regent
Gold Member
- Jan 30, 2012
- 10,459
- 1,148
- 245
There he goes again...
Someday when you grow up you may develop the ability to think for yourself, though I doubt you'll ever develop the interest.
If thinking for myself means thinking like you, give it up.
When I have agreeing with me since 1948 noted American historians and presidential experts I'd be a fool not to mention how they agree with my rating of the presidents. Smart cookies one and all. And recently another 238 of America's best historians, a whole new batch, agreed with my ratings of presidents. I also happen to think that America's best historians know more history than both you and I. Well maybe you.
Too funny....you believe the establishment statist historians, but think historians that disagree with those you like, are dunces.
That is most hypocritical. Why believe some historians and not others?
I believe there are levels of historians as there are levels of most professionals. I pefer to accept the history of those historians that other historians accept as good historians. When those top rated historians disagree with me I generally accept their conclusions as valid. But in this situation the top historians agree with me so what could be better? And if some poster disagrees with both me and the better historians, I gotta be honest, I go with the historians. What's a statist historian?