Liberal's support for Partial-Birth Abortion proves they are awful people with no conscience

Blackrook

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2014
21,063
10,587
1,255
What is Partial-Birth Abortion?

Partial-Birth Abortion is a procedure in which the abortionist pulls a living baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth canal (vagina), except for the head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the opening to the womb). The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal tube called a trochar. He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and removes the baby's brain with a powerful suction machine. This causes the skull to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead baby.

What is the Partial-Birth Abortion act?

The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act would ban performance of a partial-birth abortion except if it were necessary to the save a mother's life. The bill defines partial-birth abortion as an abortion in which “the person performing the abortion deliberately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living fetus until, in the case of a head-first presentation, the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother, or, in the case of breech presentation, any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother,” and then kills the baby. The bill would permit use of the procedure if “necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.”

Are Partial-Birth Abortions Common?

According to Ron Fitzsimmons, executive director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers (1997), and other sources, it appears that partial-birth abortions are performed 3,000 to 5,000 times annually. (Even those numbers may be low.) Based on published interviews with numerous abortionists, and interviews with Fitzsimmons in 1997, the “vast majority” of partial-birth abortions are performed in the fifth and sixth months of pregnancy, on healthy babies of healthy mothers.

Why is it called "Partial-Birth"?

Under state laws, a “live birth” occurs when a baby is entirely expelled from the mother and shows any signs of life, however briefly -- regardless of whether the baby is “viable,” i.e., developed enough to be sustained outside the womb with neo-natal medical assistance. Even at 4½ months (20 weeks), perinatologists say that if a baby is expelled or removed completely from the uterus, she will usually gasp for breath and sometimes survive for hours, even though lung development is usually insufficient to permit successful sustained respiration until 23 weeks. Thus, the term “partial-birth” is perfectly descriptive.

http://www.nrlc.org/archive/abortion/facts/pbafacts.html

The fact is, liberals are awful people who stopped developing morally at the age of 12-years-old and never developed a mature sense of the difference between right and wrong. Their support for partial-birth abortion proves that level of moral immaturity.
 
Liberals love killing, abortions, criminals and euthenasia prove it.

1. You're the party of war
2. So you'd rather people that can't afford it to just have the baby??? Better be support welfare!
3. Euthenasia helps people that are hurting end it...If not that...What? Should the family go broke attempting to keep a family member a live that won't live much longer anyways?
 
Oh good, another Christian Taliban thread where they want the government to criminalize being female and poor.
 
Matthew, I will note that your mother did not abort you, and none of the people on this forum who support abortion would support abortion for themselves.
 
Are you as a republican willing to maintain welfare, food stamps and public schools for the child?

You whine about how awful it is not to have the baby but than want to make life hell for the child after it is born.
Why don't you go ask some of those poor children "going through hell" if they wish they were dead to save them from the "suffering?"
 
The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 (Pub.L. 108–105, 117 Stat. 1201, enacted November 5, 2003, 18 U.S.C. § 1531,[1] PBA Ban) is a United States law prohibiting a form of late-term abortioncalled partial-birth abortion, referred to in some medical literature by its less common name of intact dilation and extraction.[2] Under this law, "Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both." The law was enacted in 2003, and in 2007 its constitutionality was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart.
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act - Wikipedia
 
Oh good, another Christian Taliban thread where they want the government to criminalize being female and poor.
So your solution to being female and poor is to give her an abortion?

Maybe you're not aware that abortion can cause severe psychological trauma to women.

Abortion Risks: A list of major psychological complications related to abortion | After Abortion

Of course, you are a liberal and don't care about this.

Because, as I said in the other thread, liberals are awful people who don't know the difference between right and wrong.
 
They're only against government when it comes to helping people...They'll go out of their fucking way to make life harder on the poor.

It is like a game to them. Sick people.
Matthew, just out of idle curiosity, what is your IQ?

The reason I ask is that you consistently come off as one of the least intelligent members of this forum.

And yet you have an interest in science, which is unusual for unintelligent people.
 
Are you as a republican willing to maintain welfare, food stamps and public schools for the child?

You whine about how awful it is not to have the baby but than want to make life hell for the child after it is born.
Why don't you go ask some of those poor children "going through hell" if they wish they were dead to save them from the "suffering?"

Why won't you stop fighting against their welfare so they can have a basic meal on the table.
 
Liberals love killing, abortions, criminals and euthenasia prove it.

1. You're the party of war

Which is why we were at war through the entirety of the Obama administration, instead of putting a winning end to it.

2. So you'd rather people that can't afford it to just have the baby??? Better be support welfare!

How about keep them sterile until they can afford a kid?

3. Euthenasia helps people that are hurting end it...If not that...What? Should the family go broke attempting to keep a family member a live that won't live much longer anyways?

So long as kept strictly voluntary, I have no problem with this. No horrible, painful, protracted and hopeless disease confers any nobility on the victim who sticks it out.
 
Are you as a republican willing to maintain welfare, food stamps and public schools for the child?

You whine about how awful it is not to have the baby but than want to make life hell for the child after it is born.
Why don't you go ask some of those poor children "going through hell" if they wish they were dead to save them from the "suffering?"

Why won't you stop fighting against their welfare so they can have a basic meal on the table.

You could have answered my question first since you think it is such a horror for a poor baby to be born.

We are not against welfare. We are against certain entitements such as able bodied men on welfare. If they can work, then they can work for their welfare payments too.
 
Not one of the men who advocated slavery for black people thought slavery would be right for themselves. But they were awful people who didn't know the difference between right and wrong.

Just like modern-day liberals, who advocate for abortion, but would not want to be themselves aborted.
 
Not one of the men who advocated slavery for black people thought slavery would be right for themselves. But they were awful people who didn't know the difference between right and wrong.

Just like modern-day liberals, who advocate for abortion, but would not want to be themselves aborted.
You have yet to prove only liberals have or support abortion..
 
Partial birth abortions are against the law and the procedure you described is against the law also, upheld by the judicial system...
 
Oh good, another Christian Taliban thread where they want the government to criminalize being female and poor.

You can be female and poor all you like. Just stop stealing from me to support your kids, or to pay the fees for you to kill them.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top