Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,358
- 1,830
So.. is living in a realm 180 degrees out of phase with reality a prerequisite for being a lib?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
the only hunting is the witch hunt you libs did
This is one of the things that completely perplexes me about the Conservatives. Time and time again they get angry about government lies, spending, and waste. There was no bigger example of all of that with the invasion of Iraq. Nothing in my lifetime at least, and I will be seeing my 50th year in February. For completely false reasons and using a brand new doctrine, never used in the history of the United States, we went to war with Iraq. Everyone....and I mean everyone who had any sort of position to try and stop it was villified and demonized by conservatives. They went deaf dumb and blind on the whole thing. Wilson was no opportunist. He did a study..went and reported it..and was ignored. He saw the steam roller rolling by and tried to warn the country. For his effort his life and his wife's life was basically ruined. And then..after everything was said and done..some conservatives from the Bush administration starting coming out and saying, "Yeah..we knew it was wrong and it turned into a clusterfuck..but what the heck". And then they proceded to write books and make money.
And are conservatives outraged? Nope. It's more of an annoyance. So when people start to doubt the veracity of the conservative motives..look toward Iraq. Because from what we know now, the US was responsible for countless Iraqi deaths, the destruction of Iraq, over 30,000 US casualties including close to 5,000 deaths, trillions spent and a crushing blow to American prestige world wide. Add in this WILL inspire terrorists in a very real and major way.
Well, in my lifetime, I saw Tailgunner Joe. While he did not actively commit Treason, as those involved in the outing of Valerie Plame, and all the other agents that used the company cover that she did, he destroyed many lives with his lying demogogery.
Yes..that's right. Saddam was "this" close to building the bomb. All those WMDs the found in Iraq..makes us all glad Bush and the boys took him out.
[/sarcasm]
That dog won't hunt any more.
We all know who lied. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the rest of the PNAC bloody cowboys.
W wasn't a member of PNAC.
But all the people that pulled his strings were.
the only hunting is the witch hunt you libs didYes..that's right. Saddam was "this" close to building the bomb. All those WMDs the found in Iraq..makes us all glad Bush and the boys took him out.
[/sarcasm]
That dog won't hunt any more.
We all know who lied. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the rest of the PNAC bloody cowboys.
This is one of the things that completely perplexes me about the Conservatives. Time and time again they get angry about government lies, spending, and waste. There was no bigger example of all of that with the invasion of Iraq. Nothing in my lifetime at least, and I will be seeing my 50th year in February. For completely false reasons and using a brand new doctrine, never used in the history of the United States, we went to war with Iraq. Everyone....and I mean everyone who had any sort of position to try and stop it was villified and demonized by conservatives. They went deaf dumb and blind on the whole thing. Wilson was no opportunist. He did a study..went and reported it..and was ignored. He saw the steam roller rolling by and tried to warn the country. For his effort his life and his wife's life was basically ruined. And then..after everything was said and done..some conservatives from the Bush administration starting coming out and saying, "Yeah..we knew it was wrong and it turned into a clusterfuck..but what the heck". And then they proceded to write books and make money.
And are conservatives outraged? Nope. It's more of an annoyance. So when people start to doubt the veracity of the conservative motives..look toward Iraq. Because from what we know now, the US was responsible for countless Iraqi deaths, the destruction of Iraq, over 30,000 US casualties including close to 5,000 deaths, trillions spent and a crushing blow to American prestige world wide. Add in this WILL inspire terrorists in a very real and major way.
I just love that phrase "anti-war mythology"...it should be tatooed on your forehead.
the only hunting is the witch hunt you libs did
This is one of the things that completely perplexes me about the Conservatives. Time and time again they get angry about government lies, spending, and waste. There was no bigger example of all of that with the invasion of Iraq. Nothing in my lifetime at least, and I will be seeing my 50th year in February. For completely false reasons and using a brand new doctrine, never used in the history of the United States, we went to war with Iraq. Everyone....and I mean everyone who had any sort of position to try and stop it was villified and demonized by conservatives. They went deaf dumb and blind on the whole thing. Wilson was no opportunist. He did a study..went and reported it..and was ignored. He saw the steam roller rolling by and tried to warn the country. For his effort his life and his wife's life was basically ruined. And then..after everything was said and done..some conservatives from the Bush administration starting coming out and saying, "Yeah..we knew it was wrong and it turned into a clusterfuck..but what the heck". And then they proceded to write books and make money.
And are conservatives outraged? Nope. It's more of an annoyance. So when people start to doubt the veracity of the conservative motives..look toward Iraq. Because from what we know now, the US was responsible for countless Iraqi deaths, the destruction of Iraq, over 30,000 US casualties including close to 5,000 deaths, trillions spent and a crushing blow to American prestige world wide. Add in this WILL inspire terrorists in a very real and major way.
you are a partisan hack with a broad brush.
Joe Wilson is the liarDid they name Richard Armitage as a traitor, too?
Nope.
Yes..that's right. Saddam was "this" close to building the bomb. All those WMDs the found in Iraq..makes us all glad Bush and the boys took him out.
[/sarcasm]
That dog won't hunt any more.
We all know who lied. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the rest of the PNAC bloody cowboys.
It is not traitorous to out a mere fucking analyst.
Valerie .ooooo7 Plame Mrs. Ambassador Joe nutbar Wilson was just a fucking analyst.
Read and learn you ignorant douche..
Valerie Plame - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Say thank you....
The ignorant douche (as always) is you, ya mindless fuckwit.
The mere fact that you cite AS "authority" an article in fucking Wikipedia is proof enough that you are merely a hack.
Valerie was a fucking analyst. Period. End of fucking story.
And the dude that "outed" her as an analyst for the CIA (not that it wasn't known, anyway) was Armitage.
There was -- despite the shrill and always dishonest shrieks from dishonest lefties like you -- no criminal behavior by Mr. Rove or Mr. Cheney or by Mr. Libby. What a crock of shit that prosecution was.
I just love that phrase "anti-war mythology"...it should be tatooed on your forehead.
What "anti-war mythology".
Every reason..each and every one of them..for invading Iraq turned out to be a big fat stinking lie.
I just love that phrase "anti-war mythology"...it should be tatooed on your forehead.
What "anti-war mythology".
Every reason..each and every one of them..for invading Iraq turned out to be a big fat stinking lie.
Regarding Plame being covert or not covert, it's a fact that CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden, in testimonny and in written form, confirmed that Plame was covert at the time out the outing, as do CIA documents.
Why are people claiming that Plame wasn't covert? Anyone?
Good grief... Valerie Plame again?
Gee, let's discuss Charlemagne and the Charles the Hammer while we're drifting down ancient history lane.
Regarding Plame being covert or not covert, it's a fact that CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden, in testimonny and in written form, confirmed that Plame was covert at the time out the outing, as do CIA documents.
Why are people claiming that Plame wasn't covert? Anyone?
Because she wasn't. That's why. The CIA outted her in the mid 90's to the Russians.
Next.
Regarding Plame being covert or not covert, it's a fact that CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden, in testimonny and in written form, confirmed that Plame was covert at the time out the outing, as do CIA documents.
Why are people claiming that Plame wasn't covert? Anyone?
Because she wasn't. That's why. The CIA outted her in the mid 90's to the Russians.
Next.
=========================
CIA Director Hayden: Wilson Was Covert
During House hearings today, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) announced that CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden recently told Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Silvestre Reyes (D-TX) that there was no doubt Victoria Plame Wilson was covert. Cummings relaying what Waxman had told him said that Gen. Hayden expressed clearly and directly, Ms. Wilson was covert.
Cummings also asked Wilson to respond to the specific claim, made by Victoria Toensing and others, that Plame had lost her covert status because she had not been stationed abroad within five years. Cummings asked, During the past five years, Ms. Plame, from today, did you conduct secret missions overseas? She answered, Yes I did, congressman.
=======================
So, Hayden, Plame and the CIA all comitted purjury?
Wow, that's amazing!!!!!
Much as I hold that roster in the utmost disdain and contempt, it was Richard Armitage who "outed" the non-covert "covert agent".Joe Wilson is the liar
Yes..that's right. Saddam was "this" close to building the bomb. All those WMDs the found in Iraq..makes us all glad Bush and the boys took him out.
[/sarcasm]
That dog won't hunt any more.
We all know who lied. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the rest of the PNAC bloody cowboys.
Wilson and Plame are plain old political hacks and shameless opportunists, and Blitzer was totally derelict enabler, in allowing them to just brush aside and divert from the question of Armitage.
Good grief... Valerie Plame again?
Gee, let's discuss Charlemagne and the Charles the Hammer while we're drifting down ancient history lane.
I wanna talk about this guy:
Why was he issued a press pass?
Good grief... Valerie Plame again?
Gee, let's discuss Charlemagne and the Charles the Hammer while we're drifting down ancient history lane.
I wanna talk about this guy:
Why was he issued a press pass?
Did they name Richard Armitage as a traitor, too?
Nope.
Gee, I didn't hear that question asked. Were they asked about Benedict Arnold too?