Prosecutor Fired for Attending Conference

The ClayTaurus said:
I'm not really interested in who my ideas satisfy, nor am I concerned with whether or not someone considers me a racist.

Well aren't you a big boy.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Well aren't you a big boy.
You should make t-shirts: "Have you thanked a white man for our society today?" and then on the back it could say: "Well, you're welcome!"



and then minorities could have a shirt that said "Thank you sir, may I have another?"

That'd be grand.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
You should make t-shirts: "Have you thanked a white man for our society today?" and then on the back it could say: "Well, you're welcome!"



and then minorities could have a shirt that said "Thank you sir, may I have another?"

That'd be grand.

Actually Im thinking of the slogan: "Reject White Guilt". For bumper stickers, mugs and t- shirts. And also "Socialism is Stealing"
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Actually Im thinking of the slogan: "Reject White Guilt". For bumper stickers, mugs and t- shirts. And also "Socialism is Stealing"

civil_blackred.jpg


Courtesy of The Best Page in the Universe
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Actually Im thinking of the slogan: "Reject White Guilt". For bumper stickers, mugs and t- shirts. And also "Socialism is Stealing"
Yours might be catchier, slogan wise, but I still favor the undertones in mine. Maybe we can throw your slogan on the back of my shirts, instead of what I had.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Yours might be catchier, slogan wise, but I still favor the undertones in mine. Maybe we can throw your slogan on the back of my shirts, instead of what I had.

We don't want thanks. We would just like to NOT be villified with hateful lies.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
We don't want thanks. We would just like to NOT be villified with hateful lies.
Of course you want thanks. Why would you not want to be thanked for creating this freedom-flourishing society?
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Of course you want thanks. Why would you not want to be thanked for creating this freedom-flourishing society?

It's just not necessary. Again, I'd be satisfied just not being labelled as pure evil.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Of course you want thanks. Why would you not want to be thanked for creating this freedom-flourishing society?

I do not want to be thanked because doing my best to work towards a freedom-flourishing society is my God-given duty as a human being of any color. Not being thanked means that I'm doing my job, since nobody realizes how much those freedoms really cost because I keep those who threaten them far away. Once I get villified for being white, though, I draw the line.
 
Hobbit said:
I do not want to be thanked because doing my best to work towards a freedom-flourishing society is my God-given duty as a human being of any color. Not being thanked means that I'm doing my job, since nobody realizes how much those freedoms really cost because I keep those who threaten them far away. Once I get villified for being white, though, I draw the line.
You also, are quite the big boy. Congrats.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Are people equating the NAACP to the KKK?

Ideal-wise .... what should one think of an organization titled "National Association for the Advancement of Colored People"?

Method-wise, no. The KKK believes in the use of violence to achieve their ends. The NAACP believes in using politically correct, racially-biased laws to achieve theirs.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Pay attention to the subject of this thread, then apply it to my statements about congregation and KKK apologists. A little clearer now? The basement doesn't ventilate well, I realize, so I'm willing to be patient.

Give me a list of the top 3-5 things you'd like to celebrate about being white. I'm curious what aspects especially strike a chord of pride in your heart.

Perhaps YOU should pay attention and read the article. What you presume to label "KKK apologists" is defined in the article as "what some call a white supremacist group." Sounds like typical PC smoke-blowing to me.

The difference between whites and non-whites is we don't celebrate our skin color. Doesn't mean we should be ashamed of it.
 
GunnyL said:
Perhaps YOU should pay attention and read the article. What you presume to label "KKK apologists" is defined in the article as "what some call a white supremacist group." Sounds like typical PC smoke-blowing to me.
I think it's a fair assessment of anywhere David Duke shows up, but hey, that's just me. You wanna look at things in a vacuum, be my guest.
GunnyL said:
The difference between whites and non-whites is we don't celebrate our skin color. Doesn't mean we should be ashamed of it.
So don't be ashamed of it. Quite simple, actually.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
I think it's a fair assessment of anywhere David Duke shows up, but hey, that's just me. You wanna look at things in a vacuum, be my guest.

This has got to be THE dumbest response I've seen you make. Your comment is presumptive, not to mention ridiculous.

So don't be ashamed of it. Quite simple, actually.

Quite simply, actually, I'm not.
 
GunnyL said:
Quite simply, actually, I'm not.
So skip the ego boosting insults and explain how a meeting with David Duke in attendence probably isn't full of KKK apologists...
 
The ClayTaurus said:
So skip the ego boosting insults and explain how a meeting with David Duke in attendence probably isn't full of KKK apologists...

What is there to explain? You speak for David Duke's every motive? Are you saying this isn't a free country for him or anyone that might be where he decides to go? This WAS a public meeting, correct?

What you are basically saying is that if he happens to show up my church, the entire congregation is suddenly KKK apologists. So, by that line fo thinking, if YOU walk in, were all liberals? Heaven forbid.
 
GunnyL said:
What is there to explain? You speak for David Duke's every motive? Are you saying this isn't a free country for him or anyone that might be where he decides to go? This WAS a public meeting, correct?

What you are basically saying is that if he happens to show up my church, the entire congregation is suddenly KKK apologists. So, by that line fo thinking, if YOU walk in, were all liberals? Heaven forbid.
Get a clue. David Duke showing up at your mom's house doesn't make your mom a kkk sympathizer; no one can control where David Duke goes. If he shows up at a white preservationist meeting, however, it's not a stretch to assume that other kkk apologists are in attendance. But hey, maybe David's tupperware party got cancelled and he just happened to stumble across the meeting on his way to get an oil change. I'm sure his appearance was in no way facilitated by the New Century Foundation. :rolleyes:
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Get a clue. David Duke showing up at your mom's house doesn't make your mom a kkk sympathizer; no one can control where David Duke goes. If he shows up at a white preservationist meeting, however, it's not a stretch to assume that other kkk apologists are in attendance. But hey, maybe David's tupperware party got cancelled and he just happened to stumble across the meeting on his way to get an oil change. I'm sure his appearance was in no way facilitated by the New Century Foundation. :rolleyes:

So, besides your presumption based on David Duke's presence, what evidence do you have to support calling white preservationists "kkk apologists," or that ANY "kkk sympathizers/members" are even in attendance?

The fact is, nonwhites doing exactly the same thing are called "sticking up for their ethnicity" while whites doing EXACTLY the same thing are called racists, and/or "kkk sympathizers" by you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top