Why did they change the wording from "global warming"? Maybe the globe ain't warming but the climate constantly changes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's a silly response. For one, half the point is to improve the tech and make it more economical....so placing constraints on it based on how it is done today is to miss the point entirely. Furthermore, I noticed your little parlor tricks there. Nobody said it would need to supply the majority of our energy needs all by itself, notrhas anyone said it is the only thing we should do to create sustainable energy.Well that's just complete nonsense. For instance,heavily investing in solar energy research in order to speed up the time it takes for it to be cheaper and cleaner would greatly reduce emissions for all future generations.NOTHING, proposed by you guys, would "save" the planet from the "problem" you claim to be worried about.
No it wouldn't. There are limited reserves of indium and other rare elements needed for solar energy, and most of those reserves are in places like Red China. Solar is a dead end as far as supplying the majority of America's growing energy needs.
that didnt answer my question,,,how many trees did you plant last yr??Sorry, my agenda is the environment, the future of my kids and not leaving them saddled with an environmental catastrophe. Sorry, if that disappoints you.
so tell us how many trees you planted last yr???
LOL my back yard is a jungle because I have refused to cut down a single tree.
I ask because any honest environmentalist knows that trees are the only real solution,,,,all the rest is just fascist bullsht
He can't tell the difference between planting and not cutting.
You guys are really the crown fools of deflection. I have planted trees all over my yard. Do you really have to be led by the hand on every statement.
Why did they change the wording from "global warming"? Maybe the globe ain't warming but the climate constantly changes?
Which is exactly why your tired old denier tack here is absurd. Cut it out.but how many,,,4-5 trees are not going to save the world
Haha, this is so dumb. I am quite certain you have no idea why you just sounded so dumb.It considered "climate change" after Labor Day, it will revert to "global warming" after Easter.
My proposals were free market solutions. For heaven's sake cap and trade is a republican idea.I would consider the following:
Cap and Trade
Honor the Paris Accords limits.
A graduated gas tax. The gas tax would be used to fund green infrastructure.
Investment in green energy and technology
Extended Tax credits for hybrid, electric and plug in cars
Extended tax credits for investments in residential and commercial projects that utilize green energy
.
The reason why you would consider these ideas, because you would consider them regardless of climate change or anything else.
The solution was drawn up first, and the problem was decided on later.
If someone came up with a Free Market solution to bad weather, you'd reject it out of hand. The idea of the whole scam is to impose socialism.
The truth be told, America is one of the least polluted countries on the planet. Red China, Russia, other nations are much dirtier. They just need to do what we're doing.
The only way an alarmist can win the case without any evidence is to do it in an ECHO, Echo, Echo Chamber.. The science is NOT settled. Only a moronic fool who denies science believes that it is.. (In other words a Political Whore)Watching Meet the Press. They have dedicated the whole hour to climate change. They have no deniers on the panel and as Chuck Todd correctly stated the science is long since settled. Now it is time to discuss solutions.
A recent poll shows even a majority of Republicans do not dispute anthropogenic climate change.
Opinion | More Republicans Than You Think Support Action on Climate Change
I applaud Meet the Press. Time to push deniers and their pseudo science to the curb or back into closet. Choose your metaphor. They are just standing in the way and are no more than obstructionists.
We need to discuss only solutions and adaptations.
That's nice kid.Ok, so you're just a fatalist. I hope for your sake you never get that diagnosis.If you get a diagnosis of cancer are you gonna say: "If I've got cancer I've got cancer, it's too late to do anything, I've already got it."?you still have Millions of cars all over the worldI don't have all the answers, but fuel economy standards such as the ones tRump is trying to fuck up are definitely part of it.
that's a drop in the bucket
if the climate has changed, it's too late to do anything--it's changed
Sometimes that is the right response, actually.
And all lefties have offered, is IF your analysis is correct, is to reduce your level of smoking. NOt stop. SLIGHTLY REDUCE.
That is not a solution. It is not even really a good coping mechanism. It is playing with yourself.
Those of us with common sense are gonna try to save the planet, ok?
NOTHING, proposed by you guys, would "save" the planet from the "problem" you claim to be worried about.
It would give the government massive power and funds to oppress US and lower our quality of life.
That's nice kid.Ok, so you're just a fatalist. I hope for your sake you never get that diagnosis.If you get a diagnosis of cancer are you gonna say: "If I've got cancer I've got cancer, it's too late to do anything, I've already got it."?you still have Millions of cars all over the world
that's a drop in the bucket
if the climate has changed, it's too late to do anything--it's changed
Sometimes that is the right response, actually.
And all lefties have offered, is IF your analysis is correct, is to reduce your level of smoking. NOt stop. SLIGHTLY REDUCE.
That is not a solution. It is not even really a good coping mechanism. It is playing with yourself.
Those of us with common sense are gonna try to save the planet, ok?
NOTHING, proposed by you guys, would "save" the planet from the "problem" you claim to be worried about.
It would give the government massive power and funds to oppress US and lower our quality of life.
Really? Last I checked the entire global scientific community has reached a consensus...while, on the other hand, the deniers have been relegated to soothing each other anonymously on internet message boards. I.e., echo Chambers.The only way an alarmist can win the case without any evidence is to do it in an ECHO, Echo, Echo Chamber..
That's nice kid.That's nice kid.Ok, so you're just a fatalist. I hope for your sake you never get that diagnosis.If you get a diagnosis of cancer are you gonna say: "If I've got cancer I've got cancer, it's too late to do anything, I've already got it."?
Sometimes that is the right response, actually.
And all lefties have offered, is IF your analysis is correct, is to reduce your level of smoking. NOt stop. SLIGHTLY REDUCE.
That is not a solution. It is not even really a good coping mechanism. It is playing with yourself.
Those of us with common sense are gonna try to save the planet, ok?
NOTHING, proposed by you guys, would "save" the planet from the "problem" you claim to be worried about.
It would give the government massive power and funds to oppress US and lower our quality of life.
Your admission that you cannot refute my point is accepted.
So, since you admit that your proposals would not work, what is your real agenda?
You want a solution to a made up fantasy problem... Priceless..Well that is the purpose of the debate. To get to a solution that will work.Action and adaptation? Show me where the multi billions, some estimate over a trillion, has resulted in any meaningful action or adaption.I applaud the need to change the debate to action and adaption. The science is settled. There are people still debating whether the earth is round. Time to move on or we will get nowhere.So you applaud bias and non diversity. Got it.
Really? Last I checked the entire global scientific community has reached a consensus...while, on the other hand, the deniers have been relegated to soothing each other anonymously on internet message boards. I.e., echo Chambers.The only way an alarmist can win the case without any evidence is to do it in an ECHO, Echo, Echo Chamber..
So, um, yeah, you pretty much got that one ass backwards.
That's nice kid.That's nice kid.Ok, so you're just a fatalist. I hope for your sake you never get that diagnosis.Sometimes that is the right response, actually.
And all lefties have offered, is IF your analysis is correct, is to reduce your level of smoking. NOt stop. SLIGHTLY REDUCE.
That is not a solution. It is not even really a good coping mechanism. It is playing with yourself.
Those of us with common sense are gonna try to save the planet, ok?
NOTHING, proposed by you guys, would "save" the planet from the "problem" you claim to be worried about.
It would give the government massive power and funds to oppress US and lower our quality of life.
Your admission that you cannot refute my point is accepted.
So, since you admit that your proposals would not work, what is your real agenda?
Wrong again...global scientific community has reached a consensus.
Sophist games?That's nice kid.That's nice kid.Ok, so you're just a fatalist. I hope for your sake you never get that diagnosis.
Those of us with common sense are gonna try to save the planet, ok?
NOTHING, proposed by you guys, would "save" the planet from the "problem" you claim to be worried about.
It would give the government massive power and funds to oppress US and lower our quality of life.
Your admission that you cannot refute my point is accepted.
So, since you admit that your proposals would not work, what is your real agenda?
Your sophist games are noted and dismissed.
What is your real agenda? What is this really about?
He did, pay attention.If climate change is "settled" , why didn't B. Hussein O do anything about it when he was ruling?
please dont peddle that lie,,,the entire global scientific community has not reached a consensus ,,,Really? Last I checked the entire global scientific community has reached a consensus...while, on the other hand, the deniers have been relegated to soothing each other anonymously on internet message boards. I.e., echo Chambers.The only way an alarmist can win the case without any evidence is to do it in an ECHO, Echo, Echo Chamber..
So, um, yeah, you pretty much got that one ass backwards.