- Thread starter
- #21
Attorneys who are experts in National Security have already called this a felony.
Moss believes that there’s a legal case to charge Trump for his comments, because he was calling for Russia to take “imminent lawless action,” which is speech not covered by the First Amendment.
Moss added that Trump could theoretically be charged as a conspirator under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
“You could argue what Trump was urging Russia to do was hack Hillary’s server and release the contents to the media -- conspiring with them to hack into a private server and release confidential information to the public,” Moss explained.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yup, your buy crossed the line on this one!
Moss believes that there’s a legal case to charge Trump for his comments, because he was calling for Russia to take “imminent lawless action,” which is speech not covered by the First Amendment.
Moss added that Trump could theoretically be charged as a conspirator under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
“You could argue what Trump was urging Russia to do was hack Hillary’s server and release the contents to the media -- conspiring with them to hack into a private server and release confidential information to the public,” Moss explained.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yup, your buy crossed the line on this one!