Retail workers fear for their safety

What 2 stores.
This entire shitcon narrative is bullshit, like most shitcon narratives.

Chains came into areas and drove out smaller/local businesses.

They were too aggressive for their own capitalist good in some instances, and now, with no loyalty to anything but their bottom line, are closing stores, sometimes in underserved areas.

In order to avoid the wrath of the locals for their destructive predatory corporatism - and also internal accountability for errors in projected profit - they're using crime in some instances as a catch-all excuse.

WaPo explains:


From the article:

Walmart told Bloomberg News that crime and theft weren’t leading drivers of its decision.

But shitcons here (and everywhere) want to be triggered, want things to be falling apart, want to blame minorities and the so-called "woke," so they embrace these infantile narratives despite mountains of evidence which refute their never-ending narcissistic outrage.

:dunno:
 
Per the linked article: workers are afraid, according to a new report from Motorola Solutions.

It appears obvious to me that the intent of the findings, based on its source, is for businesses to buy Motorola Solutions equipment for their employees.
 
4 in SF, post the links.
Here you go. There is more. This article sites 17 stores that have left downtown SF since 2020 due to employee and customer safety in shoplifting incidents.


Businesses don’t want to be in areas where they are going to get looted and flash mobbed. You don’t think it’s a big deal because you don’t have any business or investment in a business that is located in an area that attracts flash mobs.

Why is this so hard for you to understand business risk?
 
The OP.

He's VERY unhappy that things are looking up.

Go figure. :dunno:

See above.
No, he is upset at the crime and its effect on retail workers, but your reading comprehension sucks, so I understand your need to lie .
 
Here you go. There is more. This article sites 17 stores that have left downtown SF since 2020 due to employee and customer safety in shoplifting incidents.


Businesses don’t want to be in areas where they are going to get looted and flash mobbed. You don’t think it’s a big deal because you don’t have any business or investment in a business that is located in an area that attracts flash mobs.

Why is this so hard for you to understand business risk?
Still in SF, that doesn't cover the US as a whole.
 
This entire shitcon narrative is bullshit, like most shitcon narratives.

Chains came into areas and drove out smaller/local businesses.

They were too aggressive for their own capitalist good in some instances, and now, with no loyalty to anything but their bottom line, are closing stores, sometimes in underserved areas.

In order to avoid the wrath of the locals for their destructive predatory corporatism - and also internal accountability for errors in projected profit - they're using crime in some instances as a catch-all excuse.

WaPo explains:


From the article:

Walmart told Bloomberg News that crime and theft weren’t leading drivers of its decision.

But shitcons here (and everywhere) want to be triggered, want things to be falling apart, want to blame minorities and the so-called "woke," so they embrace these infantile narratives despite mountains of evidence which refute their never-ending narcissistic outrage.

:dunno:
Washington Post deal in mostly conspiracy theories
 
Still in SF, that doesn't cover the US as a whole.
Here are some more data points for you; more stores, wider distribution across the US. Not sure just how many data points you need but the business risk managers within these organizations have obviously seen enough.

 

Forum List

Back
Top