Biden’s DOJ Used 1917 Espionage Act That Involves “Two or More Persons Go In Disguise on the Highway” in Latest Indictment Against President Trump

[MAGA Macho Man]

This is the most bogus indictment I've ever seen. It's weak as hell and it should be thrown out. Read this!

BANANA REPUBLIC: Biden's DOJ Used Law with Civil War Origin that Also Involves "Two or More Persons Go In Disguise on the Highway" in Latest Indictment Against President Trump | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Once again, President Trump was indicted on Tuesday – the DAY AFTER Hunter Biden’s best friend and business associate Devon Archer testified that Joe Biden was included on 20 calls when his son was sitting with foreign officials arranging influence peddling deals for the family.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The fourth charge: “conspiracy against rights” comes under 18 U.S.C. 241.

So what is 18 U.S.C. 241?

18 U.S.C. 241 comes from the 1917 espionage act and involves “two or more persons go in disguise on the highway.”

Kash Patel provides the details.

Kash Patel
@Kash


This is the statute they used to charge Trump- from before the 1917 espionage act used in first indictment… ‘two or more persons go in disguise on the highway’- yes you read that right. Talk about DOJ highway robbery on their two tier system of justice

 

[Catsnmeters]

This is the most bogus indictment I've ever seen. It's weak as hell and it should be thrown out. Read this!

BANANA REPUBLIC: Biden's DOJ Used Law with Civil War Origin that Also Involves "Two or More Persons Go In Disguise on the Highway" in Latest Indictment Against President Trump | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Once again, President Trump was indicted on Tuesday – the DAY AFTER Hunter Biden’s best friend and business associate Devon Archer testified that Joe Biden was included on 20 calls when his son was sitting with foreign officials arranging influence peddling deals for the family.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The fourth charge: “conspiracy against rights” comes under 18 U.S.C. 241.

So what is 18 U.S.C. 241?

18 U.S.C. 241 comes from the 1917 espionage act and involves “two or more persons go in disguise on the highway.”

Kash Patel provides the details.

Kash Patel
@Kash


This is the statute they used to charge Trump- from before the 1917 espionage act used in first indictment… ‘two or more persons go in disguise on the highway’- yes you read that right. Talk about DOJ highway robbery on their two tier system of justice

Why is he and you ignoring the first paragraph?

Are you ok?

 

[kyzr]

Turley calls Smith indictment "haiku"...

Jonathan Turley Just Gutted the Jan 6 Indictment Against Trump

townhall.com

The issue here is that there has been a slew of Democratic senators who have made similar points in fruitless attempts to challenge an election. We’ve seen this since at least 2004. According to Turley, the legal maneuver with the electors Trump tried to pull was bad legal advice, but that’s also not illegal. He further eviscerated the charges on Twitter:

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why is he and you ignoring the first paragraph?

Are you ok?

That is what they are paid to do

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The issue here is that there has been a slew of Democratic senators who have made similar points in fruitless attempts to challenge an election.

Can you list all the Senators from either party that worked to get fake electors from multiple states entered into the official record?

I will be happy to wait while you compile the list

 

[kyzr]

Can you list all the Senators from either party that worked to get fake electors from multiple states entered into the official record?
I will be happy to wait while you compile the list

That's not the indictment, its "challenging an election". Read Turley's comment again:
"The issue here is that there has been a slew of Democratic senators who have made similar points in fruitless attempts to challenge an election. We’ve seen this since at least 2004. According to Turley, the legal maneuver with the electors Trump tried to pull was bad legal advice, but that’s also not illegal. He further eviscerated the charges on Twitter"

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That's not the indictment, its "challenging an election". Read Turley's comment again:
"The issue here is that there has been a slew of Democratic senators who have made similar points in fruitless attempts to challenge an election. We’ve seen this since at least 2004. According to Turley, the legal maneuver with the electors Trump tried to pull was bad legal advice, but that’s also not illegal. He further eviscerated the charges on Twitter"

You seem to put a lot more stock in Turley than I do.

Eventually there may be a trial and we will actually find out what they have on Trump or do not have.

 

[22lcidw]

Can you list all the Senators from either party that worked to get fake electors from multiple states entered into the official record?

I will be happy to wait while you compile the list

I notice how the Prog Senators and Reps have acted like. They act like Soviet Communist party members of privilege. The proof in anything of authoritarians is how they act and live while forcing their agendas on others. We saw that with COVID. And yet the proletariat continued to genuflect to them. This is dangerous. Today's Progs would never have had any traction with the Founding Fathers. Hell, they would have been despised by King George during revolutionary times. They are dictators on the level of many despots in history. Only they have not exterminated their designated hated groups yet as we still have money.

 

[Catsnmeters]

I notice how the Prog Senators and Reps have acted like. They act like Soviet Communist party members of privilege. The proof in anything of authoritarians is how they act and live while forcing their agendas on others. We saw that with COVID. And yet the proletariat continued to genuflect to them. This is dangerous. Today's Progs would never have had any traction with the Founding Fathers. Hell, they would have been despised by King George during revolutionary times. They are dictators on the level of many despots in history. Only they have not exterminated their designated hated groups yet as we still have money.

You could have just "no" in answer to his question instead of a rant.