Why are Republicans afraid of Ron Paul?

It quit working when people figured out how to beat the system.


bwahahahahahahahahaha.....I just lol'd.

Are you fo' fucking serious?



What part is over your head?

Affinity groups band together for that which they want from government. Let me ask you the question Oddball ducked.

Say we snapped our fingers and had your perfect Libertarian legislated society.

Some lazy assholes were starving in the innercity. They wanted some free food lest they starve, and all the bleeding hearts threw in with them because it was the right thing to do to feed them. Then their neighbors all saw it and said to themselves 'hmmm. This is the right thing to do.' Now, we have no laws yet. Soon, all of these like minded do-gooders, and the lazy fucks, decided that it would be good to have a tax to raise money to feed the lazy fucks, because hey - it would be good for the entire community not to have starving freeloaders running around. These people are the majority of voters in the community.

The question to you, libertarian fool, is there some fascist way for you to stop your pure libertarianism from being violated by the passing of such a law?
 
p.s. liberals are not better. They clamor for individual freedom, yet look for the state to grant them it, often times violating someone's elses freedom. So, please keep your strawman arguments to yourself.
Liberals understand that rights are inalienable, granted by no one and no government. They also understand that although inalienable, rights are not absolute. The Constitution both prevents government excess and legitimizes government’s regulatory authority. Liberals understand the Constitution’s case law establishes the boundary between each realm, and that the courts are the venue in which the people “petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” and to seek remedy from alleged government excess.

Conservatives and libertarians are free to practice their naïve, reactionary dogma as they see fit, provided they acknowledge the above.

I actually like the ideals to which libertarians aspire. I just think it unworkable as a political philosophy.

Now, I can't stand commie asswipes.
 
My "lame assed theory" worked in America for more than 150 years....This is a fact that you cannot deny.

It quit working when republican wimps started believing that they could appease and mollify socialist looters....Now, they're reduced to claiming that the socialistic moocher state could work, if only it was they that were in control of it.

You surrendered nearly a century before you were even born, pal.


um, no. It quit working when people figured out how to beat the system. Like minded interests banded together to get what they wanted. Just like they have done in every society, every culture, every nation. Why? Because of human nature.

Happens every time.

Do you agree, it happens every time? Every fucking time?

It is human nature, you know.
The system didn't get beat until gullible pussies got suckered into believing that those seeking to beat that system wouldn't use those powers for ill intent.

Like I said, they beat the system.

Happens every time.

Every fucking time. Human nature.


Agreed?
 
It quit working when people figured out how to beat the system.


bwahahahahahahahahaha.....I just lol'd.

Are you fo' fucking serious?



What part is over your head?

Affinity groups band together for that which they want from government. Let me ask you the question Oddball ducked.

Say we snapped our fingers and had your perfect Libertarian legislated society.

Some lazy assholes were starving in the innercity. They wanted some free food lest they starve, and all the bleeding hearts threw in with them because it was the right thing to do to feed them. Then their neighbors all saw it and said to themselves 'hmmm. This is the right thing to do.' Now, we have no laws yet. Soon, all of these like minded do-gooders, and the lazy fucks, decided that it would be good to have a tax to raise money to feed the lazy fucks, because hey - it would be good for the entire community not to have starving freeloaders running around. These people are the majority of voters in the community.

The question to you, libertarian fool, is there some fascist way for you to stop your pure libertarianism from being violated by the passing of such a law?

This is a 10 and worth reading again. :clap2:
 
Last edited:
um, no. It quit working when people figured out how to beat the system. Like minded interests banded together to get what they wanted. Just like they have done in every society, every culture, every nation. Why? Because of human nature.

Happens every time.

Do you agree, it happens every time? Every fucking time?

It is human nature, you know.
The system didn't get beat until gullible pussies got suckered into believing that those seeking to beat that system wouldn't use those powers for ill intent.

Like I said, they beat the system.

Happens every time.

Every fucking time.


Agreed?
They don't win until you capitulate.

How long are you willing to rationalize being a loser?
 
bwahahahahahahahahaha.....I just lol'd.

Are you fo' fucking serious?



What part is over your head?

Affinity groups band together for that which they want from government. Let me ask you the question Oddball ducked.

Say we snapped our fingers and had your perfect Libertarian legislated society.

Some lazy assholes were starving in the innercity. They wanted some free food lest they starve, and all the bleeding hearts threw in with them because it was the right thing to do to feed them. Then their neighbors all saw it and said to themselves 'hmmm. This is the right thing to do.' Now, we have no laws yet. Soon, all of these like minded do-gooders, and the lazy fucks, decided that it would be good to have a tax to raise money to feed the lazy fucks, because hey - it would be good for the entire community not to have starving freeloaders running around. These people are the majority of voters in the community.

The question to you, libertarian fool, is there some fascist way for you to stop your pure libertarianism from being violated by the passing of such a law?

This is a 10 and worth reading again.

I accept your punt and return it for a TD.

I win, as usual.
 
The system didn't get beat until gullible pussies got suckered into believing that those seeking to beat that system wouldn't use those powers for ill intent.

Like I said, they beat the system.

Happens every time.

Every fucking time.


Agreed?
They don't win until you capitulate.

How long are you willing to rationalize being a loser?

You are trying to make it personal, but I would point out to you that such affinity groups are formed in every society that has ever existed in the history of the world. And this is just human nature.

Do you agree?
 
What part is over your head?

Affinity groups band together for that which they want from government. Let me ask you the question Oddball ducked.

Say we snapped our fingers and had your perfect Libertarian legislated society.

Some lazy assholes were starving in the innercity. They wanted some free food lest they starve, and all the bleeding hearts threw in with them because it was the right thing to do to feed them. Then their neighbors all saw it and said to themselves 'hmmm. This is the right thing to do.' Now, we have no laws yet. Soon, all of these like minded do-gooders, and the lazy fucks, decided that it would be good to have a tax to raise money to feed the lazy fucks, because hey - it would be good for the entire community not to have starving freeloaders running around. These people are the majority of voters in the community.

The question to you, libertarian fool, is there some fascist way for you to stop your pure libertarianism from being violated by the passing of such a law?

This is a 10 and worth reading again.

I accept your punt and return it for a TD.

I win, as usual.

um...no.

Try again.
 
This is a 10 and worth reading again.

I accept your punt and return it for a TD.

I win, as usual.

um...no.

Try again.

Are you saying your perfect Libertarian society would have some sort of constitution which prohibits the making of laws to feed the needy?



Or is your head just spinning from the thorough ass kicking I am laying upon you?


Can you answer the direct question, or is it time for you to log off?
 
I accept your punt and return it for a TD.

I win, as usual.

um...no.

Try again.

Are you saying your perfect Libertarian society would have some sort of constitution which prohibits the making of laws to feed the needy?



Or is your head just spinning from the thorough ass kicking I am laying upon you?


Can you answer the direct question, or is it time for you to log off?

I don't believe in a perfect society, but that does not stop me from laughing at you.

While I am skeptical of Constitutions, I am against forcing anyone to feed anyone else, besides an unemancipated adult.
 
Like I said, they beat the system.

Happens every time.

Every fucking time.


Agreed?
They don't win until you capitulate.

How long are you willing to rationalize being a loser?

You are trying to make it personal, but I would point out to you that such affinity groups are formed in every society that has ever existed in the history of the world. And this is just human nature.

Do you agree?
And I already pointed out to you that such a society DID exist, in America for over a century and a half, despite all the political affinity groups.

You're just trying to make excuses for capitulators and losers, and I'm not buying the bullshit.

Now, we're coming to the time of nut up or shut up, and you're choosing shut up.

Sucks to be you.
 
um...no.

Try again.

Are you saying your perfect Libertarian society would have some sort of constitution which prohibits the making of laws to feed the needy?



Or is your head just spinning from the thorough ass kicking I am laying upon you?


Can you answer the direct question, or is it time for you to log off?

I don't believe in a perfect society, but that does not stop me from laughing at you.

While I am skeptical of Constitutions, I am against forcing anyone to feed anyone else, besides an unemancipated adult.

But you don't seem to be understanding the question. This isn't about you. Would your perfect society have a constitution to PREVENT majority of voters from passing tax laws to feed the needy?
 
They don't win until you capitulate.

How long are you willing to rationalize being a loser?

You are trying to make it personal, but I would point out to you that such affinity groups are formed in every society that has ever existed in the history of the world. And this is just human nature.

Do you agree?
And I already pointed out to you that such a society DID exist, in America for over a century and a half, despite all the political affinity groups.

/QUOTE]

You could argue it sort of kinda existed for a brief period of time, thanks to our very unique ability to just move further west and grab new natural resources if we couldn't get along.

But alas, the inevitable happened. Human nature creeped in. The affinity groups banded together and got what they wanted. It happens every time.

Do you agree it has happened in EVERY SOCIETY EVERY CULTURE EVERY NATION THAT HAS EVER FUCKING EXISTED OR NOT?
 
Hey ODDball,


Would your theoretical Liberatarian society have a constitution to prevent laws to feed the needy, or not?

Perhaps your core political philosophy is in fact, impractical daydreaming bullshit?
 
I don't want anyone THAT old with their finger on the button. You usually don't find out they have alzheimer's until AFTER they do something insane.
 
You are trying to make it personal, but I would point out to you that such affinity groups are formed in every society that has ever existed in the history of the world. And this is just human nature.

Do you agree?
And I already pointed out to you that such a society DID exist, in America for over a century and a half, despite all the political affinity groups.

/QUOTE]

You could argue it sort of kinda existed for a brief period of time, thanks to our very unique ability to just move further west and grab new natural resources if we couldn't get along.

But alas, the inevitable happened. Human nature creeped in. The affinity groups banded together and got what they wanted. It happens every time.

Do you agree it has happened in EVERY SOCIETY EVERY CULTURE EVERY NATION THAT HAS EVER FUCKING EXISTED OR NOT?
I'm not going to get sucked into accepting your flawed premises.

You want to make excuses for being a GOP party man butt boy, that's your funeral...You get the despotism you deserve.

Better you than me.
 
And I already pointed out to you that such a society DID exist, in America for over a century and a half, despite all the political affinity groups.

/QUOTE]

You could argue it sort of kinda existed for a brief period of time, thanks to our very unique ability to just move further west and grab new natural resources if we couldn't get along.

But alas, the inevitable happened. Human nature creeped in. The affinity groups banded together and got what they wanted. It happens every time.

Do you agree it has happened in EVERY SOCIETY EVERY CULTURE EVERY NATION THAT HAS EVER FUCKING EXISTED OR NOT?
I'm not going to get sucked into accepting your flawed premises.

You are getting your teeth kicked in. There is no flawed premise here. The premise is that human nature makes Liberatarianism just as unworkable in real life as Communism.

This is FACT as easily demonstrated by the totality of world history. Not to mention common sense.

You aren't the first Libertarian I have eviscerated with simple logic, you know.

You can live in a fantasy land, but don't take it out on those of us who accept the real world and use our two party system as best we can.
 
You are getting your teeth kicked in. There is no flawed premise here. The premise is that human nature makes Liberatarianism just as unworkable in real life as Communism.

This is FACT as easily demonstrated by the totality of world history. Not to mention common sense.

You aren't the first Libertarian I have eviscerated with simple logic, you know.

You can live in a fantasy land, but don't take it out on those of us who accept the real world and use our two party system as best we can.
Wow, you can declare victory for yourself.....Maybe you can now step up your game and go after Independent of Logic, and have yourselves a fabulous mutual masturbation festival.

Fucking putz.
 
Last edited:
Okay, how about this then. Ron doesn't give a hoot about those hoity toity "chosen ones" in the middle east and republicans want into heaven but it ain't gonna happen if you snub your nose and turn your back on god's favorite humans. The special chosen people are the little people's ticket into heaven if we back them up and Ron would mess all that up for the superstitious republicans..
 
You are getting your teeth kicked in. There is no flawed premise here. The premise is that human nature makes Liberatarianism just as unworkable in real life as Communism.

This is FACT as easily demonstrated by the totality of world history. Not to mention common sense.

You aren't the first Libertarian I have eviscerated with simple logic, you know.

You can live in a fantasy land, but don't take it out on those of us who accept the real world and use our two party system as best we can.
Wow, you can declare victory for yourself.....Maybe you can now step up your game and go after Independent of Logic, and have yourselves a fabulous mutual masturbation festival.

Fucking putz.

I find it painful to correct right-leaning misguided Libertarians, but it is necessary to demonstrate that as well-intentioned people such as Ron Paul are, they are just fools and a sideshow to the serious task of government.
 

Forum List

Back
Top