So, when Obama says climate change is a fact.....

[Antares]

So, when Obama says climate change is a fact.....

.......... it means he listens to the best minds on the planet.

He hasn't even listened to the best minds in his own administration.

He thinks HE is the smartest person in the country.

 

[daws101]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?
so in the million or so years that hominids and then humans have controlled fire there is no measurable effect ?
what about the industrial revolution?
population growth
mass transit, cars and other gas or oil powered vehicles
atomic testing?
pollution?
it's your contention that none of the above listed activities or things is even partiality responsible?

 

[Antares]

Anthrpogenic Climate Change is bullshit.

 

[westwall]

So, when Obama says climate change is a fact.....

.......... it means he listens to the best minds on the planet.

Who seem unable to do simple math. Amazing.

 

[daws101]

Anthrpogenic Climate Change is bullshit.

doyou have objective evidence of this or are you talking out your ass because you like the smell?

 

[daws101]

So, when Obama says climate change is a fact.....

.......... it means he listens to the best minds on the planet.

Who seem unable to do simple math. Amazing.

therein lies the problem the math is not simple.

 

[Stephanie]

the best minds on the planet

the majority of them are FOREIGNERS now tell us they don't have an AGENDA in this

it's called, MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY

 

[westwall]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?
so in the million or so years that hominids and then humans have controlled fire there is no measurable effect ?
what about the industrial revolution?
population growth
mass transit, cars and other gas or oil powered vehicles
atomic testing?
pollution?
it's your contention that none of the above listed activities or things is even partiality responsible?

Where man is concentrated in the cities there is indeed a Urban Heat Island Effect. But other than that...no.

 

[blackhawk]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?
so in the million or so years that hominids and then humans have controlled fire there is no measurable effect ?
what about the industrial revolution?
population growth
mass transit, cars and other gas or oil powered vehicles
atomic testing?
pollution?
it's your contention that none of the above listed activities or things is even partiality responsible?

No were saying it's not the disaster and dire situation that Al Gore and other alarmist try and make out to be.

 

[westwall]

.......... it means he listens to the best minds on the planet.

Who seem unable to do simple math. Amazing.

therein lies the problem the math is not simple.

Most of it is....and they can't even handle that.

 

[Stephanie]

Here's the "best mind on the PLANET"

Al Gore told the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland this week that Africa’s population is a problem that must be addressed.
The Right Scoop Reported:


“Africa’s projected to have more people than China or India by mid-century. More than China and India combined by the end of the century. And this is one of the causal factors that must be addressed.”



Africa is less densely populated than Europe where Gore was lecturing.

all of it here

Racist Al Gore Tells World Economic Forum: Africa?s Population Is a Problem That Must Be Addressed (Video) | The Gateway Pundit
__________________


http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...-be-wrong-hypocritical-about.html#post8534884

 

[BlackSand]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?

I think your question is all screwed up ... Too many negatives.
If you want someone to deny something didn't happen ... Then that would be you in the fact that you are saying it did ... Ask yourself.

.

 

[daws101]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?
so in the million or so years that hominids and then humans have controlled fire there is no measurable effect ?
what about the industrial revolution?
population growth
mass transit, cars and other gas or oil powered vehicles
atomic testing?
pollution?
it's your contention that none of the above listed activities or things is even partiality responsible?

Where man is concentrated in the cities there is indeed a Urban Heat Island Effect. But other than that...no.

that's a half truth...

 

[daws101]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?
so in the million or so years that hominids and then humans have controlled fire there is no measurable effect ?
what about the industrial revolution?
population growth
mass transit, cars and other gas or oil powered vehicles
atomic testing?
pollution?
it's your contention that none of the above listed activities or things is even partiality responsible?

No were saying it's not the disaster and dire situation that Al Gore and other alarmist try and make out to be.

so we should wait till it out of our control or let god take care of it?

 

[Antares]

Anthrpogenic Climate Change is bullshit.

doyou have objective evidence of this or are you talking out your ass because you like the smell?

Too funny.

The very people that have foisted this clap trap upon the world have been proven again and again to be fudging the very "proof" you CHOOSE to believe.

From the UN, to East Anglia University ( which you have no knowledge of) because you just swallow everything Gore throws at you.

Al Gore has one of the largest "carbon footprints" in the World but you don't care

Take your "consensus" and shove it, that is patently stupid.

 

[daws101]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?

I think your question is all screwed up ... Too many negatives.
If you want someone to deny something didn't happen ... Then that would be you in the fact that you are saying it did ... Ask yourself.

.

well you're wrong, my point was denial and most all of the answering posts are proving my point about it...

 

[daws101]

Anthrpogenic Climate Change is bullshit.

doyou have objective evidence of this or are you talking out your ass because you like the smell?

Too funny.

The very people that have foisted this clap trap upon the world have been proven again and again to be fudging the very "proof" you CHOOSE to believe.

From the UN, to East Anglia University ( which you have no knowledge of) because you just swallow everything Gore throws at you.

Al Gore has one of the largest "carbon footprints" in the World but you don't care

Take your "consensus" and shove it, that is patently stupid.

your denial is criminally stupid .
I'll ask again, should we wait till it's out of our control or let god handle it.?
btw your "answer" must mean you have no objective evidence.

 

[BlackSand]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?

I think your question is all screwed up ... Too many negatives.
If you want someone to deny something didn't happen ... Then that would be you in the fact that you are saying it did ... Ask yourself.

.

well you're wrong, my point was denial and most all of the answering posts are proving my point about it...

To "DENY that man has had NO EFFECT on the climate or environment" ... Would be to ACCEPT man HAS had an effect on the climate or environment.

So where exactly was it I was wrong ... You want to suggest man HAS had NO effect on the climate or environment ... Or DENY it?

.

 

[HelenaHandbag]

let me get this straight... you right wing folks deny that man has had no net effect on climate or the environment in general since we learned to walk up right ?
so in the million or so years that hominids and then humans have controlled fire there is no measurable effect ?
what about the industrial revolution?
population growth
mass transit, cars and other gas or oil powered vehicles
atomic testing?
pollution?
it's your contention that none of the above listed activities or things is even partiality responsible?

Giant straw man argument.

That mankind has had an effect on the environment, it does not automatically follow that the effect is what the doomsayers say that it is.

 

[daws101]

I think your question is all screwed up ... Too many negatives.
If you want someone to deny something didn't happen ... Then that would be you in the fact that you are saying it did ... Ask yourself.

.

well you're wrong, my point was denial and most all of the answering posts are proving my point about it...

To "DENY that man has had NO EFFECT on the climate or environment" ... Would be to ACCEPT man HAS had an effect on the climate or environment.

So where exactly was it I was wrong ... You want to suggest man HAS had NO effect on the climate or environment ... Or DENY it?

.

my first answer stands