If there is a God then why does he rely upon the gullible to be his followers?
If that is the criterion for the existence of God, that his followers believe and have faith that miracles were performed by channeling his power then it should be easy enough to do it again, right?
Christianity is the largest religion in the entire world. Plenty of them are currently praying for those suffering with Ebola. What are they asking of their God? That he free them of this pestilence? And what do we see happening? We see mankind mobilizing to free itself of this pestilence.
Therefore we are our own God. We created our God, we performed the miracles that we give him credit for but collectively We the People are God.
Does that answer your question?
Gullible?
Let's examine where 'gullible' really applies.
"The Left says of the Right, “You fools, it is demonstrable that dinosaurs lived one hundred million years ago, I can prove it to you, how can you say the earth was created in 4000BCE?” But this supposed intransigence on the part of the Religious Right is far less detrimental to the health of the body politic than the Left’s love affair with Marxism, Socialism, Racialism, the Command Economy, all of which have been proven via one hundred years of evidence shows only shortages, despotism and murder."
David Mamet
Try this....if you say 'orange' really slowly, it sounds just like 'gullible.'
Is that supposed to be an endorsement of your brand of religious fundamentalism - that you're not quite as bad as the mind numbing, leveling blade of totalitarianism?
Good for you. Theocratic totalitarianism is not quite as bad as political totalitarianism.
Jeebus! You managed to denigrate your own argument with your cutting and pasting. Not a first for you as your attempt at argument is nothing more than cutting and pasting.