to the Commission is telling a story. That "story" was DIRECTED at the intended audience. It will "sell" to its target audience.

The Lew Rockwell "report" is misleading even before you get to the piece itself. The "headline" is flatly false.

Zzz.

I can't imagine that anyone was expecting anything else from "reportage" from the likes of Lew Rockwell.

lairabilty talks out his ass..he has not a clue what the rest of the commisons opinions are on the 9/11 commison report..and he has never even read the 9/11 commison report...he isnt even well versed on the Busk/chenney story he supports

 

[rightwinger]

So....let me get your logic straight here truthers....

Because NORAD which tracks aircraft, gave misleading testimony to cover their ass..

Therefore.....9-11 was a CONTROLLED DEMO!


Makes perfect sense doesn't it?

 

[blu]

So....let me get your logic straight here truthers....

Because NORAD which tracks aircraft, gave misleading testimony to cover their ass..

Therefore.....9-11 was a CONTROLLED DEMO!


Makes perfect sense doesn't it?

if you had reading comprehension skills you would see the story specifically said "no" to the question of GW being involved, etc. there is nothing "truther" about this, you are just a brainwashed, "patriotic" fool

 

[eots]

So....let me get your logic straight here truthers....

Because NORAD which tracks aircraft, gave misleading testimony to cover their ass..

Therefore.....9-11 was a CONTROLLED DEMO!


Makes perfect sense doesn't it?

why do you disingenuously pretend that this is not just one of many ..many flaws ..lies and inconsistency in the Bush/cheney story of 9/11 ?

 

[Mad Scientist]

The 9/11 Commission Rejects Own Report as Based on Government Lies

The guy is just whoring a book. From your link;

Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No.

Damn! Lucy pulls the football out again!

What does Farmer's book tell us? Farmer offers no solutions, only a total and full rejection of what was told and his own his own ideas concerning the total failure of honesty on the part of the government, a government with something to hide. Farmer never tells us what.

Why would I wanna' buy a book that is just misleading and doesn't deliver? Troofers will eat this up sure enough though.

 

[Contumacious]

only complete retards believed anything that report had to say

Yes, indeed.

The author, John Farmer, is Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey. He was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.


.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

only complete retards believed anything that report had to say

you can say THAT again.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The 9/11 Commission Rejects Own Report as Based on Government Lies


The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.


.

One "counsel" to the fucking commission is NOT "the Commission," first of all.

One counsel to the Commission is telling a story. That "story" was DIRECTED at the intended audience. It will "sell" to its target audience.

The Lew Rockwell "report" is misleading even before you get to the piece itself. The "headline" is flatly false.

Zzz.

I can't imagine that anyone was expecting anything else from "reportage" from the likes of Lew Rockwell.

lairabilty talks out his ass..he has not a clue what the rest of the commisons opinions are on the 9/11 commison report..and he has never even read the 9/11 commison report...he isnt even well versed on the Busk/chenney story he supports

Princess Lia always talks out the side of his ass on any government conspiracy.

 

[Contumacious]

The 9/11 Commission Rejects Own Report as Based on Government Lies


The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.


.

One "counsel" to the fucking commission is NOT "the Commission," first of all.

Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

One counsel to the Commission is telling a story. That "story" was DIRECTED at the intended audience. It will "sell" to its target audience.

The Lew Rockwell "report" is misleading even before you get to the piece itself. The "headline" is flatly false.

Had you bothered reading the report you would have noticed that the original report was initiated by Salem News.

I can't imagine that anyone was expecting anything else from "reportage" from the likes of Lew Rockwell.

Because.....


.

 

[eots]

what does Farmer's book tell us? Farmer offers no solutions, only a total and full rejection of what was told and his own his own ideas concerning the total failure of honesty on the part of the government, a government with something to hide. Farmer never tells us what.

Why would I wanna' buy a book that is just misleading and doesn't deliver? Troofers will eat this up sure enough though[/QUOTE]


what a twisted logic of course all the commission members that call it a cover up..hogwash and even as far as treasonous...don't say ...bush ordered it..there has been no real investigation no testimony under oath no subpoena power..they to be fully responsible can only speak to what they know with certainty ..the report is a fraud and a cover-up

 

[Liability]

The 9/11 Commission Rejects Own Report as Based on Government Lies


The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.


.

One "counsel" to the fucking commission is NOT "the Commission," first of all.

One counsel to the Commission is telling a story. That "story" was DIRECTED at the intended audience. It will "sell" to its target audience.

The Lew Rockwell "report" is misleading even before you get to the piece itself. The "headline" is flatly false.

Zzz.

I can't imagine that anyone was expecting anything else from "reportage" from the likes of Lew Rockwell.

lairabilty talks out his ass..he has not a clue what the rest of the commisons opinions are on the 9/11 commison report..and he has never even read the 9/11 commison report...he isnt even well versed on the Busk/chenney story he supports

id-eots just made-up (with no concern for evidence or truth) every bit of the stupid post I just quoted above.

The fact remains. The OP cites the Lew Rockwell crap as evidence that the 9/11 Commissioners have retracted their report. That is flatly untrue and the piece quoted in (and cited by) the OP simply does not support the OP or even the headline of the linked piece.

Note: dishonest "Trufers" like our pal id-eots don't bother to address the actual point.

 

[Shorebreak]

The 9/11 Commission was not a whitewash and all of the details in the original 9/11 Commission Report are factual, regardless of what the authors and Commission members have to say about it.

If you question the integrity of the US Government on anything 9/11 related, you are a conspiracy theorist and are therefore a non-thinker.

The US government has never used soldiers or citizens as unwary test subjects and would never do so.

The US government has never allowed or enabled circumstances in order to motivate citizens to support an agenda.

Finance corporations do not have influence over Presidential politics or US policy.

There is no foreign entity or nation with significant influence over US policy.

The US media is comprised primarily of patriotic and ethical leadership and agenda's.

There is no ongoing effort to move US economies offshore or to prepare other global regions for economic integration.

Leading politicians hold our best interests in the highest regard and serve the people first and foremost.

If you believe that any of the above statements is true, you MUST agree that they were ALL untrue when 9/11 occured, and that they are always suspended in relation to 9/11 facts. Otherwise, you are a complete idiot, with no capacity for rational though, introspection, patriotism, compassion, analysis, relational logic, or normal human interaction. The official 9/11 story cannot be questioned, otherwise, we live in a controlled propagandized nation and our perceptions are probably all wrong.

Since we know that is not the case, we can state with logical accuracy that above statements that are typically true are suspended in the case of 9/11.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The 9/11 Commission was not a whitewash and all of the details in the original 9/11 Commission Report are factual, regardless of what the authors and Commission members have to say about it.

If you question the integrity of the US Government on anything 9/11 related, you are a conspiracy theorist and are therefore a non-thinker.

The US government has never used soldiers or citizens as unwary test subjects and would never do so.

The US government has never allowed or enabled circumstances in order to motivate citizens to support an agenda.

Finance corporations do not have influence over Presidential politics or US policy.

There is no foreign entity or nation with significant influence over US policy.

The US media is comprised primarily of patriotic and ethical leadership and agenda's.

There is no ongoing effort to move US economies offshore or to prepare other global regions for economic integration.

Leading politicians hold our best interests in the highest regard and serve the people first and foremost.

If you believe that any of the above statements is true, you MUST agree that they were ALL untrue when 9/11 occured, and that they are always suspended in relation to 9/11 facts. Otherwise, you are a complete idiot, with no capacity for rational though, introspection, patriotism, compassion, analysis, relational logic, or normal human interaction. The official 9/11 story cannot be questioned, otherwise, we live in a controlled propagandized nation and our perceptions are probably all wrong.

Since we know that is not the case, we can state with logical accuracy that above statements that are typically true are suspended in the case of 9/11.

okay whatever you say Candycorn.

 

[blu]

The 9/11 Commission was not a whitewash and all of the details in the original 9/11 Commission Report are factual, regardless of what the authors and Commission members have to say about it.

If you question the integrity of the US Government on anything 9/11 related, you are a conspiracy theorist and are therefore a non-thinker.

The US government has never used soldiers or citizens as unwary test subjects and would never do so.

The US government has never allowed or enabled circumstances in order to motivate citizens to support an agenda.

Finance corporations do not have influence over Presidential politics or US policy.

There is no foreign entity or nation with significant influence over US policy.

The US media is comprised primarily of patriotic and ethical leadership and agenda's.

There is no ongoing effort to move US economies offshore or to prepare other global regions for economic integration.

Leading politicians hold our best interests in the highest regard and serve the people first and foremost.

If you believe that any of the above statements is true, you MUST agree that they were ALL untrue when 9/11 occured, and that they are always suspended in relation to 9/11 facts. Otherwise, you are a complete idiot, with no capacity for rational though, introspection, patriotism, compassion, analysis, relational logic, or normal human interaction. The official 9/11 story cannot be questioned, otherwise, we live in a controlled propagandized nation and our perceptions are probably all wrong.

Since we know that is not the case, we can state with logical accuracy that above statements that are typically true are suspended in the case of 9/11.

okay whatever you say Candycorn.

I am pretty sure that post was sarcasm

 

[DiveCon]

The 9/11 Commission was not a whitewash and all of the details in the original 9/11 Commission Report are factual, regardless of what the authors and Commission members have to say about it.

If you question the integrity of the US Government on anything 9/11 related, you are a conspiracy theorist and are therefore a non-thinker.

The US government has never used soldiers or citizens as unwary test subjects and would never do so.

The US government has never allowed or enabled circumstances in order to motivate citizens to support an agenda.

Finance corporations do not have influence over Presidential politics or US policy.

There is no foreign entity or nation with significant influence over US policy.

The US media is comprised primarily of patriotic and ethical leadership and agenda's.

There is no ongoing effort to move US economies offshore or to prepare other global regions for economic integration.

Leading politicians hold our best interests in the highest regard and serve the people first and foremost.

If you believe that any of the above statements is true, you MUST agree that they were ALL untrue when 9/11 occured, and that they are always suspended in relation to 9/11 facts. Otherwise, you are a complete idiot, with no capacity for rational though, introspection, patriotism, compassion, analysis, relational logic, or normal human interaction. The official 9/11 story cannot be questioned, otherwise, we live in a controlled propagandized nation and our perceptions are probably all wrong.

Since we know that is not the case, we can state with logical accuracy that above statements that are typically true are suspended in the case of 9/11.

okay whatever you say Candycorn.

I am pretty sure that post was sarcasm

i'm pretty sure 9/11 rimjob never read beyond the first line, if even that far

 

[Toro]

okay whatever you say Candycorn.

I am pretty sure that post was sarcasm

i'm pretty sure 9/11 rimjob never read beyond the first line, if even that far

I'm pretty sure he doesn't understand context and nuance. Remember this?

[youtube]Q_OIXfkXEj0[/youtube]

As for the OP, in other words, some in the government are not telling us everything to save their own skin because doing so would have exposed their own incompetence regarding the worst foreign attack on civilians on the country's soil ever. Wow, would've thunk?

 

[candycorn]

only complete retards believed anything that report had to say

Really, what major fact did it get wrong?