- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,073
- 47,240
- 2,180
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! The bitch who says Trump is not fit to serve proves she's not fit to serve. How much do you want to bet that she continues to call for Trump's impeachment?
WASHINGTON, August 28, 2017 – With the crisis in Texas, and the Presidential pardon of Joe Arpaio, you might have missed that the House ethics committee has charged Rep. Maxine Waters with three counts of violating House rules and the federal ethics code in connection with her effort to arrange a 2008 meeting between Treasury officials and representatives of OneUnited bank.
A quick check of Google News showed that none of the main stream liberal media reported on the fact that the committee charged the ten-term California Democrat with three counts of violating House rules and the federal ethics code in connection with her effort to arrange a 2008 meeting between Treasury officials and representatives with OneUnited bank.
Waters, who sits on the Financial Services Committee, broke a House rule requiring members to behave in a way that reflects “creditably” on the chamber. The committee noted that by trying to assist OneUnited, Waters would benefit from the bailout because her husband owns OneUnited stock, estimated at $350,000. At the end of September 2008, the stock, which represented up to 15.2 percent of the couples net worth, had fallen to $175,000. The committee found that “if OneUnited failed, [Waters’s] husband’s investment would have been worthless.”
A quick check of Google News showed that none of the main stream liberal media reported on the fact that the committee charged the ten-term California Democrat with three counts of violating House rules and the federal ethics code in connection with her effort to arrange a 2008 meeting between Treasury officials and representatives with OneUnited bank.
Waters, who sits on the Financial Services Committee, broke a House rule requiring members to behave in a way that reflects “creditably” on the chamber. The committee noted that by trying to assist OneUnited, Waters would benefit from the bailout because her husband owns OneUnited stock, estimated at $350,000. At the end of September 2008, the stock, which represented up to 15.2 percent of the couples net worth, had fallen to $175,000. The committee found that “if OneUnited failed, [Waters’s] husband’s investment would have been worthless.”