Climate change movement isn’t about climate, it hates the West.

1703284809493.png
 
Glaciers don't come and go Skye. They're not seasonal.
A glacier (US: /ˈɡleɪʃər/; UK: /ˈɡlæsiər, ˈɡleɪsiər/) is a persistent body of dense ice that is constantly moving under its own weight. A glacier forms where the accumulation of snow exceeds its ablation over many years, often centuries. It acquires distinguishing features, such as crevasses and seracs, as it slowly flows and deforms under stresses induced by its weight. As it moves, it abrades rock and debris from its substrate to create landforms such as cirques, moraines, or fjords. Although a glacier may flow into a body of water, it forms only on land and is distinct from the much thinner sea ice and lake ice that form on the surface of bodies of water.

 
"Actually, challenging the consensus among the scientific community is nothing new, but those the voices of those challenging the consensus are always drowned out by the tsunami of climate hysteria from the climate alarmists. For example, in 2012 a group of more than 125 scientists sent an open letter to the United Nations warning that scientific evidence refuted UN Secretary-General’s Ban Ki-Moon repeated assertions on weather and climate. Those warnings of climate hysteria unsupported by the scientific evidence were ignored in 2012, just like the letter from the 500 prominent scientists and professionals will be ignored in 2019. In other words, it’s “deja vu all over again.”



 
"Actually, challenging the consensus among the scientific community is nothing new, but those the voices of those challenging the consensus are always drowned out by the tsunami of climate hysteria from the climate alarmists. For example, in 2012 a group of more than 125 scientists sent an open letter to the United Nations warning that scientific evidence refuted UN Secretary-General’s Ban Ki-Moon repeated assertions on weather and climate. Those warnings of climate hysteria unsupported by the scientific evidence were ignored in 2012, just like the letter from the 500 prominent scientists and professionals will be ignored in 2019. In other words, it’s “deja vu all over again.”



Very, very few of those 500 people are actually climate experts. The number of publishing climate scientists in the world is over 10,000 and they are almost unanimously in agreeement with the conclusions of the IPCC because the conclusions of the IPCC are based on an assessment of their work.
 
Very, very few of those 500 people are actually climate experts. The number of publishing climate scientists in the world is over 10,000 and they are almost unanimously in agreeement with the conclusions of the IPCC because the conclusions of the IPCC are based on an assessment of their work.
That's what they are paid to do. Blame natural climate events on man.
 
The IPCC and people who fund the IPCC and similar groups. I'd like to know who is paying for the annual COP's?
The IPCC funds ZERO research. Go look for yourself. And CoPs are paid for by the parties (Conference Of the Parties, get it?) with a good chunk thrown in by whoever offers to host the things.
 
And how do their employers do that? Bonuses? Slipping it under the table? Meet me a the park bench? What's the proper IRS form to declare payoffs?
Why does that matter? The only thing that matters is whether there is a crisis or not. No crisis, no need for the jobs that predict the crisis.
 
The IPCC funds ZERO research. Go look for yourself. And CoPs are paid for by the parties (Conference Of the Parties, get it?) with a good chunk thrown in by whoever offers to host the things.
How much "research" do you think is done at these Bon Jovi fueled cocktail-fests in Cancun, Copenhagen, Paris, and Dubai?
 
The truth is the nan made climate change movement isnt about saving the planet, it is about destroying Western Civilization……


What is the connection between these two seemingly unrelated topics, global warming and the conflict between Israel and Hamas? One might say that a person who is wrong about one thing (global warming) is likely to be wrong about another (Gaza). But Thunberg isn’t just wrong, she is a passionate advocate against fossil fuels and against Israel–and, more broadly, “settler colonialism.”

That is not a coincidence. Rather, it reflects the fact that the climate change movement in which Thunberg is so prominent actually has little or nothing to do with climate change. Rather, it is an attack on the West. Fossil fuels are the foundation of modern civilization. They are the sole reason why we are not riding around in donkey carts and reading by candle light. Destroying fossil fuels means, at best, impoverishing the West.

That this is the activists’ real goal is evident from the fact that they train their fire not on China or India, but on the United States and Europe. If they were really concerned about the climate, this would make no sense, because China is by far the largest emitter of CO2. Robert Bryce produced this graph just a few days ago:
—————-
If you aren’t talking about Chinese emissions, everything you are saying about global warming is a joke. And neither Greta Thunberg nor Al Gore, Joe Biden or John Kerry is saying anything about Chinese emissions. If they really believed their own hype about global warming as an existential threat, they would be talking about invading China or bombing the hundreds of new coal plants that it has under development. But they don’t do that; instead, they stick up for the Chinese Communists and say they are doing a pretty good job. So their real goal isn’t affecting the climate, it is destroying Western economies and, thus, Western power.

Your timeline is off. Greta was a climate activist long before the war in Gaza
 

Forum List

Back
Top