What should be the borders of Israel and Palestine?

Assume that all of us can agree that ultimately

1) The Palestinians should have their own country.
2) Israel should have defensible borders.

With those two conditions what should be the borders of the two nations? You can rule out the pre 1967 borders as those borders reduce Israel to such a narrow strip (14 miles IIRC near Tel Aviv) that the country would be basically indefensible
Bullshit! The '67 borders are the only borders that will satisfy UN resolution 242.

Israel is a fascist, barbaric country that can go to hell! Fuck Israel! They are a cancer to this planet!
 
Bullshit! The '67 borders are the only borders that will satisfy UN resolution 242.

Israel is a fascist, barbaric country that can go to hell! Fuck Israel! They are a cancer to this planet!

The '67 borders are the only borders that will satisfy UN resolution 242.

What were the '67 borders?
 
Bullshit! The '67 borders are the only borders that will satisfy UN resolution 242.
States can not acquire territory by aggression or use of force. This applies to equally to all States. The 1949 Armistice Line was created as a direct result of aggression and use of force. It therefore can not be used as a basis for claiming sovereignty.

The irony of this argument is that the prohibition against the acquisition of territory by force is used against Israel, while being a perfectly suitable method for acquiring territory by Arabs.
 
Isreal was established in the 1940's based on the area was their home land 2000 years ago.
A good argument.
Based on the logic American Indians should have rights to the USA. It was their homeland 2000 years ago.
we do.
 
Assume that all of us can agree that ultimately

1) The Palestinians should have their own country.
2) Israel should have defensible borders.

With those two conditions what should be the borders of the two nations? You can rule out the pre 1967 borders as those borders reduce Israel to such a narrow strip (14 miles IIRC near Tel Aviv) that the country would be basically indefensible
They already have a Palestinian country. Its called Jordan.
 
Our country obtained its"self-determination and sovereignty through raw force of arms.
Sure. But it's not the only way to achieve self-determination and sovereignty. And it doesn't address the inherent rights of peoples.
 
No needs to prove any thing to Elmer or Dayton.

History is clear Euro-Americans assisted by indigenous peoples and blacks took the country from the inhabitants, indigenous and Mexican.

That is not going to change.
 

Forum List

Back
Top