Not all poor people are democrat!

Not all poor people are dems.

Why do I keep seeing people suggesting otherwise as if it's a fact?

Because, Rs want to keep poor people poor.

Because, if one is elderly, a child, a person of color, a woman, unemployed, gay, educated etc etc, the Rs see you as the enemy and works to take everything you own away from you.

Because, no one can continue to believe in people who want to hurt you and Rs want to hurt you. And, because, as we see on this board, Rs LIE. You cannot simultaneously be R and HONEST.

It really is that simple.
It's a shame you fucked up and got your rep taken away.
 
Being generous with other people's money is not generosity. It's liberalism.
Why am I not surprised you are desperately trying to change the subject? Lying about the poor being Liberal leeches is CON$ervoFascism.
If you weren't such a screeching lunatic, you might be interesting to talk with.
You still can't admit that the Libs are the achievers and the CON$ are the slackers.
 
If you weren't such a screeching lunatic, you might be interesting to talk with.
You still can't admit that the Libs are the achievers and the CON$ are the slackers.

Probably because it's not true?
As I already posted, CON$ admit that Libs are more financially successful than CON$ when they brag about their generosity, which is why davebaby desperately tried to change the subject. CON$ are such lazy slackers, rather than even try to achieve as much as the Libs, they simply declare themselves achievers without having to earn it. Libs are the makers, which is why they are wealthier, and CON$ are the takers.
 
Why am I not surprised you are desperately trying to change the subject? Lying about the poor being Liberal leeches is CON$ervoFascism.
If you weren't such a screeching lunatic, you might be interesting to talk with.
You still can't admit that the Libs are the achievers and the CON$ are the slackers.

Why would I contradict reality?

Seen and OWS group lately? Nothing but lazy freeloaders.
 
Not all poor people are dems.

Why do I keep seeing people suggesting otherwise as if it's a fact?

Because, Rs want to keep poor people poor.

Because, if one is elderly, a child, a person of color, a woman, unemployed, gay, educated etc etc, the Rs see you as the enemy and works to take everything you own away from you.

Because, no one can continue to believe in people who want to hurt you and Rs want to hurt you. And, because, as we see on this board, Rs LIE. You cannot simultaneously be R and HONEST.

It really is that simple.
It's a shame you fucked up and got your rep taken away.

Nobody cares about rep but idiot pub dupes. Jut like the Pubs, Pub pundits, orgs, "institutes" all backing up each others' Pubcrappe...a whole alternate universe, a world laughingstock/horror...
 
If you weren't such a screeching lunatic, you might be interesting to talk with.
You still can't admit that the Libs are the achievers and the CON$ are the slackers.

Why would I contradict reality?

Seen and OWS group lately? Nothing but lazy freeloaders.
And your MessiahRushie has a daily audience of 40 million DittoNazis who for the most part have no jobs. Working people have jobs during his hours.
 
Because, Rs want to keep poor people poor.

Because, if one is elderly, a child, a person of color, a woman, unemployed, gay, educated etc etc, the Rs see you as the enemy and works to take everything you own away from you.

Because, no one can continue to believe in people who want to hurt you and Rs want to hurt you. And, because, as we see on this board, Rs LIE. You cannot simultaneously be R and HONEST.

It really is that simple.
It's a shame you fucked up and got your rep taken away.

Nobody cares about rep but idiot pub dupes. Jut like the Pubs, Pub pundits, orgs, "institutes" all backing up each others' Pubcrappe...a whole alternate universe, a world laughingstock/horror...
Does it worry you that you're so incoherent?
 
You still can't admit that the Libs are the achievers and the CON$ are the slackers.

Why would I contradict reality?

Seen and OWS group lately? Nothing but lazy freeloaders.
And your MessiahRushie has a daily audience of 40 million DittoNazis who for the most part have no jobs. Working people have jobs during his hours.
I'd ask for a link to that "fact", but there's no URL to your colon.
 
Because, Rs want to keep poor people poor.

Because, if one is elderly, a child, a person of color, a woman, unemployed, gay, educated etc etc, the Rs see you as the enemy and works to take everything you own away from you.

Because, no one can continue to believe in people who want to hurt you and Rs want to hurt you. And, because, as we see on this board, Rs LIE. You cannot simultaneously be R and HONEST.

It really is that simple.
It's a shame you fucked up and got your rep taken away.

Nobody cares about rep but idiot pub dupes. Jut like the Pubs, Pub pundits, orgs, "institutes" all backing up each others' Pubcrappe...a whole alternate universe, a world laughingstock/horror...
It obviously kills davebaby much more that he can't spitefully neg luddly.
 
Why would I contradict reality?

Seen and OWS group lately? Nothing but lazy freeloaders.
And your MessiahRushie has a daily audience of 40 million DittoNazis who for the most part have no jobs. Working people have jobs during his hours.
I'd ask for a link to that "fact", but there's no URL to your colon.
April 14, 2011
RUSH:*the middle of the day was the absolute worst time to be an advertiser on radio because the only people listening were people who have no jobs

May 26, 2011
RUSH:. According to reports at the peak of The Oprah's popularity, her show had 40 million weekly viewers. Now, that's not bad. That's almost as many as we have every day here. So our hat's off to The Oprah, 40 million viewers a week, not bad.
 
Not all poor people are dems.

Why do I keep seeing people suggesting otherwise as if it's a fact?

Actually, one of the primary achievements of the Reagan Revolution was to capture poor working class people in the south and heartland .

This was done primarily through religion, values, patriotism and fear. [You have to study the Family Values campaign starting with Goldwater and turned into an industry under Reagan, with a network of think tanks and publishing groups designed to transform the opinions and sympathies of the poor]

Where the Democrats talked about equality and social justice, the Republicans communicated to the poor through a rhetoric of God, Tradition, Family and Nation - all of which [get ready for the fear] were under siege by atheists, hippies, bra burners, communists, socialists, gays, illegal aliens, terrorists, etc.

From Nixon's silent majority to Reagan Democrats, the Right successfully converted the poor and working class through values populism. Many Reagan Democrats were poor northern Catholic workers who didn't identify with the radicalism of the anti-war, sexually liberated sixties Left.

When the Left abandoned the poor working class to save marginal groups, the Right stepped in.

Indeed, in the sixties FDR's poor working class left was replaced by the McGovern's new left, which was centered in the Northeast. It was driven by effete wealthy college kids, and it was preoccupied with social issues (racism, sexism, alternative lifestyles, etc). The FDR Left was rapidly patriotic, and quite racist in the South. The McGovern Left was critical of the USA, especially the military and its white male power structure. These two versions of the Left could not be more different. Indeed, the cleavage in the Left is what allowed the Right to peel off large sections of the lower and middle class.

Meaning: the Right successfully captured the poor a long time ago. Yes, many poor people and minorities vote Democrat, but you're simply wrong to suggest that it's common knowledge that the poor vote Democrat in post-Reagan America. I don't know anybody who thinks that poor, rural, gun-toting, god fearing, salt-of-the-earth bible thumpers vote Democrat.

(The OP's premise sounds like a silly simplification made up by someone on the internet and believed by someone else on the internet)

My advice: turn off talk radio and study history. The Right makes a living off using religion, patriotism, gays, baby killers and foreign demons to capture the poor. This is old news.
 
Last edited:
And your MessiahRushie has a daily audience of 40 million DittoNazis who for the most part have no jobs. Working people have jobs during his hours.
I'd ask for a link to that "fact", but there's no URL to your colon.
April 14, 2011
RUSH:*the middle of the day was the absolute worst time to be an advertiser on radio because the only people listening were people who have no jobs

May 26, 2011
RUSH:. According to reports at the peak of The Oprah's popularity, her show had 40 million weekly viewers. Now, that's not bad. That's almost as many as we have every day here. So our hat's off to The Oprah, 40 million viewers a week, not bad.

ZZZZIIIIINNNNNGGGGGGGG!!!!!!
Score 1 for the edster!
 
And your MessiahRushie has a daily audience of 40 million DittoNazis who for the most part have no jobs. Working people have jobs during his hours.
I'd ask for a link to that "fact", but there's no URL to your colon.
April 14, 2011
RUSH:*the middle of the day was the absolute worst time to be an advertiser on radio because the only people listening were people who have no jobs

May 26, 2011
RUSH:. According to reports at the peak of The Oprah's popularity, her show had 40 million weekly viewers. Now, that's not bad. That's almost as many as we have every day here. So our hat's off to The Oprah, 40 million viewers a week, not bad.
:lmao: I bet you think that proves your point. :lol:

Oh, by the way: Oprah viewers are predominantly liberal. So that's 40 million libs without a job.

:lmao:
 
Not all poor people are dems.

Why do I keep seeing people suggesting otherwise as if it's a fact?

What's your point?

Nobody said all, however the vast majority are because they get government handouts and free stuff.

Be nice if you could prove that, but I don't expect you will,it is so much easier o spew complete and utter lies with a dash of propaganda, like your sig line.

Only quickly findable chart I could dig up with numbers on party affiliation by income

517-24.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top