Michigan recount over; Pennsylvania sets hearing

so Donald Trump SUED, to stop the recount? Wow!

WHAT in the world was he so AFRAID of...???

Actually the suit that stopped the count was by the Michigan Attorney General. Recounts in Michigan are for the purpose of giving the second place candidate a chance to win. With only 1% of the state's vote, Stein was not injured in the original vote, thus no standing in asking for a recount. States rights, common sense and the legal process were winners.
 
i'm not whining, but TRUMP IS and I'd like to know WHY?

What is he so afraid of....? Why did he sue to stop it?

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER for him to let it go on and SHOW everyone he was without any doubt, the WINNER.
Perhaps on behalf of us Michigan taxpayers who'd be left holding the $3-5 million bag after Jill's circle jerk?
didn't your Secretary of State say it would cost only $978,000 or something like that? Where are you getting your figures from?

No the estimated cost was 4 to 6 million

I thought Stein and the Green party were picking up the tab for this recount bullshit??


No, they contributed some $900,000 thats it the rest the tax payers pay for
 
i'm not whining, but TRUMP IS and I'd like to know WHY?

What is he so afraid of....? Why did he sue to stop it?

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER for him to let it go on and SHOW everyone he was without any doubt, the WINNER.

Let me get this straight, you want to use the legal system to overturn the winner, but the winner using the same laws to protect himself is wrong.

You should consider yourself lucky, because once Detroit's dirty little secret was exposed all Hell would have broke loose.
 
No, they contributed some $900,000 thats it the rest the tax payers pay for

My understanding is Stein had to put money up front. Once the count was over she is sent a bill for the difference.
 
so Donald Trump SUED, to stop the recount? Wow!

WHAT in the world was he so AFRAID of...???

Actually the suit that stopped the count was by the Michigan Attorney General. Recounts in Michigan are for the purpose of giving the second place candidate a chance to win. With only 1% of the state's vote, Stein was not injured in the original vote, thus no standing in asking for a recount. States rights, common sense and the legal process were winners.


They attempted to federalize our elections here by going into federal court ...eventually that judge finally got enough common sense to stop the farse
 
i'm not whining, but TRUMP IS and I'd like to know WHY?

What is he so afraid of....? Why did he sue to stop it?

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER for him to let it go on and SHOW everyone he was without any doubt, the WINNER.
Perhaps on behalf of us Michigan taxpayers who'd be left holding the $3-5 million bag after Jill's circle jerk?
didn't your Secretary of State say it would cost only $978,000 or something like that? Where are you getting your figures from?

No the estimated cost was 4 to 6 million

I thought Stein and the Green party were picking up the tab for this recount bullshit??


No, they contributed some $900,000 thats it the rest the tax payers pay for

That's the biggest bunch of bullshit I have ever heard.

Why should you taxpayers get stuck with the bill?

Those meatheads in the Green party are the ones who wanted that recount so they should be paying for every bit of it.
 
They attempted to federalize our elections here by going into federal court ...eventually that judge finally got enough common sense to stop the farse

Agreed. I have already read on FB liberals rallying to go after electors. Lawless monsters.
 
Perhaps on behalf of us Michigan taxpayers who'd be left holding the $3-5 million bag after Jill's circle jerk?
didn't your Secretary of State say it would cost only $978,000 or something like that? Where are you getting your figures from?

No the estimated cost was 4 to 6 million

I thought Stein and the Green party were picking up the tab for this recount bullshit??


No, they contributed some $900,000 thats it the rest the tax payers pay for

That's the biggest bunch of bullshit I have ever heard.

Why should you taxpayers get stuck with the bill?

Those meatheads in the Green party are the ones who wanted that recount so they should be paying for every bit of it.



Yep, we've got very bad roads, we can put it towards buying new voting machines.... that money could be put to good uses here
 
No, they contributed some $900,000 thats it the rest the tax payers pay for

My understanding is Stein had to put money up front. Once the count was over she is sent a bill for the difference.


Your understanding wrong....the tax payers pay. She payed $970,000 or something

You are right, looks like the legislature is moving to close that loophole.

The will of a socialist imposed upon millions.
 
Hmmm... that works out to about $2 a voter, we can just have a poll tax next federal election....
 
i'm not whining, but TRUMP IS and I'd like to know WHY?

What is he so afraid of....? Why did he sue to stop it?

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER for him to let it go on and SHOW everyone he was without any doubt, the WINNER.

If it makes you feel better, THERE IS NO DOUBT IN MY MIND TRUMP IS THE WINNER.

So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?
 
i'm not whining, but TRUMP IS and I'd like to know WHY?

What is he so afraid of....? Why did he sue to stop it?

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER for him to let it go on and SHOW everyone he was without any doubt, the WINNER.
Perhaps on behalf of us Michigan taxpayers who'd be left holding the $3-5 million bag after Jill's circle jerk?
didn't your Secretary of State say it would cost only $978,000 or something like that? Where are you getting your figures from?

No the estimated cost was 4 to 6 million

I thought Stein and the Green party were picking up the tab for this recount bullshit??
Think it depends on the state. I've read and heard the green weenies had to pay the full bill in WI, but here in MI just the first $790K, with the balance on the back of us taxpayers.
 
So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?

The same laws which allow for recounts, offer the other side legal protections too. In Michigan the suit that stopped the count was entered by the Michigan Attorney General. So...can you coherently accept that?
 
So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?

The same laws which allow for recounts, offer the other side legal protections too. In Michigan the suit that stopped the count was entered by the Michigan Attorney General. So...can you coherently accept that?

What protection was Trump seeking and why? What was threatening him?

You aren't answering.

He was complaining how everything is rigged and now that a review is allowed he is suing for it not to happen.

'Splain that outrageous contradiction please.
 

Forum List

Back
Top