Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Still waiting though. Does ANYONE out there agree that 120 ppm CO2 is statistically insignficant or that it is below the resolution of instruments used to measure it? Does anyone else out there believe we can't actually detect 120 ppm change in CO2 level? Does anyone else out there think a 40% change in CO2 is "statistically insignificant"? Anyone?
Your a moron.. Please do the math. At 26 deg C, under 1000mb pressure, and concentration of 400ppm in the near surface, How much absorption of CO2 into the water will occur in a 24 hr period?
Average salinity of the water? What microbes are present? what other factors will increase or decrease absorption?
Crick, the amount absorbed is directly correlated to air movement, ambient air temp, water temp and waves. As this is different all over the world, the rates are different. You keep trying to make CO2 something its not. IN a static experiment as I indicated above there was no measurable dissolved CO2. At 26 Deg C CO2 uptake is immeasurable and if there was CO2 in the fluid, it would expand and rise to the surface. 120 ppm is insignificant except to plants that use it to grow.
immeasurable
Syllabification: im·meas·ur·a·ble
Pronunciation: /i(m)ˈmeZH(ə)rəb(ə)l /
ADJECTIVE
large, extensive, or extreme to measure:immeasurable suffering
Now Billy Boob, you had better stick to words of no more than two syllables. For your immeasurable stupidity is surely showing.