there is as much evidence to show that martin attacked zimmerman as there is to show that zimmerman attacked martin - which is to say absolutely noneI don't think you understand the meaning of the word "evidence".lol. so all you've proven is that Martin was successfullydefending himself. if he had successfully defended himself with a gun he'd be alive and freeIf you think there wasn't evidence to support his claim, you clearly didn't follow this case. Aside from the physical evidence, which there was plenty of, there was an eye witness who saw Trayvon "ground and pounding zimmerman".Zimmerman did it.I don't know what makes you think you can get away with killing someone with a gun by simply stating "he attacked me". You would need evidence to support that claim.In your S&M dreams, Trayvon is in jail.