New EPA head Scott Pruitt rejects CO2 as primary cause of global warming

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Crick, Mar 9, 2017.

  1. Crick
    Offline

    Crick Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Messages:
    11,463
    Thanks Received:
    926
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    N/A
    Ratings:
    +3,541
    That. I'm afraid is complete bullshit. The current rate of warming is far beyond natural variability.

    So the world getting warmer at a rate never before seen in synch with human CO2 emissions and not in synch with any known warming cycle might indicate that the cause is something other than "natural cycles"
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    26,177
    Thanks Received:
    3,143
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +7,809
    People still not at all getting the story thread title..........which is.........obviously, the warmist contingent has still not made their case.:coffee:
     
  3. Crick
    Offline

    Crick Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Messages:
    11,463
    Thanks Received:
    926
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    N/A
    Ratings:
    +3,541
    The warmist contingent's case may be found at www.ipcc.ch.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Markle
    Online

    Markle Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    5,798
    Thanks Received:
    816
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings:
    +3,581
    There has been no warming in 25 years.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,566
    Thanks Received:
    965
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,670
    Simply not true...the only reconstructions with the resolution required to support such a statement are ice cores and they show periods of warming far greater than anything we have seen.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,566
    Thanks Received:
    965
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,670

    Which is no case at all...
     
  7. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,566
    Thanks Received:
    965
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,670
    He believes that the manipulation and massaging of data equals warming...
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
  8. Crick
    Offline

    Crick Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Messages:
    11,463
    Thanks Received:
    926
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    N/A
    Ratings:
    +3,541
    It is many, many orders of magnitude better - actually infinitely better - than the sum total of evidence supporting your position.

    Sent from my VS985 4G using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,566
    Thanks Received:
    965
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,670
    My position is that there is no observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence supporting your posting and on that one, I win hands down every time as evidenced by your complete inability to deliver such evidence.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Crick
    Offline

    Crick Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Messages:
    11,463
    Thanks Received:
    926
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    N/A
    Ratings:
    +3,541
    You've been given the link repeatedly. The document contains over 1,800 pages of evidence, predominantly empiric, supporting AGW. You've presented jack shit for evidence supporting your contentions. You STILL want us to believe that thousands of PhD scientists are all involved in a massive, perfect, decades-long conspiracy so they can get grant money and destroy the US economy. You are SO FOOKING STOOOOOPID.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page