25 Reason Trump won't pay a dime to E Carrol...

[Care4all]

You couldn't convince 1 Trump hater that the sky was blue if it helped Trump in any way. That is the problem with the judge, the jury and the location of the trial.

I didn't need to convince anyone of anything, that is the defense lawyer's job....

The lawyers needed to convince one juror out of 12, that he was NOT libel.... That's easier than convincing 12 that he's libel or guilty.... even with a jury consisting of 85% democrats and 15% trump voters, as Manhattan has... Imo.

 

[DBA]

I didn't need to convince anyone of anything, that is the defense lawyer's job....

The lawyers needed to convince one juror out of 12, that he was NOT libel.... That's easier than convincing 12 that he's libel or guilty.... even with a jury consisting of 85% democrats and 15% trump voters, as Manhattan has... Imo.

Trump would not have been prosecuted outside of NYC for this or the fraud case. The lawyers in this case knew it as does James. The reason for that is a very tainted jury and very tainted judges.

 

[rightwinger]

Trump would not have been prosecuted outside of NYC for this or the fraud case. The lawyers in this case knew it as does James. The reason for that is a very tainted jury and very tainted judges.

It is where Trump did the crimes

Trump needs to do more crimes in Alabama and Mississippi, he will get more favorable juries

 

[bripat9643]

Well it's good to know that you're clueless.

TRUMP BRAGGED ABOUT RAPING WOMEN. Now he says it never happened. He bragged about it in this deposition for this trial.

START LISTENING TO WHAT TRUMP SAID. HE WAS CONVICTED BY HIS OWN WORDS. HE ADMITTED TO RAPIING THIS WOMAN

No, he didn't, you fucking dingbat

 

[Dragonlady]

Trump would not have been prosecuted outside of NYC for this or the fraud case. The lawyers in this case knew it as does James. The reason for that is a very tainted jury and very tainted judges.

IT WAS A CIVIL LAW SUIT NOT A PROSECUTION.

He would’ve been sued he would have been sued for libel in any state of the union, and Ms. Carroll would’ve won

 

[DBA]

IT WAS A CIVIL LAW SUIT NOT A PROSECUTION.

He would’ve been sued he would have been sued for libel in any state of the union, and Ms. Carroll would’ve won

There is absolutely no way my state would have issued a judgement like the one the wacky leftists judge issued in NYC. It would have been a slap on the wrist, if anything at all. Likely nothing as no reasonable judge would want to hear the case.

 

[Faun]

No, he didn't, you fucking dingbat

True, fucking moron. He only bragged about sexually assaulting some of them.

 

[berg80]

25 Reasons Trump won't pay a dime to E Carrol​

Is one of them bankruptcy?

 

[bripat9643]

True, fucking moron. He only bragged about sexually assaulting some of them.

Big fucking lie.

 

[Faun]

Big fucking lie.

Nope, no lie, he said he just walks up to women and starts kissing them. Claims they let celebrities grab them by the pussy. No doubt so do. No doubt, some don't. Some 2 dozen claim they did.

 

[IM2]

Trump would not have been prosecuted outside of NYC for this or the fraud case. The lawyers in this case knew it as does James. The reason for that is a very tainted jury and very tainted judges.

Yes he would.

 

[DBA]

I didn't need to convince anyone of anything, that is the defense lawyer's job....

The lawyers needed to convince one juror out of 12, that he was NOT libel.... That's easier than convincing 12 that he's libel or guilty.... even with a jury consisting of 85% democrats and 15% trump voters, as Manhattan has... Imo.

Normally I would say that it is easier, however, this is a very high profile case and if there is 1-2 non-Trump haters on the jury they will be heavily ostracized by the others during deliberation and likely afterwards if they hang the jury. This case should have been tried somewhere where there is a more of a 50/50 split among voters.

 

[krichton]

Oh sure, because these judges respect Trump’s 1a right…GTFOH…

What does the first amendment have to do with trump taking the stand? LMAO

 

[j-mac]

What does the first amendment have to do with trump taking the stand? LMAO

Considering the opening here, Trump doesn’t have to.

 

[Care4all]

Normally I would say that it is easier, however, this is a very high profile case and if there is 1-2 non-Trump haters on the jury they will be heavily ostracized by the others during deliberation and likely afterwards if they hang the jury. This case should have been tried somewhere where there is a more of a 50/50 split among voters.

The 6th Amendment of the constitution dictates that the trial be held in the State and district the crime was committed.

Amendment VI​

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

 

[DBA]

The 6th Amendment of the constitution dictates that the trial be held in the State and district the crime was committed.

Amendment VI​

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Does the defendant have the right to request to have the trial moved if they don’t feel they can get an impartial jury? Who ultimately determines if the defendant’s grounds for a change in venue are valid? I’ll give you a hint. It’s the judge. If the judge and the jury are tainted, you have no chance. Due process is a thing. Read the 14 Amendment. The 6th Amendment works under the assumption that the judge is impartial. You are over-simplifying the process and not giving proper attention to the “impartial jury” portion of the amendment.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Does the defendant have the right to request to have the trial moved if they don’t feel they can get an impartial jury? Who ultimately determines if the defendant’s grounds for a change in venue are valid? I’ll give you a hint. It’s the judge. If the judge and the jury are tainted, you have no chance. Due process is a thing. Read the 14 Amendment. The 6th Amendment works under the assumption that the judge is impartial. You are over-simplifying the process and not giving proper attention to the “impartial jury” portion of the amendment.

And if the Judge decides that a change of venue is not warranted, then the defendant can make an interlocutory appeal to the appellate division court for that state prior to trial and the decision is taken out of the trial judges hands.

WW

 

[bripat9643]

Nope, no lie, he said he just walks up to women and starts kissing them. Claims they let celebrities grab them by the pussy. No doubt so do. No doubt, some don't. Some 2 dozen claim they did.

pay attention: they said they let him. That isn't rape or sexual assault. It happens millions of times a day.

 

[Faun]

pay attention: they said they let him. That isn't rape or sexual assault. It happens millions of times a day.

LOL

No, fucking moron, they didn't say they let him. Trump says they let him. Some said they didn't let him.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??

 

[bripat9643]

LOL

No, fucking moron, they didn't say they let him. Trump says they let him. Some said they didn't let him.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??

He said they let him. They weren't part of the conversion, dumbass. What you say doesn't matter.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?