Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was designed to stop the net job lost which it did.
So, once passed, the unemployment rate stayed steady or improved?
Otherwise, what you claim is demonstrably false.
It wasn't designed to create a lot of permanent jobs.
So you acknowledge that it was a scam? Smoke and mirrors designed to deceive the American public?
I applaud your honesty. Of course you are correct, there was no intent to improve the economy, this was a looting of the public treasury by the well connected, ergo the "pork" in "Porkulus."
It's purpose was to slow job lost, giving the private sector time to begin creating jobs.
Really?
Is that what the Obama administration claimed when pushing passage? Or is that just a rewrite of history to cover for the abysmal failure of the program?
At it's peak, it was fully or partially funding over 2 million jobs. Currently it's funding just over 400,000 jobs. Much of the money went to local government, funding road projects law enforcement, fire fighters, and teacher salaries. Now that the funds are drying up, governments are laying off a lot people. In 2011, state and local governments have cut nearly 250,000 jobs. The federal government has cut over 100,000.
Without ARRA, things would have been worse and the recovery would have been slower.
There is absolutely no evidence to support such a claim. The effect of sending out checks to taxpayers would have been more positive, as the Bush "rebates" demonstrate. The ARRA was a clusterfuck, a complete disaster.