The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

[IM2]

How about when the GAO found that Obama violated section 503 of the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, and the Antideficiency Act by over-spending on secret service by $5,100,000 (five-million one-hundred thousand dollars) in 2009, and diverting those funds from another agency. Is that personal enough for you?

So? Republicans controlled both houses of Congress. Look, you don't get to keep posting bullshit about what Obama did unless it's the exact same thing as what trump did. So you go find a credible source that shows that in 2008 and 2012, Obama sought help from foreign countries to win elections, then we can talk.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Why didn't the republican congress move for impeachment?

Because learned from the Clinton sham.

Which you mother fuckers haven't.

Can you assholes be any more inept ?

 

[gipper]

O should have been impeached and removed for half a dozen things. F&F, IRS scandal that benefited his re-election, lying about Benghazi where he failed to assist Americans fighting in a war zone, creating ISIS, arming terrorists in Syria, droning Americans ...all come to mind.

Problem was he’s black and Rs tremble at being called racist. Plus Ears had total support of the MSM, Deep State, and the billionaires. He is above the law.

 

[iceberg]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke the Law kid, there is no difference

Lol, yes there is.

Only for a brain dead Prog

INTENT. Look it up.

Prove his INTENT.

Or shut it up.

 

[iceberg]

Impeach him now. Apparently we have liberties with timeliness.

In any event that will show em.

He's been impeached.

That explains him still in office.

 

[iceberg]

Why didn't the republican congress move for impeachment?

Cause they were not being petty asswhipes?

They were the definition of petty. The reality here is that trump uses the office for personal gain and he has consistently violated the constitution.

The reality is you are a dumbass.

 

[TheParser]

We are not children.

We all know that the election of President Obama was a historic event in this country's story.

Even the Republicans would not have dared to seriously consider the impeachment of President Obama.

Everyone knew that such a move would have set off civil unrest throughout the land.

 

[Claudette]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He did do it though. He broke the law 7 times yet I didn't hear anyone yelling for his impeachment.

I sit here and LMAO at Pelousy's impeachment shit show. What a moron.

 

[my2¢]

By 2014 Obama was getting to be pretty much a lame duck and so the Republicans didn't want to distract from what they had going against their main political target, that being Hillary.

 

[Nostra]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke the Law kid, there is no difference

So, it's OK to violate the law if you don't benefit personally?

That's a new one.

 

[Crepitus]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke it 7 times lol

Can you not read?

 

[wamose]

In light of our budget deficit, the GAO is a totally expendable dept. In fact, any dept. that is politically biased is expendable. Politically biased depts. do our country more harm than good. Career bureaucrats have highjacked our government. Term limits for bureaucrats might help.

 

[Crepitus]

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke the Law kid, there is no difference

Lol, yes there is.

Only for a brain dead Prog

INTENT. Look it up.

Prove his INTENT.

Or shut it up.

Lol, nope. You want to prove he did it for personal gain you prove his intent.

 

[NightFox]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

LOL, so now it's okay to break the law as long as your motive isn't for "personal benefit"?

What do they call this idiotic legal system that exists on the planet you inhabit?

 

[iceberg]

He broke the Law kid, there is no difference

Lol, yes there is.

Only for a brain dead Prog

INTENT. Look it up.

Prove his INTENT.

Or shut it up.

Lol, nope. You want to prove he did it for personal gain you prove his intent.

I'm not accusing him, ergo.... Fuck you.

 

[Crepitus]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

LOL, so now it's okay to break the law as long as your motive isn't for "personal benefit"?

What do they call this idiotic legal system that exists on the planet you inhabit?

Can't have been that big a deal if it took them years to get around to telling us.

 

[Crepitus]

Lol, yes there is.

Only for a brain dead Prog

INTENT. Look it up.

Prove his INTENT.

Or shut it up.

Lol, nope. You want to prove he did it for personal gain you prove his intent.

I'm not accusing him, ergo.... Fuck you.

Look out guys! She's backing up!

 

[iceberg]

Only for a brain dead Prog

INTENT. Look it up.

Prove his INTENT.

Or shut it up.

Lol, nope. You want to prove he did it for personal gain you prove his intent.

I'm not accusing him, ergo.... Fuck you.

Look out guys! She's backing up!

And you are still being an idiot.

The left accused him of digging for dirt and I have yet to see that proven.

Ergo, fuck you.

 

[Crepitus]

INTENT. Look it up.

Prove his INTENT.

Or shut it up.

Lol, nope. You want to prove he did it for personal gain you prove his intent.

I'm not accusing him, ergo.... Fuck you.

Look out guys! She's backing up!

And you are still being an idiot.

The left accused him of digging for dirt and I have yet to see that proven.

Ergo, fuck you.

The left accused Obama of digging dirt?

Do tell!

 

[NightFox]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

LOL, so now it's okay to break the law as long as your motive isn't for "personal benefit"?

What do they call this idiotic legal system that exists on the planet you inhabit?

Can't have been that big a deal if it took them years to get around to telling us.

Er..ummm... that's not the point, the point of my post was to prompt you to justify your implication that breaking the law is okay as long as the motive isn't for "personal benefit".

Do you care to retract that assertion or would you like to keep digging the hole deeper?