TruthNotBS
Gold Member
- Mar 20, 2023
- 2,287
- 899
- 208
ROFLMAO-----mr. man imagines that RASHI, an 11th century rabbi who lived in
Framce -----somehow agrees with mr. man's english translation of Hebrew. Rashi
was VERY precise----he did translate---for the sake of example---into French---not
english. MICHAEL IS NOT A "question" in hebrew
He interprets Elohim as "judge", because the kings of Israel are also judges. They function as judges. Remember the story of the two women fighting over the baby? Solomon gives the verdict. Cut the baby in two..as a ruse, to find who was actually the mother. The mother pleads " don't kill him, give the baby to her". The woman who said that, is the mother. The kings of Israel are judges. They like the judges are identified as Elohim because they function as/for Elohim. We can debate on how exactly they are like Elohim, but nonetheless, the text is explicitly identifying these human servants as "Elohim". The shaliach and the one who sends him, are as ONE.
Joseph wore the ring of Pharaoh, bearing His royal seal and Name. He was, for all intents and purposes, Pharaoh.. He was second to the actual Pharoah. Similar idea. The Sar Gadol in heaven, Michael, bears the Seal of YHWH. After his incarnation, martyrdom, and resurrection, he is known as Yehoshua/Joshua/Jesus = Salvation of YHWH. That's what his name means.
Last edited: