Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #61
Note they wont answer my question
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because Republicans want the middle class to hate the poor, so they won't notice the rich walking away with all the money.
It's THEIR money, idiot!
So the bailout was their money?
LIAR
that is not waht biden said.
He said the monied interests would shackle us again if they could and they would.
Trayvon did NOT deserve to die and only a racist would think he did
Not all poor people are dems.
Why do I keep seeing people suggesting otherwise as if it's a fact?
It's THEIR money, idiot!
So the bailout was their money?
Yes, it was. Their money that the government confiscated to play political favoritism with.
Not all poor people are dems.
Why do I keep seeing people suggesting otherwise as if it's a fact?
No shit! But most democrats are poor people.
Actually, most poor people don't know shit about politics and only vote because democrat organizers are on the street in the ghetto handing out free shit to anyone who will register - then they push them on a bus to go vote democrat.... Yeah they give them a free lunch and other shit like vouchers along with a lecture on why democrats are good and republicans are bad....
Hell democrats have gone as far as to abduct and force the mentally disabled to vote democrat....
Not all poor people are dems.
Why do I keep seeing people suggesting otherwise as if it's a fact?
No shit! But most democrats are poor people.
Actually, most poor people don't know shit about politics and only vote because democrat organizers are on the street in the ghetto handing out free shit to anyone who will register - then they push them on a bus to go vote democrat.... Yeah they give them a free lunch and other shit like vouchers along with a lecture on why democrats are good and republicans are bad....
Hell democrats have gone as far as to abduct and force the mentally disabled to vote democrat....
He [Ki Gulbranson] says that too many Americans lean on taxpayers rather than living within their means. He supports politicians who promise to cut government spending. In 2010, he printed T-shirts for the Tea Party campaign of a neighbor, Chip Cravaack, who ousted this region’s long-serving Democratic congressman.
Yet this year, as in each of the past three years, Mr. Gulbranson, 57, is counting on a payment of several thousand dollars from the federal government, a subsidy for working families called the earned-income tax credit. He has signed up his three school-age children to eat free breakfast and lunch at federal expense. And Medicare paid for his mother, 88, to have hip surgery twice.
The newly poor, the ones forced into poverty by obama's policies won't vote democrat.
What's your point?
Nobody said all, however the vast majority are because they get government handouts and free stuff.
Au contraire, most of Ayn Rand's "moochers" vote Republican-----based on "distribution of dependency" of so-called red states vs blue states, Republicans are more likely to benefit from the programs they vote against than Democrats are. But-----but then red states tend to be the least educated states in the USofA
Moochers Against Welfare
✄snip>
The article made its case with maps showing the distribution of dependency, but you get the same story from a more formal comparison. Aaron Carroll of Indiana University tells us that in 2010, residents of the 10 states Gallup ranks as most conservative received 21.2 percent of their income in government transfers, while the number for the 10 most liberal states was only 17.1 percent.
Now, theres no mystery about red-state reliance on government programs. These states are relatively poor, which means both that people have fewer sources of income other than safety-net programs and that more of them qualify for means-tested programs such as Medicaid.
By the way, the same logic explains why there has been a jump in dependency since 2008. Contrary to what Mr. Santorum and Mr. Romney suggest, Mr. Obama has not radically expanded the safety net. Rather, the dire state of the economy has reduced incomes and made more people eligible for benefits, especially unemployment benefits. Basically, the safety net is the same, but more people are falling into it
✄snip>
Government money?
Really? Government money?
Do tell, Where does the government get their money?
Not all poor people are dems.
Why do I keep seeing people suggesting otherwise as if it's a fact?
What's your point?
Nobody said all, however the vast majority are because they get government handouts and free stuff.
yeap the right hates the poor
If you weren't such a screeching lunatic, you might be interesting to talk with.Why am I not surprised you are desperately trying to change the subject? Lying about the poor being Liberal leeches is CON$ervoFascism.Being generous with other people's money is not generosity. It's liberalism.Funny thing is the Right admit that the Libs are the financial achievers when they want to boast about how much more generous CON$ are on less income.
This may come as a shock to you, but you don't get to define what's in other people's best interests.yes the poor whites in the south are often republicans.
They are the people you saw holding up signs like "keep your government hands off my medicare"
Well no they aren't. And the GOP hardly has a lock on morons. Do I need to repost the Howard Stern tape of Obama voters?
and yet, howard stern likes the president. go figure. but go ahead and rely on one comedy bit.
voting against one's own interests is stupid...espectially when it's done because of G-d, guns and gays.