The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

[Crepitus]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

LOL, so now it's okay to break the law as long as your motive isn't for "personal benefit"?

What do they call this idiotic legal system that exists on the planet you inhabit?

Can't have been that big a deal if it took them years to get around to telling us.

Er..ummm... that's not the point, the point of my post was to prompt you to justify your implication that breaking the law is okay as long as the motive isn't for "personal benefit".

Do you care to retract that assertion or would you like to keep digging the hole deeper?

That's not anything I said, it's something you made up.

So I have no need to deny it, 'cause I never said it.

 

[Flash]

I have always called called for Obama's impeachment. The biggest corrupt piece of shit to ever hold public office.

 

[NightFox]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

LOL, so now it's okay to break the law as long as your motive isn't for "personal benefit"?

What do they call this idiotic legal system that exists on the planet you inhabit?

Can't have been that big a deal if it took them years to get around to telling us.

Er..ummm... that's not the point, the point of my post was to prompt you to justify your implication that breaking the law is okay as long as the motive isn't for "personal benefit".

Do you care to retract that assertion or would you like to keep digging the hole deeper?

That's not anything I said, it's something you made up.

So I have no need to deny it, 'cause I never said it.

ROFLMAO! you realize that your posts in this thread are still readable, right ? You're not just a liar, you're a really, really BAD liar, YOU and DONALD TRUMP have that in common; he likes to deny he said shit that is recorded for everyone to see and hear.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit

Are you going to try and deny that your statement is an attempt to justify President O'Nimrods illegal actions based on motive? Can't wait to hear this fucking fairy tale.....

 

[Jitss617]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke it 7 times lol

Can you not read?

I can can you?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Obama raped the constitution.
He illegally used the NSA, CIA, IRA, FBI and the DOJ against our citizens.
The Democrats will turn America into a Left Wing Dictatorship the next time that control the House, Senate and Presidency.

 

[Nostra]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

Releasing 5 high ranking terrorists so they can kill more Americans for a traitor to America is very popular with the Dimwinger base.

Personal benefit for Obama.

Next?

 

[depotoo]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke the law. No impeachment.
You’re a Humphrey Bogart wannabe, aren’t ya, kid...

 

[Nostra]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke it 7 times lol

GAO stands for Government Accountability Office, so it's not a law that one can break. To clarify your point, the GAO concluded that the Obama administration violated federal law on 7 occasions.

Barry was black, so he couldn't be held accountable or those holding him accountable for his crimes would be racists.

It's that simple.

 

[BlindBoo]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

So the defense switches from "what law was broken in Trumps Ukraine Shakedown Scheme?" to "look at what Obama did 6 years ago?"

 

[CowboyTed]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Go on, ring your congress man saying you want impeachment of Obama...

This still doesn't make Trump any more innocent

 

[iceberg]

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

LOL, so now it's okay to break the law as long as your motive isn't for "personal benefit"?

What do they call this idiotic legal system that exists on the planet you inhabit?

Can't have been that big a deal if it took them years to get around to telling us.

Er..ummm... that's not the point, the point of my post was to prompt you to justify your implication that breaking the law is okay as long as the motive isn't for "personal benefit".

Do you care to retract that assertion or would you like to keep digging the hole deeper?

That's not anything I said, it's something you made up.

So I have no need to deny it, 'cause I never said it.

ROFLMAO! you realize that your posts in this thread are still readable, right ? You're not just a liar, you're a really, really BAD liar, YOU and DONALD TRUMP have that in common; he likes to deny he said shit that is recorded for everyone to see and hear.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit

Are you going to try and deny that your statement is an attempt to justify President O'Nimrods illegal actions based on motive? Can't wait to hear this fucking fairy tale.....

You couldn't make up a fictional character this stupid cause you'd never think ANYONE would ever be... This stupid.

 

[CowboyTed]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Fucksake, I heard his motorcade broke a red light in Ireland... Why wasn't a firing squad called immediately?


This was his time he was an obvious NAZI

How about a crime on Fashion, shopuld have skipped the trial for this one.

There were times he was so corrupt he had to be lead into his own office

Obama obviously stole something and refusing a search

This is another case of harassment

We even sent Spiderman after him

 

[Siete]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

Releasing 5 high ranking terrorists so they can kill more Americans for a traitor to America is very popular with the Dimwinger base.

Personal benefit for Obama.

Next?

swapping prisoners takes place in every war we have taken prisoners, look it f'n up.

NEXT

 

[Crepitus]

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

LOL, so now it's okay to break the law as long as your motive isn't for "personal benefit"?

What do they call this idiotic legal system that exists on the planet you inhabit?

Can't have been that big a deal if it took them years to get around to telling us.

Er..ummm... that's not the point, the point of my post was to prompt you to justify your implication that breaking the law is okay as long as the motive isn't for "personal benefit".

Do you care to retract that assertion or would you like to keep digging the hole deeper?

That's not anything I said, it's something you made up.

So I have no need to deny it, 'cause I never said it.

ROFLMAO! you realize that your posts in this thread are still readable, right ? You're not just a liar, you're a really, really BAD liar, YOU and DONALD TRUMP have that in common; he likes to deny he said shit that is recorded for everyone to see and hear.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit

Are you going to try and deny that your statement is an attempt to justify President O'Nimrods illegal actions based on motive? Can't wait to hear this fucking fairy tale.....

Ok, go ahead and quote the post where I said that.

And when you can't, admit that you are the one who is lying.

 

[Crepitus]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke the law. No impeachment.
You’re a Humphrey Bogart wannabe, aren’t ya, kid...

Lol, doesn't every guy, on some level, wanna be Humphrey Bogart?

There are no real.similarities between what President Obama did, and what Cheeto Jesus did. False equivalency is just that. False.

 

[NightFox]

LOL, so now it's okay to break the law as long as your motive isn't for "personal benefit"?

What do they call this idiotic legal system that exists on the planet you inhabit?

Can't have been that big a deal if it took them years to get around to telling us.

Er..ummm... that's not the point, the point of my post was to prompt you to justify your implication that breaking the law is okay as long as the motive isn't for "personal benefit".

Do you care to retract that assertion or would you like to keep digging the hole deeper?

That's not anything I said, it's something you made up.

So I have no need to deny it, 'cause I never said it.

ROFLMAO! you realize that your posts in this thread are still readable, right ? You're not just a liar, you're a really, really BAD liar, YOU and DONALD TRUMP have that in common; he likes to deny he said shit that is recorded for everyone to see and hear.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit

Are you going to try and deny that your statement is an attempt to justify President O'Nimrods illegal actions based on motive? Can't wait to hear this fucking fairy tale.....

Ok, go ahead and quote the post where I said that.

And when you can't, admit that you are the one who is lying.

I already did TWICE , learn how to read ya fucking retard.

 

[Nostra]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

Releasing 5 high ranking terrorists so they can kill more Americans for a traitor to America is very popular with the Dimwinger base.

Personal benefit for Obama.

Next?

swapping prisoners takes place in every war we have taken prisoners, look it f'n up.

NEXT

Bergdahl was a deserter, Fuckwit.

 

[BlindBoo]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

He broke the law. No impeachment.
You’re a Humphrey Bogart wannabe, aren’t ya, kid...

Lol, doesn't every guy, on some level, wanna be Humphrey Bogart?

There are no real.similarities between what President Obama did, and what Cheeto Jesus did. False equivalency is just that. False.

Humphrey Trumphrey and his balls.

 

[Siete]

"
That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees," the GAO explained.



The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. "DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law," the GAO said.


At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a "sacred rule" not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

"We saw an opportunity," Mr. Obama said on June 3. "We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity."

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law."

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

All Progs are hypocrites.

Personal benefit. That's the difference kid. President Obama did not do it for personal benefit.

Releasing 5 high ranking terrorists so they can kill more Americans for a traitor to America is very popular with the Dimwinger base.

Personal benefit for Obama.

Next?

swapping prisoners takes place in every war we have taken prisoners, look it f'n up.

NEXT

Bergdahl was a deserter, Fuckwit.

he was an American -

hell, I'd even trade your traitor ass if the ragheads had you.

 

[JustAGuy1]

How about when the GAO found that Obama violated section 503 of the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, and the Antideficiency Act by over-spending on secret service by $5,100,000 (five-million one-hundred thousand dollars) in 2009, and diverting those funds from another agency. Is that personal enough for you?

So? Republicans controlled both houses of Congress. Look, you don't get to keep posting bullshit about what Obama did unless it's the exact same thing as what trump did. So you go find a credible source that shows that in 2008 and 2012, Obama sought help from foreign countries to win elections, then we can talk.

You really think you can control the flow of the Conversation Boy? You are severely overestimating your influence.
Fact, Obambi did it.