Remember when the Tea PArty did this?

[Quantum Windbag]

How quickly the partisan hacks forget.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmP4Gb2pEsY

LOL

You think I am a partisan hack? Then you post a video of a guy yelling in the midst of an orderly demonstration, and the Senator getting spittle on him because he chose to walk along the edge of the cleared path instead of in the middle of it.

Actually the title states that they were "chased and trapped by the hecklers" and yet no one was trapped. Yes they were followed but the same can be said of those in the clip I provided. The clip i provided also shows hecklers. so what was your point again?

Funny how you attempt to make excuses for your clip and the tea partiers in mine and yet have to ask if I think you are a partisan hack? You pretty much admit that you are with your partisan excuses. As for where he chose to walk he was escorted on left and walked toward the stairs behind where those ahead of him walked and the protester standing at the bottom of said stairs and nest to the hand rail screamed in his face. Where did you expect him to walk?

Furthermore, spittle still counts as spit so could you tell dive that it is now confirmed.

spit·tle (sptl)
n.
1. Spit; saliva.

spit 1 (spt)
n.
1. Saliva, especially when expectorated; spittle.

LOL

Tell him that what is confirmed? I think he already knows you are a partisan hack,

You go out of your way to find snips of videos that make the Tea Party look bad, and I link to a video that shows that, despite an element in the crowd that is willing to chase a representative across the room and harass him, and all you can see is the title. Believe it or not, I could have downloaded that video, trimmed it to leave only the bad parts, and left you and yours defenseless unless you actually found the source of the original video.

As a matter of fact, so could the partisan hack that actually posted it on his blog.

The interesting here is that, instead of seeing that the side you are complaining about is actually presenting all the facts for you to draw your own conclusion, you are upset because you do not like the title of the piece on his blog.

Like I asked in my first response to you in this thread, project much? Are you so used to your side using dirty tricks that you are incapable of admitting that the other side did not resort to those same tactics?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Video at the link.

Wisconsin GOP Senator Glenn Grothman chased, trapped by hecklers, saved by Dem. Rep. Hulsey | Dane101

Come to think of it, neither do I, but I do remember the media talking about it a lot. Is there anyone who still wants to argue that there is not a double standard in the media? Just imagine if this was a Democratic governor trying to raise taxes, and the Tea Party actually acted like this.

Senator Glenn Grothman has even bigger worries than being chased and trapped by a bunch of hecklers - according to Recall Senate Republicans Now | Scott Walker Watch Grothman (20th Senate District) now faces 20,000 signatures demanding his recall!

let us know when they actually get the 20,000 sigs

Don't you mean 20,000 valid signatures? They are probably passing the partition around the bars in Illinois where the fleebaggers are hiding out.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Actually it's different becuase the facts are not what the OP claims. He was not trapped. they did follow him but IF you actually watch the video a "heckler" carrying an amplifier and a mic gave the mic to the rep and the "hecklers" for the most part, got quiet and let him speak. Furthermore, based on the video it appears that they didn't know how to get in because all of the doors were locked. I wonder whose bright idea that was??

They stood at the door waiting for someone to open it and when no one came they left and were not prevetned from leaving. They were NOT trapped.

Project much?

I wrote the OP, and the only fact I claimed was that there is bias in the media. Here is the OP to prove my point.

Video at the link.

Wisconsin GOP Senator Glenn Grothman chased, trapped by hecklers, saved by Dem. Rep. Hulsey | Dane101

Come to think of it, neither do I, but I do remember the media talking about it a lot. Is there anyone who still wants to argue that there is not a double standard in the media? Just imagine if this was a Democratic governor trying to raise taxes, and the Tea Party actually acted like this.

Want to try again?

The title of your clip is "wisconsin gop senator glenn grothman chased, trapped by hecklers" and the title of your thread runs with that as you ask "remember when the tea party did this?" and then try to claim that they hadn't chased or trapped anyone based on a clip that shows a GROUP of reps being followed as they were going to a door that they couldn't enter through becuase it was locked and then they left freely and unobstructed so they were NOT trapped.

The core of your OP is based on the title of the clip and the words "chased" instead of the less threatening followed and "trapped" when no one was trapped. Or did you forget what you were basing your argument on??

It is not my clip. I had nothing to do with titling it, I just posted a link.

 

[DiveCon]

What is pathetic is you inserting race into the discussion when I never said anything about it. You assumed and ran with it. LOL

Furthermore, what does anything that you said in this new line of bs have to do with me??

What does what the spitter was chanting have to do with anything?? There were a lot of people yelling so do you expect that the congressman heard only the spitter and walked into his spit intentionally?? What is your point?? Do you have one??

So he came back out and looked for him, what is your point??

LOL and you claim i am pathetic? LOL

except he didnt dipshit
he said there were claims of RACISM

Actually moron he did.

lol....that is the best they got.

As hard as they tried..with all of the ralleys...the closest they got to racism was an accusation but no recording of it (despite hundreds of cameras and recorders there)....and a man claiming he was spit on when it is quite obvious that the "spitter" was screaming and not actually spitting...and everyone knows that saliva forms in your mouth and sometimes inadvertanly shoots out of it when you are enthusiastic about something.

Yep...thats the best they got.

He tried to claim that I posted that link based on claims of racism when I never mentioned race. He is the one that brought it up.

Thanks for the spin but your dishonesty is poking out. you better have that looked at. LOL

you lying sack of shit
he did no such thing there

 

[DiveCon]

Senator Glenn Grothman has even bigger worries than being chased and trapped by a bunch of hecklers - according to Recall Senate Republicans Now | Scott Walker Watch Grothman (20th Senate District) now faces 20,000 signatures demanding his recall!

let us know when they actually get the 20,000 sigs

Don't you mean 20,000 valid signatures? They are probably passing the partition around the bars in Illinois where the fleebaggers are hiding out.

yes, valid

 

[Meister]

And they were ordered to do that.

And look at this ...

.

The Tea Party Nations is cool with putting plants in the crowd dressed up as SEIU members ...



And let's not forget this ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNzhZf1mYZQ

You forgot the first part of the Video clip where she attacked Rand... I won't bother to read the rest of your post as you're already either vastly uneducated on what you're talking about or purposely lying by misrepresenting what happened.

Of course I'm not saying the "Head stomp" that was widly (even by Rand) condemed was ok. But you seem more than ok with her actions.

Ah the typical troll of the right. They claim you are wrong as they ignore the content of your posts because they claim it's either uneducated or wrong but refuse to show how it is either so they can avoid content that they don't want to address.

BTW, in the first part of your video the "attacker" was carried off behind paul's vehicle and yet in the first video she was in front of the vehicle and was no where near enough to paul to be considered a threat so why claim that she "attacked" him is a valid excuse for what the rand paul supporters did to her??

She tried to give him a sign and was shoved away and was attacked LATER after paul exited the cehicle and walked away but paul's supporters grabbed her, pushed her top the ground and stomped on her.

If you want misrepresenting what happened and lying you need only look at your own post as you try to claim she attacked rand paul as a justification for how she was treated by his supporters. You claim that you are not saying her being stomped was "ok" but you sure are trying to defend their actions.

You are a delusional liar, smitty. She wasn't trying to give anyone the sign, she shoved it through the window. You and honesty have never crossed paths. There is some honesty for you.

 

[jeffrockit]

I remember the tea party did worse...they interrupted town hall meetings and didn't allow their fellow citizens the right to interact with their elected representatives.

This was nothing.

I guess these were nothing also:

NINE VIOLENT PROTESTERS Arrested in Madison, Wisconsin | The Gateway Pundit

Wisconsin Protesters Prove Violent Rhetoric Crosses Party Lines at Deceiver.com

Unionists Attack Tea Party Counter Protesters (Video); UPDATE: Linked By Atlas Shrugs

Video: Mob of Angry Protesters Corners Wisconsin GOP Senator | The Blaze

WI protesters get violent - Google Search

Nothing to see here

 

[jeffrockit]

Yes...you did.

You did NOT see it on Hannity, Oreilly, Fox and Friends or Greta. Those are not news shows...they are commentary shows.

Most people who dont watch fox news do not understand the difference.

Fox News reports the news. Commentary shows make it clear they are commentary shows....much like Rachel Maddow does.....

But Fox News gets the bad rap becuase people just dont know or care NOT to know the difference.

The commentary shows are what define FOXNews.

That is what you allow it to define Fox News....

FoxNews name is derived from the fact that that their news programs provide news reports and their commentary programs comment on and discuss news events of choice...

But Hannity is not called "Hannity News...
Oreilly is not called Orielly News and Greta is not called Greta News...and Fox and friends is a morning show.

Those such as me? I watch fox news shows such as thew Brett Bair Evening news.....I do not watch Hannity just as I have no interest in watching Maddow....

But I for one do not define FoxNews based on their commentary shows. That would be like defining CNN based on Larry King (former)...or Wolf Blitzers shows...which are commentary talk shows.

Libs have never been able to understand the difference. The other thing is the constant comparison with the child like mantra of "but they did it too"

 

[American Horse]

The commentary shows are what define FOXNews.

That is what you allow it to define Fox News....

FoxNews name is derived from the fact that that their news programs provide news reports and their commentary programs comment on and discuss news events of choice...

But Hannity is not called "Hannity News...
Oreilly is not called Orielly News and Greta is not called Greta News...and Fox and friends is a morning show.

Those such as me? I watch fox news shows such as thew Brett Bair Evening news.....I do not watch Hannity just as I have no interest in watching Maddow....

But I for one do not define FoxNews based on their commentary shows. That would be like defining CNN based on Larry King (former)...or Wolf Blitzers shows...which are commentary talk shows.

Libs have never been able to understand the difference. The other thing is the constant comparison with the child like mantra of "but they did it too"

And that comparison fails about 40 to 20 which is the make-up of the population of conservatives to liberals - conservative leaning people know that is a dodge; to conservatives personal responsiblity is a strong component of their philosophy. liberals accept that juvenile argument for bad behavior, snce radical change is the strongest component of their philosophy and the opposite, personal responsibility, implies just that; that we don't all walk off a cliff because others do it.

 

[drsmith1072]

Project much?

I wrote the OP, and the only fact I claimed was that there is bias in the media. Here is the OP to prove my point.



Want to try again?

I'm just an outside observer and dont get into the USMB pissing matches but, it says he was "trapped" right there in the title. Maybe you're not saying he was trapped but the article you posted does

That is a point, but I did not write the link.

No you didin't write the title but you posted the link and then agreed with it when you asked, "Remember when the Tea PArty did this?" as you referred to the actions given in the title of your own link.

 

[gekaap]

There is only one standard in the media. The standard of whatever grabs the most attention.

 

[drsmith1072]

you are the fucking moron that never backs his shit up
fuck off moron

And yet in thsi very thread I posted a clip that backs up the argument that I am making in this thread. If you could read instead of trolling about aimlessly you would have realized that. LOL

you are the troll here, dipshit
i'm just calling you out on it

And yet you are the troll who can only attack other poster as you neg rep them and make false claims like the one where you claim "you are the fucking moron that never backs his shit up" and yet the link I provided earlier did just that.

Even when proven WRONG you still lack the integrity to admit it. LOL

 

[DiveCon]

And yet in thsi very thread I posted a clip that backs up the argument that I am making in this thread. If you could read instead of trolling about aimlessly you would have realized that. LOL

you are the troll here, dipshit
i'm just calling you out on it

And yet you are the troll who can only attack other poster as you neg rep them and make false claims like the one where you claim "you are the fucking moron that never backs his shit up" and yet the link I provided earlier did just that.

Even when proven WRONG you still lack the integrity to admit it. LOL

except you have NEVER proven me wrong, dipshit

 

[drsmith1072]

You think I am a partisan hack? Then you post a video of a guy yelling in the midst of an orderly demonstration, and the Senator getting spittle on him because he chose to walk along the edge of the cleared path instead of in the middle of it.

Actually the title states that they were "chased and trapped by the hecklers" and yet no one was trapped. Yes they were followed but the same can be said of those in the clip I provided. The clip i provided also shows hecklers. so what was your point again?

Funny how you attempt to make excuses for your clip and the tea partiers in mine and yet have to ask if I think you are a partisan hack? You pretty much admit that you are with your partisan excuses. As for where he chose to walk he was escorted on left and walked toward the stairs behind where those ahead of him walked and the protester standing at the bottom of said stairs and nest to the hand rail screamed in his face. Where did you expect him to walk?

Furthermore, spittle still counts as spit so could you tell dive that it is now confirmed.

spit·tle (sptl)
n.
1. Spit; saliva.

spit 1 (spt)
n.
1. Saliva, especially when expectorated; spittle.

LOL

Tell him that what is confirmed?

Can't you read?? That the congressman was spit on. Isn't your admission that spittle. otherwise known as spit, hit the congressman as a tea party protester heckled a him good enough confirmation for you to share that info with dive??

I think he already knows you are a partisan hack,

and yet he and others are chiming into a thread to thank you for posting hyped up right wing propaganda. LOL Now that is the epitome of a partisan hack.

You go out of your way to find snips of videos that make the Tea Party look bad,

Actually I did a google search and posted the first one I found. That is hardly going out of my way but thanks for your concern. You asked a question and i gave a response. If you didn't want an answer then don't ask questions.

and I link to a video that shows that, despite an element in the crowd that is willing to chase a representative across the room and harass him, and all you can see is the title.

room?? What room? Did you even watch your own clip?? They were outside the capital building that the governor had locked and they couldn't get in. I even admitted in my post that yes they were followed but I guess you missed that?
Furthermore, if that is harrassment then the clip I provided that shows the same thing from a stationary viewpoint when the tea party did exactly what you are attacking the demostrators in Wisconsin for. They followed some of the congressmen as the congress members were getting heckled and yelled at.

Believe it or not, I could have downloaded that video, trimmed it to leave only the bad parts, and left you and yours defenseless unless you actually found the source of the original video.

As a matter of fact, so could the partisan hack that actually posted it on his blog.

How would editing the video left anyone defenseless especially when you consider the question you open the thread with?? All one has to do is google the tea party and you will find answers to the quiestion that you asked. Funny how you don't seem to care for the answer when it is given.

The interesting here is that, instead of seeing that the side you are complaining about is actually presenting all the facts for you to draw your own conclusion, you are upset because you do not like the title of the piece on his blog.

You presented a clip in which the title makes claims not supported in the clip as you ask a question about the tea party and then proceed to spin and make excuses for the tea party in the face of the facts that show the teap party has done similar. How is that considered presenting all of the facts??

What is more interesting is that you present a clip from a "partisan hack's" blog and then ask a question about the tea party but then you all but ignore the response to your question when it is given.

Like I asked in my first response to you in this thread, project much? Are you so used to your side using dirty tricks that you are incapable of admitting that the other side did not resort to those same tactics?

Actually you said nothing of the sort to me in your first response to me.

You think I am a partisan hack? Then you post a video of a guy yelling in the midst of an orderly demonstration, and the Senator getting spittle on him because he chose to walk along the edge of the cleared path instead of in the middle of it.

All you do is make lame excuses for the tea partiers as you condemn the left for similar actions. I would say that exposes you as a partisan hack.

Furthermore, the clip I presented show the congress members being followed and heckled which is all your clip shows so what is it that you think the demonstrators did that the tea party didn't do?? Specifics please.

 

[drsmith1072]

you are the troll here, dipshit
i'm just calling you out on it

And yet you are the troll who can only attack other poster as you neg rep them and make false claims like the one where you claim "you are the fucking moron that never backs his shit up" and yet the link I provided earlier did just that.

Even when proven WRONG you still lack the integrity to admit it. LOL

except you have NEVER proven me wrong, dipshit

The fact that I posted a link that backs up my argument in this very thread counters your LIE that I never back up my arguments. Therefore you have been proven WRONG. LOL

Thanks for playing but as usual you lose.

 

[drsmith1072]

Project much?

I wrote the OP, and the only fact I claimed was that there is bias in the media. Here is the OP to prove my point.



Want to try again?

The title of your clip is "wisconsin gop senator glenn grothman chased, trapped by hecklers" and the title of your thread runs with that as you ask "remember when the tea party did this?" and then try to claim that they hadn't chased or trapped anyone based on a clip that shows a GROUP of reps being followed as they were going to a door that they couldn't enter through becuase it was locked and then they left freely and unobstructed so they were NOT trapped.

The core of your OP is based on the title of the clip and the words "chased" instead of the less threatening followed and "trapped" when no one was trapped. Or did you forget what you were basing your argument on??

It is not my clip. I had nothing to do with titling it, I just posted a link.

So what was the "this" that you were referring to in your title of this thread??

 

[DiveCon]

And yet you are the troll who can only attack other poster as you neg rep them and make false claims like the one where you claim "you are the fucking moron that never backs his shit up" and yet the link I provided earlier did just that.

Even when proven WRONG you still lack the integrity to admit it. LOL

except you have NEVER proven me wrong, dipshit

The fact that I posted a link that backs up my argument in this very thread counters your LIE that I never back up my arguments. Therefore you have been proven WRONG. LOL

Thanks for playing but as usual you lose.

like i give a fuck what you think

 

[drsmith1072]

except he didnt dipshit
he said there were claims of RACISM

Actually moron he did.

lol....that is the best they got.

As hard as they tried..with all of the ralleys...the closest they got to racism was an accusation but no recording of it (despite hundreds of cameras and recorders there)....and a man claiming he was spit on when it is quite obvious that the "spitter" was screaming and not actually spitting...and everyone knows that saliva forms in your mouth and sometimes inadvertanly shoots out of it when you are enthusiastic about something.

Yep...thats the best they got.

He tried to claim that I posted that link based on claims of racism when I never mentioned race. He is the one that brought it up.

Thanks for the spin but your dishonesty is poking out. you better have that looked at. LOL

you lying sack of shit
he did no such thing there

The FACTS and his own words prove otherwise. He said "this" in response to the content my post and then said "they" which was directed at me as he went on a rant and tried to attribute racism as the reason the clip was posted.

He was wrong and so are you.

Thanks for making it so easy to prove you wrong. LOL

 

[drsmith1072]

except you have NEVER proven me wrong, dipshit

The fact that I posted a link that backs up my argument in this very thread counters your LIE that I never back up my arguments. Therefore you have been proven WRONG. LOL

Thanks for playing but as usual you lose.

like i give a fuck what you think

Apparently you do or else you wouldn't troll in and attack me as you neg rep me because you have nothing valid to offer and are so easilly exposed as a trolling hack who pretends not to care when proven WRONG even as his trolling shows otherwise. LOL

 

[DiveCon]

Actually moron he did.



He tried to claim that I posted that link based on claims of racism when I never mentioned race. He is the one that brought it up.

Thanks for the spin but your dishonesty is poking out. you better have that looked at. LOL

you lying sack of shit
he did no such thing there

The FACTS and his own words prove otherwise. He said "this" in response to the content my post and then said "they" which was directed at me as he went on a rant and tried to attribute racism as the reason the clip was posted.

He was wrong and so are you.

Thanks for making it so easy to prove you wrong. LOL

you lying sack of shit
you are the one that's wrong
LOL