Not a single witness testified publicly during the Clinton Impeachment trial.

Who cares!?!!?!

I still don’t see what the Democrats saw as wrong with the phone call. It’s not as if Trump asked them to make up charges. This is stupid. Bidens are dirty. Why is it wrong to inquire about it?

Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.

If the Bidens are dirty - investigate. You guys own the DoJ. Otherwise it's just rhetoric.
Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript.
 
Who cares!?!!?!

I still don’t see what the Democrats saw as wrong with the phone call. It’s not as if Trump asked them to make up charges. This is stupid. Bidens are dirty. Why is it wrong to inquire about it?

Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.

If the Bidens are dirty - investigate. You guys own the DoJ. Otherwise it's just rhetoric.
Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript.

Just like I said: Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.
 
Who cares!?!!?!

I still don’t see what the Democrats saw as wrong with the phone call. It’s not as if Trump asked them to make up charges. This is stupid. Bidens are dirty. Why is it wrong to inquire about it?

Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.

If the Bidens are dirty - investigate. You guys own the DoJ. Otherwise it's just rhetoric.
Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript.

Just like I said: Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.
As I said, Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript. If Clinton told the truth then it would have been business as usual.
 
Who cares!?!!?!

I still don’t see what the Democrats saw as wrong with the phone call. It’s not as if Trump asked them to make up charges. This is stupid. Bidens are dirty. Why is it wrong to inquire about it?

Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.

If the Bidens are dirty - investigate. You guys own the DoJ. Otherwise it's just rhetoric.
Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript.

Just like I said: Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.
As I said, Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript. If Clinton told the truth then it would have been business as usual.

Trump released a partial memo of a phone call, not a transcript. And you miss the point. It's not about just a phone call.
 
Who cares!?!!?!

I still don’t see what the Democrats saw as wrong with the phone call. It’s not as if Trump asked them to make up charges. This is stupid. Bidens are dirty. Why is it wrong to inquire about it?

Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.

If the Bidens are dirty - investigate. You guys own the DoJ. Otherwise it's just rhetoric.
Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript.

Just like I said: Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.
As I said, Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript. If Clinton told the truth then it would have been business as usual.

Trump released a partial memo of a phone call, not a transcript. And you miss the point. It's not about just a phone call.

For once, you are right. It’s really about President Trump not going along with the globalist Agenda, starting with his victory of Hillary, and most recently his refusal to get us into an invasion/occupation war in Syria.
 
Who cares!?!!?!

I still don’t see what the Democrats saw as wrong with the phone call. It’s not as if Trump asked them to make up charges. This is stupid. Bidens are dirty. Why is it wrong to inquire about it?

Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.

If the Bidens are dirty - investigate. You guys own the DoJ. Otherwise it's just rhetoric.
Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript.

Just like I said: Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.
As I said, Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript. If Clinton told the truth then it would have been business as usual.

Trump released a partial memo of a phone call, not a transcript. And you miss the point. It's not about just a phone call.
Pretty sure it was the whole transcript
 
Trump demanded they announce an investigation publicly, something of value to him personally, in return for US aid and favors. If he had asked for a bag of gold would you still not see anything wrong?

It blew my mind when his lawyers argued that his re-election was in the national interest. That opens quite a door. If Biden shot Trump dead could he argue that it was to ensure Biden's election and in the national interest so he couldn't be guilty of a crime.

If one of our politicians is 'dirty' shouldn't it be the US that investigates? Will Ukraine's evidence be admissible in US courts? There are existing avenues if Trump was truly worried about corruption but they would have taken years and not been made public. They might have found Biden was 'dirty' but they would have not affected the coming election.


Link to this "demand"?
To me a demand is 'do this or else'. Go read the transcript of July 25 or just ask Bolton.
He never said do this or else. He said could you help us as our country has been through a lot.
He said could you help us as our country has been through a lot and your aid and WH visit will wait until you do.
He didn’t say the 2nd part. Link that.
Read the testimony of those the WH has not prevented from testifying.
 
Link to this "demand"?
To me a demand is 'do this or else'. Go read the transcript of July 25 or just ask Bolton.
He never said do this or else. He said could you help us as our country has been through a lot.
He said could you help us as our country has been through a lot and your aid and WH visit will wait until you do.
He didn’t say the 2nd part. Link that.
Read the testimony of those the WH has not prevented from testifying.
Testifying about the phone call transcript that was released for all to see? Again, I would agree with you if he asked Zelensky to make up charges against the Bidens but even you have to admit the Burisma fiasco is highly suspicious at best.
 
Testifying about the phone call transcript that was released for all to see? Again, I would agree with you if he asked Zelensky to make up charges against the Bidens but even you have to admit the Burisma fiasco is highly suspicious at best.
First, a transcript is not testimony under oath. BIG legal difference. Second, if Trump was really concerned with global corruption it seems odd that the only instance that seems to have concerned him, in the entire world, was one involving his political opponent.
 
Testifying about the phone call transcript that was released for all to see? Again, I would agree with you if he asked Zelensky to make up charges against the Bidens but even you have to admit the Burisma fiasco is highly suspicious at best.
First, a transcript is not testimony under oath. BIG legal difference. Second, if Trump was really concerned with global corruption it seems odd that the only instance that seems to have concerned him, in the entire world, was one involving his political opponent.
I posted a link where it showed that he sent Rudy there in 2018 before Biden even announced. Even Bolton said Trump was curious about what happened in 2016. What would he do under oath? Read the transcript?
 
I posted a link where it showed that he sent Rudy there in 2018 before Biden even announced. Even Bolton said Trump was curious about what happened in 2016. What would he do under oath? Read the transcript?
Biden was poised to enter the campaign since the 2012 primaries so it wouldn't take a genius to think he might run in 2020.
 
I posted a link where it showed that he sent Rudy there in 2018 before Biden even announced. Even Bolton said Trump was curious about what happened in 2016. What would he do under oath? Read the transcript?
Biden was poised to enter the campaign since the 2012 primaries so it wouldn't take a genius to think he might run in 2020.
I disagree as many thought he was too old and even BHO didn’t endorse him. Back in 2018, Trump wanted to see what happened with the collusion claims as the whole Russia collusion was on peoples minds and he was told Ukraine had a hand in it too. The Burisma data is suspicious. $83k per month to someone who didn’t know the industry or speak the language. Obama’s administration had to give talking point to Yavanavich about it.

This is not as if Trump was trying to make something up. The data is out there for both Trump and Biden. Voters should decide this IMO.
 
Voters should decide this IMO.
I agree. Unfortunately they do not have all the information thanks to the WH refusing to let anyone testify. I might not have supported a vote to remove him from office had the WH been more forthcoming.
In the debates the Democrat candidate should say just that. People will hear it and decide. Glad we agree. If it is Biden vs Trump the debates will matter. Good luck.
 
Who cares!?!!?!

I still don’t see what the Democrats saw as wrong with the phone call. It’s not as if Trump asked them to make up charges. This is stupid. Bidens are dirty. Why is it wrong to inquire about it?
Trump demanded they announce an investigation publicly, something of value to him personally, in return for US aid and favors. If he had asked for a bag of gold would you still not see anything wrong?

It blew my mind when his lawyers argued that his re-election was in the national interest. That opens quite a door. If Biden shot Trump dead could he argue that it was to ensure Biden's election and in the national interest so he couldn't be guilty of a crime.

If one of our politicians is 'dirty' shouldn't it be the US that investigates? Will Ukraine's evidence be admissible in US courts? There are existing avenues if Trump was truly worried about corruption but they would have taken years and not been made public. They might have found Biden was 'dirty' but they would have not affected the coming election.


Link to this "demand"?
To me a demand is 'do this or else'. Go read the transcript of July 25 or just ask Bolton.
I read the transcript. Nowhere in it is "do this or else", liar.
Read it again, this time with a Tony Soprano voice.
Dude, you lied about what Trump said. It's that simple.
 
The Senate called only 3 witnesses, and they were questioned behind closed doors. Only excerpts selected by Dimwingers were allowed public.

I’m sure our resident Dimwingers would be good with doing the same this time, right?

Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia


They don't have to testify publicly. They could have called Mulvaney and Bolton in to testify privately.
That's not the Senate's job, it is the House's job.

Why didn't YOUR House Clowns do their job?
 
Who cares!?!!?!

I still don’t see what the Democrats saw as wrong with the phone call. It’s not as if Trump asked them to make up charges. This is stupid. Bidens are dirty. Why is it wrong to inquire about it?

Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.

If the Bidens are dirty - investigate. You guys own the DoJ. Otherwise it's just rhetoric.
Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript.

Just like I said: Saying it's just about a "phone call" is as dishonest as saying Clinton's impeachment is just about a blowjob.
As I said, Clinton lied. Trump released the transcript. If Clinton told the truth then it would have been business as usual.

Trump released a partial memo of a phone call, not a transcript. And you miss the point. It's not about just a phone call.
It is a transcript. Get new talking points.
 
I posted a link where it showed that he sent Rudy there in 2018 before Biden even announced. Even Bolton said Trump was curious about what happened in 2016. What would he do under oath? Read the transcript?
Biden was poised to enter the campaign since the 2012 primaries so it wouldn't take a genius to think he might run in 2020.
So now you want to impeach for looking in to the corruption of POTENTIAL opponents?
 
Democrats who play dirty expect others to play clean...

I love how Trump roasts them. Don't let playing clean come in the way of winning when dealing with these guys. For regular, non far left guys... sure, then principles can apply.
 
I posted a link where it showed that he sent Rudy there in 2018 before Biden even announced. Even Bolton said Trump was curious about what happened in 2016. What would he do under oath? Read the transcript?
Biden was poised to enter the campaign since the 2012 primaries so it wouldn't take a genius to think he might run in 2020.
So now you want to impeach for looking in to the corruption of POTENTIAL opponents?
I think it shows Trump was only interested in Ukrainian corruption when he thought it might hurt Biden. If he had asked the DOJ to look into Biden and Ukrainian corruption he'd be applauded, the fact that he wanted a PUBLIC announcement that Biden was being investigated is a very different and very corrupt animal. Something I'd expect to find in a swamp.
 

Forum List

Back
Top