Jan. 6th, The Law, and Nancy Pelosi's Dereliction of Duty

[Faun]

§28a. Compilation of the Precedents of House of Representatives; date of completion; biennial update; printing and availability of copies​

The Speaker is authorized and directed to complete the Compilation of the Precedents of the House of Representatives by January 1, 1977, and prepare an updated compilation of such precedents every two years thereafter. Copies of the Compilation of Precedents shall be printed in sufficient quantity to be available to every Member and the standing committees of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777.)

So show a House Speaker prior to Nancy Pelosi whole has the DCNG deployed....

 

[elektra]

So show a House Speaker prior to Nancy Pelosi whole has the DCNG deployed....

Okay

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-DESCHLERS-V1/pdf/GPO-HPREC-DESCHLERS-V1.pdf

The deployment of troops was in accordance with the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol, which had been previously approved by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States. Specific authority was neither requested by nor received from the Speaker or other Capitol officials prior to the assignment of troops to guard the Capitol. On Feb. 25, 1943, (4) Speaker Sam Rayburn, of Texas, from the floor of the House, defended his policy of having the Capitol protected by federal soldiers for a time during World War II:

 

[Faun]

Okay

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-DESCHLERS-V1/pdf/GPO-HPREC-DESCHLERS-V1.pdf

The deployment of troops was in accordance with the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol, which had been previously approved by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States. Specific authority was neither requested by nor received from the Speaker or other Capitol officials prior to the assignment of troops to guard the Capitol. On Feb. 25, 1943, (4) Speaker Sam Rayburn, of Texas, from the floor of the House, defended his policy of having the Capitol protected by federal soldiers for a time during World War II:

So LBJ called them up, not the Speaker.

Specific authority was neither requested by nor received from the Speaker

Good job at failing again.

 

[elektra]

So LBJ called them up, not the Speaker.
Specific authority was neither requested by nor received from the Speaker Good job at failing again.

Like I said, you lack critical comprehension skills, although you do understand that you must cherry pick. Troops deployed in accordance with the Emergency Plan... Approved by the Speaker of the House, and the President of the Senate.

deployment of troops was in accordance with the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol, which had been previously approved by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States

 

[elektra]

So LBJ called them up, not the Speaker.
Specific authority was neither requested by nor received from the Speaker

I have never denied that the Executive Branch deploys (they are not called up) Federal Troops. It is the authorization to be deployed outside the Executive Branch's Jurisdiction into the Legislative Branch that must be the policy of the Speaker of the House. You choose to cherry pick one sentence out of my post while ignoring the context.

Speaker of the House, POLICY, to authorize deployment of Federal Troops on the Capitol Building grounds.

On Feb. 25, 1943, (4) Speaker Sam Rayburn, of Texas, from the floor of the House, defended his policy of having the Capitol protected by federal soldiers for a time during World War II

 

[beagle9]

I have never denied that the Executive Branch deploys (they are not called up) Federal Troops. It is the authorization to be deployed outside the Executive Branch's Jurisdiction into the Legislative Branch that must be the policy of the Speaker of the House. You choose to cherry pick one sentence out of my post while ignoring the context.

Speaker of the House, POLICY, to authorize deployment of Federal Troops on the Capitol Building grounds.

On Feb. 25, 1943, (4) Speaker Sam Rayburn, of Texas, from the floor of the House, defended his policy of having the Capitol protected by federal soldiers for a time during World War II

They'll keep cherry picking until the cows come home. They got nothing else.

 

[elektra]

They'll keep cherry picking until the cows come home. They got nothing else.

I hope they do, maybe replying will beat into their think skulls the truth.

 

[Faun]

Like I said, you lack critical comprehension skills, although you do understand that you must cherry pick. Troops deployed in accordance with the Emergency Plan... Approved by the Speaker of the House, and the President of the Senate.

deployment of troops was in accordance with the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol, which had been previously approved by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States

That could be acknowledging the president, as commander of the DCNG, has full authority to deploy the DCNG to the Capitol without the CPB requesting it. Again, you've never seen the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol. You don't know what's in it.

 

[Faun]

I have never denied that the Executive Branch deploys (they are not called up) Federal Troops. It is the authorization to be deployed outside the Executive Branch's Jurisdiction into the Legislative Branch that must be the policy of the Speaker of the House. You choose to cherry pick one sentence out of my post while ignoring the context.

Speaker of the House, POLICY, to authorize deployment of Federal Troops on the Capitol Building grounds.

On Feb. 25, 1943, (4) Speaker Sam Rayburn, of Texas, from the floor of the House, defended his policy of having the Capitol protected by federal soldiers for a time during World War II

You claim that "must be the policy" when you've never seen the policy.

 

[elektra]

Okay

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-DESCHLERS-V1/pdf/GPO-HPREC-DESCHLERS-V1.pdf

The deployment of troops was in accordance with the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol, which had been previously approved by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States. Specific authority was neither requested by nor received from the Speaker or other Capitol officials prior to the assignment of troops to guard the Capitol. On Feb. 25, 1943, (4) Speaker Sam Rayburn, of Texas, from the floor of the House, defended his policy of having the Capitol protected by federal soldiers for a time during World War II:

So LBJ called them up, not the Speaker.
Good job at failing again.

?????? Why or how do you think the Navy Reserve has authority over the National Guard? I assume you do know that LBJ was in the Navy Reserve in 1943.

faun, you keep denying facts that I quote and post from the .gov websites well proving you have no idea what you are talking about. In 1943 Roosevelt was president, not Lyndon B. Johnson.

 

[Faun]

?????? Why or how do you think the Navy Reserve has authority over the National Guard? I assume you do know that LBJ was in the Navy Reserve in 1943.

faun, you keep denying facts that I quote and post from the .gov websites well proving you have no idea what you are talking about. In 1943 Roosevelt was president, not Lyndon B. Johnson.

You really don't know what the fuck you're yammering about. LBJ was president in 1968. It even says so. The part about WWII was in the paragraph after these... emphasis mine to highlight your ignorance...

§ 1.2 Federal troops have been called upon to guard the Capitol and its facilities on several extraordinary occasions.

On Apr. 5, 1968, in response to the widespread civil disorder that arose in the District of Columbia following the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King in Memphis, Tennessee, the preceding day, President Lyndon B. Johnson issued an executive order (3) authorizing the Secretary of Defense to mobilize National Guard Troops and to order regular armed forces into the District of Columbia to restore law and order, protect government property and prevent interference with governmental activities. The Capitol was one of the first areas secured when the troops arrived on Friday, Apr. 5. Troops remained on duty at the Capitol until Friday, Apr. 12, when they were withdrawn on order of the Secretary of Defense.

The deployment of troops was in accordance with the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol, which had been previously approved by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States. Specific authority was neither requested by nor received from the Speaker or other Capitol officials prior to the assignment of troops to guard the Capitol.​

 

[elektra]

You really don't know what the fuck you're yammering about. LBJ was president in 1968. It even says so. The part about WWII was in the paragraph after these... emphasis mine to highlight your ignorance...

§ 1.2 Federal troops have been called upon to guard the Capitol and its facilities on several extraordinary occasions.​

​

On Apr. 5, 1968, in response to the widespread civil disorder that arose in the District of Columbia following the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King in Memphis, Tennessee, the preceding day, President Lyndon B. Johnson issued an executive order (3) authorizing the Secretary of Defense to mobilize National Guard Troops and to order regular armed forces into the District of Columbia to restore law and order, protect government property and prevent interference with governmental activities. The Capitol was one of the first areas secured when the troops arrived on Friday, Apr. 5. Troops remained on duty at the Capitol until Friday, Apr. 12, when they were withdrawn on order of the Secretary of Defense. ​

​

The deployment of troops was in accordance with the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol, which had been previously approved by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States. Specific authority was neither requested by nor received from the Speaker or other Capitol officials prior to the assignment of troops to guard the Capitol.​

I am sorry you are terribly confused. This is what happens when you cherry pick comments without quoting the entire comment.

The comment you cherry picked from contained no reference to 1968.

Now that you are actually using the sources i gave you, you can see that you are wrong and that you must cherry pick to decieve yourself and everyone else.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Suffice to say, Pelosi's et. al. sphincters will be twitching if Trump wins.

 

[elektra]

You really don't know what the fuck you're yammering about. LBJ was president in 1968. It even says so. The part about WWII was in the paragraph after these... emphasis mine to highlight your ignorance...

§ 1.2 Federal troops have been called upon to guard the Capitol and its facilities on several extraordinary occasions.​

​

The deployment of troops was in accordance with the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol, which had been previously approved by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States​

Approved by the Speaker through the Emegency plan, thank you again. Precedents set, Pelose was Derelict of Duty.

 

[Faun]

I am sorry you are terribly confused. This is what happens when you cherry pick comments without quoting the entire comment.

The comment you cherry picked from contained no reference to 1968.

Now that you are actually using the sources i gave you, you can see that you are wrong and that you must cherry pick to decieve yourself and everyone else.

Who knows how you think you can win a debate when you're as demented as you are. In post #1322, you posted these two paragraphs (highlighted in red)...

​

​

​

​

... only that first paragraph highlighted is a continuation from the preceding paragraph about 1968. It has nothing to do with the following paragraph about 1943.

 

[elektra]

... only that first paragraph highlighted is a continuation from the preceding paragraph about 1968. It has nothing to do with the following paragraph about 1943.

I can admit to making a mistake, and I am not in a debate, at least not with you, or anyone here. I posted fact, and now you see that is the Speaker that authorized troops in 1943 and 1968.

Do you have anything that proves that wrong, after you just showed everybody that you can quote the precedents.

 

[Faun]

I can admit to making a mistake, and I am not in a debate, at least not with you, or anyone here. I posted fact, and now you see that is the Speaker that authorized troops in 1943 and 1968.

Do you have anything that proves that wrong, after you just showed everybody that you can quote the precedents.

You have not shown speaker authorization.

1943 sounds contested.

And you have no idea what was is the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol. What is it? You don't know. What's in it? You don't know. Was it a real thing? You don't know.

Here, watch this...

Post a link that describes the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol...

 

[beagle9]

You have not shown speaker authorization.

1943 sounds contested.

And you have no idea what was is the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol. What is it? You don't know. What's in it? You don't know. Was it a real thing? You don't know.

Here, watch this...

Post a link that describes the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol...

Regardless of the back and forth here, there are only two elements to focus on.

1. Trump was the leader of the Americans who had finally had enough of the Democrat coup that was started when Trump came down that escalator in his first term.

2. Did the Democrat's along with the FBI as are being accused, sabotage the event or the protest by planting disruptors whose job it was to stir the crowd into great anger in which ultimately led to the breach ???

Trump had nothing to do with the violent uprising in the crowd, otherwise he spoke to the citizen's too then go forth and make their voices "peacefully" heard on that day. What the crowd was possibly instigated to do by possibly implanted agitators or rabble rowsers had nothing to do with Trump protesting the shady results of an alleged stolen election along with the peace loving Americans at his side.

 

[Faun]

Regardless of the back and forth here, there are only two elements to focus on.

1. Trump was the leader of the Americans who had finally had enough of the Democrat coup that was started when Trump came down that escalator in his first term.

2. Did the Democrat's along with the FBI as are being accused, sabotage the event or the protest by planting disruptors whose job it was to stir the crowd into great anger in which ultimately led to the breach ???

Trump had nothing to do with the violent uprising in the crowd, otherwise he spoke to the citizen's too then go forth and make their voices "peacefully" heard on that day. What the crowd was possibly instigated to do by possibly implanted agitators or rabble rowsers had nothing to do with Trump protesting the shady results of an alleged stolen election along with the peace loving Americans at his side.

Exactly how we're they supposed to make their voices heard without going inside the Capitol? Who was going to hear them from outside?

 

[elektra]

You have not shown speaker authorization.

1943 sounds contested.

And you have no idea what was is the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol. What is it? You don't know. What's in it? You don't know. Was it a real thing? You don't know.

Here, watch this...

Post a link that describes the Emergency Plan for Protection of the Capitol...

The House Practice dictates precedent is followed

There are at least two precedents establishing the fact that it is the Speaker of the House was has authority.

The Emergency plan is in the law. The law states Federal Troops are deployed by the authority of this law approved by the Speaker.

The Emergency Plan you had no idea existed until I proved the Emergency Plan existed.

I also stated to you the Emergency Plan is classified, not posted online.

Faun, you ignorant poorly thought out idea that you can claim to prove the facts are wrong by created a stupid premise, is just that. Stupid.

Try again