Michigan recount over; Pennsylvania sets hearing

[saveliberty]

So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?

The same laws which allow for recounts, offer the other side legal protections too. In Michigan the suit that stopped the count was entered by the Michigan Attorney General. So...can you coherently accept that?

What protection was Trump seeking and why? What was threatening him?

You aren't answering.

1. Suit was brought by a party who was not injured. Stein only received 1% of the vote here.

2. Federal court broke states rights by demanding the recount before Michigan law allowed.

3. No evidence of fraud or errors was presented in making the case for a recount.

In short, it was a baseless request. The judge agreed.

 

[Fang]

so Donald Trump SUED, to stop the recount? Wow!

WHAT in the world was he so AFRAID of...???

Liberals cheating. Like you had to ask?

 

[saveliberty]

So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?

The same laws which allow for recounts, offer the other side legal protections too. In Michigan the suit that stopped the count was entered by the Michigan Attorney General. So...can you coherently accept that?

What protection was Trump seeking and why? What was threatening him?

You aren't answering.

He was complaining how everything is rigged and now that a review is allowed he is suing for it not to happen.

'Splain that outrageous contradiction please.

You left out the part where he said he would accept the election results just before the election. Hillary said the same thing, then she changed her mind. Pretty contradictory huh? The short answer is you are butt hurt,

 

[Avatar4321]

Like I said earlier, she will lose any lawsuit on standing issues

 

[American_Jihad]

Jill Einstein is becoming another John Kerry, guess she will get yoko ono to sing for her in France next week

...

 

[AntonToo]

So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?

The same laws which allow for recounts, offer the other side legal protections too. In Michigan the suit that stopped the count was entered by the Michigan Attorney General. So...can you coherently accept that?

What protection was Trump seeking and why? What was threatening him?

You aren't answering.

1. Suit was brought by a party who was not injured. Stein only received 1% of the vote here.

2. Federal court broke states rights by demanding the recount before Michigan law allowed.

3. No evidence of fraud or errors was presented in making the case for a recount.

In short, it was a baseless request. The judge agreed.

Judge agreed, after Trump sued.

You aren't answering WHY Trump did this instead of letting the recount go ahead.

WHY doesn't Trump want a recount and a review after aaaalllll this incendiary, democracy undermining rhetoric about how our election system is rigged?

I have an answer - he is a fucking windbag willing to shamelessly lie and cross any line or convention of decency. His claims were nothing but pissing gasoline on his supporters inflamed zeal. He didn't give a shit what it does to this democracy and institutions that support it, he just wanted his base fired up by whatever lies necessary.

 

[Derelict_Drvr]

So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?

The same laws which allow for recounts, offer the other side legal protections too. In Michigan the suit that stopped the count was entered by the Michigan Attorney General. So...can you coherently accept that?

What protection was Trump seeking and why? What was threatening him?

You aren't answering.

1. Suit was brought by a party who was not injured. Stein only received 1% of the vote here.

2. Federal court broke states rights by demanding the recount before Michigan law allowed.

3. No evidence of fraud or errors was presented in making the case for a recount.

In short, it was a baseless request. The judge agreed.

Judge agreed, after Trump sued.

You aren't answering WHY Trump did this instead of letting the recount go ahead.

WHY doesn't Trump want a recount and a review after aaaalllll this incendiary, democracy undermining rhetoric about how our election system is rigged?

I have an answer - he is a fucking windbag willing to shamelessly lie and cross any line or convention of decency. His claims were nothing but pissing gasoline on his supporters inflamed zeal. He didn't give a shit what it does to this democracy and institutions that support it, he just wanted his base fired up by whatever lies necessary.

Your not hearing!

"Washington (CNN)Michigan's attorney general announced Friday (Dec 2nd) he would file suit to stop a recount requested by Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein.

"Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request," Bill Schuette, a Republican, wrote on Twitter."

Michigan attorney general files lawsuit to stop recount - CNNPolitics.com

You're doing what Liberals do. When facts don't match what it is they believe, they ask the same question in different ways trying to get an answer that meets their approval. When that doesn't work they protest, trying to change reality. Both makes them annoying, juvenile, and proves they're world class butt hurt.

 

[BluesLegend]

so Donald Trump SUED, to stop the recount? Wow!

WHAT in the world was he so AFRAID of...???

No, the liberal judge,realized all the democrat voter fraud was being exposed and panicked.....

The petty vindictive recount only hurts Democrats what the hell are they thinking?

 

[AntonToo]

So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?

The same laws which allow for recounts, offer the other side legal protections too. In Michigan the suit that stopped the count was entered by the Michigan Attorney General. So...can you coherently accept that?

What protection was Trump seeking and why? What was threatening him?

You aren't answering.

1. Suit was brought by a party who was not injured. Stein only received 1% of the vote here.

2. Federal court broke states rights by demanding the recount before Michigan law allowed.

3. No evidence of fraud or errors was presented in making the case for a recount.

In short, it was a baseless request. The judge agreed.

Judge agreed, after Trump sued.

You aren't answering WHY Trump did this instead of letting the recount go ahead.

WHY doesn't Trump want a recount and a review after aaaalllll this incendiary, democracy undermining rhetoric about how our election system is rigged?

I have an answer - he is a fucking windbag willing to shamelessly lie and cross any line or convention of decency. His claims were nothing but pissing gasoline on his supporters inflamed zeal. He didn't give a shit what it does to this democracy and institutions that support it, he just wanted his base fired up by whatever lies necessary.

Your not hearing!

"Washington (CNN)Michigan's attorney general announced Friday (Dec 2nd) he would file suit to stop a recount requested by Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein.

"Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request," Bill Schuette, a Republican, wrote on Twitter."

Michigan attorney general files lawsuit to stop recount - CNNPolitics.com

You're doing what Liberals do. When facts don't match what it is they believe, they ask the same question in different ways trying to get an answer that meets their approval. When that doesn't work they protest, trying to change reality. Both makes them annoying, juvenile, and proves they're world class butt hurt.

Donald Trump Sues to Stop Recount in Michigan
http://theslot.jezebel.com/donald-trump-sues-to-stop-recount-in-michigan-1789622874


Lawyers for the Trump campaign argue that Green Party candidate Jill Stein can't seek the recount in Michigan because she wasn't "aggrieved" to the point where potential miscounting of votes could have cost her the election.

The Latest: Stein Urges Federal Judge to Get Recount Moving

Please tell me again that actually believe Trump's prior DAILY AND EXTENSIVE claims of rigged system and refusals to concede election in case of a loss, given that now he is CLEARLY not interested in any voting reviews.

Tell me that you seriously don't believe that those claims were just means to ends for him.

 

[saveliberty]

Judge agreed, after Trump sued.

You aren't answering WHY Trump did this instead of letting the recount go ahead.

WHY doesn't Trump want a recount and a review after aaaalllll this incendiary, democracy undermining rhetoric about how our election system is rigged?

I have an answer - he is a fucking windbag willing to shamelessly lie and cross any line or convention of decency. His claims were nothing but pissing gasoline on his supporters inflamed zeal. He didn't give a shit what it does to this democracy and institutions that support it, he just wanted his base fired up by whatever lies necessary.

Trump won moron.

Michigan attorney general files lawsuit to stop recount - CNNPolitics.com

This article from CNN of all places, NEVER mentions Trump dumbass.

Stein is the one calling it rigged idiot.

 

[AntonToo]

Judge agreed, after Trump sued.

You aren't answering WHY Trump did this instead of letting the recount go ahead.

WHY doesn't Trump want a recount and a review after aaaalllll this incendiary, democracy undermining rhetoric about how our election system is rigged?

I have an answer - he is a fucking windbag willing to shamelessly lie and cross any line or convention of decency. His claims were nothing but pissing gasoline on his supporters inflamed zeal. He didn't give a shit what it does to this democracy and institutions that support it, he just wanted his base fired up by whatever lies necessary.

Trump won moron.

Michigan attorney general files lawsuit to stop recount - CNNPolitics.com

This article from CNN of all places, NEVER mentions Trump dumbass.

Stein is the one calling it rigged idiot.

lol I love how people say moronic things while claiming someone else to be a moron.

 

[saveliberty]

lol I love how people say moronic things while claiming someone else to be a moron.

It was all true, so moron, write us a book of moronic tales.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

so Donald Trump SUED, to stop the recount? Wow!

WHAT in the world was he so AFRAID of...???

Actually it was our AG.

The bitch had no standing. She got about 1% of the vote and she provided ZERO proof of any reason to stick the Michigan taxpayer for $5,000,000.

We're happy its over. You guys just gotta accept that your idiotology has been rejected.

 

[saveliberty]

You won the lottery, the state has confirmed your winning ticket, all the required papers are signed, check written and handed over to you. What person then asks the state to check the numbers again? I mean other than Stein.

 

[saveliberty]

so Donald Trump SUED, to stop the recount? Wow!

WHAT in the world was he so AFRAID of...???

Actually it was our AG.

The bitch had no standing. She got about 1% of the vote and she provided ZERO proof of any reason to stick the Michigan taxpayer for $5,000,000.

We're happy its over. You guys just gotta accept that your idiotology has been rejected.

I actually posted several times last week that Stein had no standing. It appears only some liberals were confused about that.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

so Donald Trump SUED, to stop the recount? Wow!

WHAT in the world was he so AFRAID of...???

Actually it was our AG.

The bitch had no standing. She got about 1% of the vote and she provided ZERO proof of any reason to stick the Michigan taxpayer for $5,000,000.

We're happy its over. You guys just gotta accept that your idiotology has been rejected.

I actually posted several times last week that Stein had no standing. It appears only some liberals were confused about that.

Common sense wins out. Hope it becomes a trend

 

[saveliberty]

Common sense wins out. Hope it becomes a trend

The winners were Michigan voters, common sense, the legal system and states rights. Its like the left wants a civil war. Lawless haters.

 

[American_Jihad]

As Predicted, Jill Stein is Going for the Cash
December 13, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

Poor, naive progressives really thought that Jill Stein was going to prove that Hillary won. The only winner here is Jill Stein.

On Dec 1, I wrote that, "At the end of this scam, Stein has to have a compelling pitch in place to redesignate the funds."

Because while Jill Stein can't just keep all the money she raised, she can ask her donors if they want it back or if the cash can be redesignated elsewhere. Now, after the scam has just about ended, Jill is preparing her pitch.

With her three-state recount effort effectively over, Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein on Tuesday announced her plans for what’s next: to ask donors which organizations should receive the campaign’s leftover money.

First, a look at where some of the money went...

...


Under FEC law, money raised into a recount account can only be used for recount-related expenses -- and a campaign must reach out to donors to either refund their excess donations or ask them whether the funds can be used for another purpose. Based on Tuesday’s announcement, it sounds like Stein’s campaign is looking to go the route of repurposing the funds.

Of course it is. And mentions of the refund will be buried at the bottom while the donors will be hit with the big money pitch.

As Predicted, Jill Stein is Going for the Cash

 

[Muhammed]

i'm not whining, but TRUMP IS and I'd like to know WHY?

What is he so afraid of....? Why did he sue to stop it?

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER for him to let it go on and SHOW everyone he was without any doubt, the WINNER.

You know damn well that he's the winner, despite obvious efforts by the DNC to stuff the ballot box with illegal votes. When the DNC tour bus was in Georgia and literally dumped a load of shit on the fucking road while they were in a hurry trying to get out the early Latino (illegal alien) vote.

 

[Muhammed]

Jill Einstein is becoming another John Kerry, guess she will get yoko ono to sing for her in France next week

...

She's got a very strong voice for someone pushing 80.