I'm sorry to initerrupt, but I can't help but wonder why whatever Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, etc etc told you was good enough? Only Obama's word is not good enough. Why is that?
I understand that it was tongue-in-cheek, but the question is certainly not an interruption: it is exactly to the point.
Any questions about political figures serves as fodder for a message board, and I recall all kinds of debates re: Presidents Bush and Clinton...I'm sure you'll recall some of them. President Clinton fathering illegitimate children and the Clintons bumping off all kinds of 'enemies,' whether President Bush was AWOL, etc....
And that is exactly why the OP is pertinent, as well.
"I ask that in the light of the multitude of questioning threads on this board as to his (President Obama's) birth, the provenance of his academic philosophy, and his approach to governance."
Contrary to what friend GT implies, there is much we don't know re: this President.
True?
Perhaps true. Have you not read either one of his books? Or do his books about his life do not count?
No, I didn't read either.
What, exactly, did you find in same that you find dispositive in this thread?