Who Needs To Adjust More, Blacks to Whites, or Whites to Blacks?

[Asclepias]

Wrong. Ebonics has a written component. Dont claim things when you are ignorant of the facts.

Really? I suppose you can link to some published works written in ebonics

Yes I can but what would you be willing to lose when I provide the links? I love it when you ignorant whites have no clue about things.

Go ahead

I have no problem admitting if I'm wrong

So how about an American history text written in ebonics hell any other text book would do

and Dictionaries don't count

But I think I know where you are going here and books with ebonics reflected in the quotes of characters is not the same as a book written entirely in ebonics .

Dont try to move the goal post. I bet you googled and saw what a dumbass you were.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

https://smile.amazon.com/Begging-Ch...encoding=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0&ie=UTF8

 

[Skull Pilot]

Really? I suppose you can link to some published works written in ebonics

Yes I can but what would you be willing to lose when I provide the links? I love it when you ignorant whites have no clue about things.

Go ahead

I have no problem admitting if I'm wrong

So how about an American history text written in ebonics hell any other text book would do

and Dictionaries don't count

But I think I know where you are going here and books with ebonics reflected in the quotes of characters is not the same as a book written entirely in ebonics .

Dont try to move the goal post. I bet you googled and saw what a dumbass you were.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

 

[Asclepias]

Yes I can but what would you be willing to lose when I provide the links? I love it when you ignorant whites have no clue about things.

Go ahead

I have no problem admitting if I'm wrong

So how about an American history text written in ebonics hell any other text book would do

and Dictionaries don't count

But I think I know where you are going here and books with ebonics reflected in the quotes of characters is not the same as a book written entirely in ebonics .

Dont try to move the goal post. I bet you googled and saw what a dumbass you were.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english. How you feelin bout now?

 

[Indeependent]

Yes I can but what would you be willing to lose when I provide the links? I love it when you ignorant whites have no clue about things.

Go ahead

I have no problem admitting if I'm wrong

So how about an American history text written in ebonics hell any other text book would do

and Dictionaries don't count

But I think I know where you are going here and books with ebonics reflected in the quotes of characters is not the same as a book written entirely in ebonics .

Dont try to move the goal post. I bet you googled and saw what a dumbass you were.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

Ahmuzon?

I found an elementary ebonics book

C D B

( See the Bee)

https://www.amazon.com/C-D-B-William-Steig/dp/0671666894&tag=ff0d01-20

Ass published it last night.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Go ahead

I have no problem admitting if I'm wrong

So how about an American history text written in ebonics hell any other text book would do

and Dictionaries don't count

But I think I know where you are going here and books with ebonics reflected in the quotes of characters is not the same as a book written entirely in ebonics .

Dont try to move the goal post. I bet you googled and saw what a dumbass you were.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english.

Go ahead

I have no problem admitting if I'm wrong

So how about an American history text written in ebonics hell any other text book would do

and Dictionaries don't count

But I think I know where you are going here and books with ebonics reflected in the quotes of characters is not the same as a book written entirely in ebonics .

Dont try to move the goal post. I bet you googled and saw what a dumbass you were.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english.

Sorry but no
The first sentence sure isn't ebonics it's standard English and it's not a quote

Here's a bit of the book

Daddy's eyes are half open. And he can't stand still unless he's holding on to something or sitting down on Momma's bed...

again not a quote and not ebonics

How would you write that sentence in ebonics?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

[
Really? I suppose you can link to some published works written in ebonics

Br'er rabbit?

 

[Asclepias]

Dont try to move the goal post. I bet you googled and saw what a dumbass you were.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english.

Dont try to move the goal post. I bet you googled and saw what a dumbass you were.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english.

Sorry but no
The first sentence sure isn't ebonics it's standard English and it's not a quote

And this is exactly why I say whites are ignorant.

 

[Skull Pilot]

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english.

I'm not I asked you for a published work written in ebonics not a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples

you too stupid to see the difference?

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english.

Sorry but no
The first sentence sure isn't ebonics it's standard English and it's not a quote

And this is exactly why I say whites are ignorant.

View attachment 208138

That wasn't the first sentence

and just from the 2 pages I glanced at there are many standard English sentences that are not quotes as there are that other gibberish

So I guess ebonics is just poor standard English and not its own thing

 

[Asclepias]

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english.

No you are the stupid one. You didnt exclude a published work written in standard English with ebonics examples so thats moving the goal posts.

If there were not standard english speakers around then you would have a point but most if not all books will have some standard english simply because there is going to be a time when the characters encounter someone that speaks standard english.

I asked you for a published book written in ebonics not written in standard English

If you were correct in saying a book written in standard English that had some quoted ebonics dialect in it is the same thing as a book written in ebonics then a book written in standard English that has a quote in Spanish is the same a a book written in Spanish

U c da diffrenz ?

It was written in Ebonics. It just has some characters that speak standard english.

Sorry but no
The first sentence sure isn't ebonics it's standard English and it's not a quote

And this is exactly why I say whites are ignorant.

View attachment 208138

That wasn't the first sentence

and just from the 2 pages I glanced at there are many standard English sentences that are not quotes as there are that other gibberish

So I guess ebonics is just poor standard English and not its own thing

Doesnt have to be the first sentence. The point is you wouldnt know Ebonics if it kicked you in the ass.

 

[MizMolly]

I agree that blacks probably interact with whites more. I dont know what kind of adjustments are needed.

 

[OldLady]

I guarantee you all of that will be too complex for him to handle.

LOL Apparently so.

You realize what an idiot you are on this subject?
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson created an endless pool of uneducated Blacks and made up a name for their bad English.

No, formal linguists studied the dialect and figured it out.

The poor crackers in Appalachia have their own dialect as well but they would still sound more intelligent if they spoke formal English.

Thats only if you value standard american english as sounding intelligent. I dont. I see white people with standard american english sounding dumber than the most backwoods hillbilly.

You're talking shit to make a point, right?
Because that is the goddamndest advice to give any kid anywhere. Doesn't mean they have to speak standard American English at home, but they had best know it if they want their words (their ideas) to be respected.

 

[OldLady]

You speak english and you dont sound smart so what makes you think it would be any different from you?

You've never heard me speak

Youve never heard me speak either.

You can't sound intelligent while speaking ebonics

Of course you can. What you meant to say is that some people think you cant sound intelligent when you speak Ebonics.

No I didn't mean that at all

you be seein what i'm sayn?

Simplifying the irregular verb.^^^^^^

 

[OldLady]

LOL Apparently so.

You realize what an idiot you are on this subject?
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson created an endless pool of uneducated Blacks and made up a name for their bad English.

No, formal linguists studied the dialect and figured it out.

The poor crackers in Appalachia have their own dialect as well but they would still sound more intelligent if they spoke formal English.

Thats only if you value standard american english as sounding intelligent. I dont. I see white people with standard american english sounding dumber than the most backwoods hillbilly.

SHo nuff

^^^^Southern accent

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Eeebonikz...it’s not just for du bruduhz ehneemoor.

 

[Rocko]

For instance, who do you think has more of which friends, acquaintances, colleagues or co-workers...

Do whites have more black friends that the typical black, or do blacks have more white friends than the typical white?

Are whites more often in black-only, or mostly-black spaces, or are blacks more often in white-only and/or mostly-white spaces?

How about schools? Do more whites attend all-black or mostly-black schools, or more blacks attend all-white and/or mostly-white schools?

Same for work.

Do you think the average white interacts w/more blacks than the average black interacts w/whites?

Do you think that more whites live in black communities, or more blacks live in white communities/mostly white communities.

In your opinion....Who has more interaction w/who?

Clearly we're talking percentages here.

What a stupid question by someone who is obsessed with race

 

[harmonica]

People who focus on race are generally unhappy losers who blame everyone but themselves for their problems, no matter what color they are.

winner!!!!!!!

 

[harmonica]

obviously the blacks need to cut their crime down and up their graduation rates
...also, they need to stop complaining about fake racial crap--like criminals attacking cops being shot
OMG!!!!!!!!!---a criminal who attacked a cop got shot !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
POLICE BRUTALITY!!!!!!!!

 

[Asclepias]

LOL Apparently so.

You realize what an idiot you are on this subject?
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson created an endless pool of uneducated Blacks and made up a name for their bad English.

No, formal linguists studied the dialect and figured it out.

The poor crackers in Appalachia have their own dialect as well but they would still sound more intelligent if they spoke formal English.

Thats only if you value standard american english as sounding intelligent. I dont. I see white people with standard american english sounding dumber than the most backwoods hillbilly.

You're talking shit to make a point, right?
Because that is the goddamndest advice to give any kid anywhere. Doesn't mean they have to speak standard American English at home, but they had best know it if they want their words (their ideas) to be respected.

No.I'm not talking shit to make a point. I am dead serious. I consider english to be the language of liars. When you look at how its constructed there is no agreement and endless loopholes. You as a teacher should know this better than most. My advice to children is that they must learn standard english but dont ever put it above your own language/s

 

[Indeependent]

Eeebonikz...it’s not just for du bruduhz ehneemoor.

Oh man!
Memories!

 

[Indeependent]

You realize what an idiot you are on this subject?
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson created an endless pool of uneducated Blacks and made up a name for their bad English.

No, formal linguists studied the dialect and figured it out.

The poor crackers in Appalachia have their own dialect as well but they would still sound more intelligent if they spoke formal English.

Thats only if you value standard american english as sounding intelligent. I dont. I see white people with standard american english sounding dumber than the most backwoods hillbilly.

You're talking shit to make a point, right?
Because that is the goddamndest advice to give any kid anywhere. Doesn't mean they have to speak standard American English at home, but they had best know it if they want their words (their ideas) to be respected.

No.I'm not talking shit to make a point. I am dead serious. I consider english to be the language of liars. When you look at how its constructed there is no agreement and endless loopholes. You as a teacher should know this better than most. My advice to children is that they must learn standard english but dont ever put it above your own language/s

How is the fact that you do not know how to properly construct a sentence anyone else’s problem other than your own?