Of course, there's nothing wrong with our voting machines, and you can't prove it

[TemplarKormac]

Yes I can:

 

[theDoctorisIn]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

 

[Vigilante]

 

[S.J.]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

Is that your go to video to make the case that your corrupt gangster party doesn't engage in election fraud? So far, that's the only one you've come up with.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

Is that your go to video to make the case that your corrupt gangster party doesn't engage in election fraud? So far, that's the only one you've come up with.

And aside from the machines in the OP, how many can you "come up with"?

 

[S.J.]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

Is that your go to video to make the case that your corrupt gangster party doesn't engage in election fraud? So far, that's the only one you've come up with.

And aside from the machines in the OP, how many can you "come up with"?

So you admit that's the only one you have?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

Is that your go to video to make the case that your corrupt gangster party doesn't engage in election fraud? So far, that's the only one you've come up with.

And aside from the machines in the OP, how many can you "come up with"?

So you admit that's the only one you have?

I don't "have" any of them. I don't keep a collection on my computer.

I found that one through Google, if I felt the need to find another one, I'm sure I could.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

That only proves my point. If it can happen there, then it can happen anywhere, with any candidate in any election. Seriously.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

That only proves my point. If it can happen there, then it can happen anywhere, with any candidate in any election. Seriously.

If your problem is with touch-screen voting machine, I'm with you 100%.

 

[S.J.]

Calibration issue pops up on Maryland voting machines Fox News

Claims increase of machines switching votes in Ohio other battlegrounds Fox News

Chicago Way Voting Machines Changing Republican Votes to Democrat Blamed on a 8216 Calibration Error 8217

 

[TemplarKormac]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

That only proves my point. If it can happen there, then it can happen anywhere, with any candidate in any election. Seriously.

If your problem is with touch-screen voting machine, I'm with you 100%.

Yes, of course, I've seen and read about it happening as far back as 2004, when Bush won. Neither party is immune, or blameless. Our voting system is broken, this is but one example in a million others that prove it.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

That only proves my point. If it can happen there, then it can happen anywhere, with any candidate in any election. Seriously.

If your problem is with touch-screen voting machine, I'm with you 100%.

Yes, of course, I've seen and read about it happening as far back as 2004, when Bush won. Neither party is immune, or blameless. Our voting system is broken, this is but one example in a million others that prove it.

Again, it's not that the "system" is broken, it's the voting machines that are broken.

There are plenty of states that don't use touch screen voting machines.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No, you can't.

You can prove there's something wrong with that voting machine.

There was something wrong with this one, too:

That only proves my point. If it can happen there, then it can happen anywhere, with any candidate in any election. Seriously.

If your problem is with touch-screen voting machine, I'm with you 100%.

Yes, of course, I've seen and read about it happening as far back as 2004, when Bush won. Neither party is immune, or blameless. Our voting system is broken, this is but one example in a million others that prove it.

Again, it's not that the "system" is broken, it's the voting machines that are broken.

There are plenty of states that don't use touch screen voting machines.

Really? 33 of 50 states use either full Direct recording electronic machines, or a mix of paper and DRE machines, 17 don't. Those states voting by paper ballot suffer some of the same issues as those who use electronics. Remember the 2000 election? That's what spurred the move to electronic voting machines. Seems though they haven't fixed the problem.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's how Kerry lost Ohio, isn't it?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Everyone should use the lever type machines we use in NY.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I've always liked the lever machines in NY.

Nothing digital about them, which prevents them from being "hacked" in any way.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I've always liked the lever machines in NY.

Nothing digital about them, which prevents them from being "hacked" in any way.

They are the perfect example for the old cliche if it aint broke don't fix it.