Merry Christmas! North Pole Forecast To Be 50 Degrees Warmer Than Normal This Week

[CrusaderFrank]

Maybe change the title from "North Pole 50 degrees warmer" to "one buoy will read 32F for a few hours"

 

[Billy_Bob]

Svalbard to 90 miles south of the North Pole. And 148,000 sq. km. of melted ice. LOL And all you can do is make a comment like that? Truly down to one brain cell.

The graph your using is "SEA ICE 15% or Greater coverage".. Which means that most of the area you so worried about is broken up ice with almost no coverage. And you cant grasp that simple concept..

Sea Ice area coverage of 30% or greater is at the 30 year average. so your hype is total bull shit..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Well look here... back to the 2 Std range.... (of the last thirty years)

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

 

[ding]

View attachment 104776
Well look here... back to the 2 Std range.... (of the last thirty years)

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

Crisis averted, lol.

 

[Crick]

Hardly

 

[SSDD]

Hardly

The stupidity just never stops with you...does it...You dodged this the last time I asked...show us what a coward you are and dodge again...alright?

Once again...this graph is from an ice core taken above the Arctic Circle....take a good look.

Compare the present temperature in that region to the temperatures of the past 10,000 years...now if you have even the slightest ability to read a graph, you should be able to draw a rational conclusion as to what the state of the ice in the Arctic is now, relative to the past 10,000 years.

So tell us skid mark....looking at the graph above...which is the gold standard for temperatures in the northern hemisphere, how do you think the Arctic ice today would compare to most of the past 10,000 years?

Now feel free to run away with your tail tucked firmly between your legs...or stay and A) demonstrate that you really can't make heads nor tails of a graph or B) acknowledge that the extent of Arctic ice today is greater than it has been for most of the past 10,000 years.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Hardly

LOL

The major portion of your graph is within 2std... because that is how long of a record we have. You really are a moron..

 

[SSDD]

Hardly

LOL

The major portion of your graph is within 2std... because that is how long of a record we have. You really are a moron..

What gets me is how the wackos only want to look at a very short window of time...what the hell difference does the period from 1970 to present make if it is still cooler there than it has been for the past 10,000 years...and where are the historical disasters and extinctions that they claim will result from melting since it clearly has melted much more in the past 10k years than anything we have seen?

 

[Crick]

The last time the Arctic was ice-free was 2.6 million years ago. Homo Sapiens was over two million years in the future.

Explain how that makes it impossible for human CO2 emissions to be responsible for this warming.

 

[ding]

The last time the Arctic was ice-free was 2.6 million years ago. Homo Sapiens was over two million years in the future.

Explain how that makes it impossible for human CO2 emissions to be responsible for this warming.

I believe that was sarcasm. I believe the phenomenon is called the glacial-interglacial cycle. We are currently in an interglacial cycle. Don't alarm yourself over it. It is perfectly natural.

 

[Crick]

Your desire that your conversants be alarmed is obvious, transparent and pathetic. You alarm no one.

Human civilization - the human species - has never seen an ice free Arctic before. THIS instance is NOT perfectly natural. It is perfectly synthetic.

 

[SSDD]

The last time the Arctic was ice-free was 2.6 million years ago. Homo Sapiens was over two million years in the future.

You sure about that crick?.....you keep dodging this question but it isn't going to go away...AGAIN...here is data taken from an ice core from above the arctic circle...take a look...I know graphs are tough for you, but if you ask, someone will be happy to help.

How do you think the ice in the arctic looks today when compared to the past 10,000 years?...look carefully at the graph...do you think there is more ice in the arctic today than there has been for most of the past 10,000 years, or less ice in the arctic today than there has been for most of the past 10,000 years?

 

[SSDD]

Human civilization - the human species - has never seen an ice free Arctic before. It is NOT perfectly natural. It is perfectly synthetic.

You sure about that crick?....you seem to be worried that the present temperatures are going to result in an ice free arctic...refer again to the graph and look at the present...in the arctic....compared to the past 10,000 years....now again, do you believe the ice extent in the arctic is greater today or less than it has been for most of the past 10,000 years...and if you believe it is less, please square it with the gold standard reconstruction from the ice taken above the arctic circle.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Barrow 27
Kotenly -27
Golomjannyj 1
Alert -20

 

[Old Rocks]

And large portions of Alaska's and Canada's north shore well above normal. Nice cherry picking Comrade Frankie boi.

Arctic Weather Map

 

[SSDD]

And large portions of Alaska's and Canada's north shore well above normal. Nice cherry picking Comrade Frankie boi.

Arctic Weather Map

Actually, those warm portions are quite small if one takes the whole "shoreline" into account...calling them "large" is either alarmist claptrap, or an inability to read a graph approaching crick's level of incompetence.

 

[Old Rocks]

SSDD, you are looking at the current temperatures. Look at the date on the map. That is what is frustrating about you deniers, you don't bother to read anything. You just take a glance and make assumptions. That map is updated daily.