Global Warming Conspiracy in Tatters as west Antarctica Temperatures Collapse 2 Degrees in 2O years .

[Dagosa]

Then surely you can show us a photo of a land mass sinking due to the "ocean rise" of all this bullshit "melting" that, according to you, has nothing to do with liquid water...

Ha ha, any land mass loser ? Would Florida work ?

 

[Dagosa]

You just claimed "melting" and were BUSTED for NO LIQUID WATER PRESENT.

How can ice be MELTING if it is all STILL FROZEN???

MORON!!!

You just out stupid yourself.
“ how can ice be melting if it’s still frozen “
Well dufus, ice doesn’t suddenly disappear. Dah…there is this fourth definition, called time. Ha ha…what a nit wit you are.

 

[Crick]

Then surely you can show us a photo of a land mass sinking due to the "ocean rise" of all this bullshit "melting" that, according to you, has nothing to do with liquid water...

How much, do you believe, are people like the University of Colorado Sea Level Research Group claiming that the world's oceans have risen since 1993? If you'd like to know, you can just go to their homepage. It's right there: welcome | Sea Level Research Group

Given your oft-repeated demand to see photographs demonstrating sea level rise, I just want to make certain YOU understand for what you're actually asking and whose absence you deem a hard refutation of the whole idea.

I'll save you a trip. Their data show global sea level, with seasonal signals and all known isostasy effects removed, has risen 112 mm since 1993. That's 4.41 inches.

Could you simply respond with something to the effect that you understand sea level is claimed to have risen 4.41 inches (112 mm) since 1993?

 

[EMH]

How much, do you believe, are people like the University of Colorado Sea Level Research Group claiming that the world's oceans have risen since 1993? If you'd like to know, you can just go to their homepage. It's right there: welcome | Sea Level Research Group

Given your oft-repeated demand to see photographs demonstrating sea level rise, I just want to make certain YOU understand for what you're actually asking and whose absence you deem a hard refutation of the whole idea.

I'll save you a trip. Their data show global sea level, with seasonal signals and all known isostasy effects removed, has risen 112 mm since 1993. That's 4.41 inches.

Could you simply respond with something to the effect that you understand sea level is claimed to have risen 4.41 inches (112 mm) since 1993?

To actually have an ocean rise, you need a net ongoing ice melt, and you don't have that, and there has not been ONE SINGLE YEAR where you did...

THAT is WHY you CANNOT SHOW US A PHOTO of something sinking, because NOTHING is sinking since oceans are NOT RISING...

 

[Crick]

To actually have an ocean rise, you need a net ongoing ice melt, and you don't have that, and there has not been ONE SINGLE YEAR where you did...

THAT is WHY you CANNOT SHOW US A PHOTO of something sinking, because NOTHING is sinking since oceans are NOT RISING...

I was just hoping you could state that you understand the University of Colorado Sea Level Research Group is claiming that sea level rise since 1993 has been 4.41 inches (112 mm). Could you possibly do that for me?

 

[EMH]

I was just hoping you could state that you understand the University of Colorado Sea Level Research Group is claiming that sea level rise since 1993 has been 4.41 inches (112 mm). Could you possibly do that for me?

Your side claims:

1. atmospheric temp rise = completely fudged BS, documented here over and over
2. ocean temp rise = complete bullshit, outed as bullshit by lack of any cane breakout
3. ocean rise = no real evidence, nothing is sinking because oceans are not rising
4. net ice melt = laughable since 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica has grown every year

What your side has is URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT which your side misdiagnoses as "warming" caused by Co2.

So, who TF cares what another taxpayer funded fudge "study" claims.

Your side has NOTHING.

 

[Crick]

Your side claims:

1. atmospheric temp rise = completely fudged BS, documented here over and over
2. ocean temp rise = complete bullshit, outed as bullshit by lack of any cane breakout
3. ocean rise = no real evidence, nothing is sinking because oceans are not rising
4. net ice melt = laughable since 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica has grown every year

What your side has is URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT which your side misdiagnoses as "warming" caused by Co2.

So, who TF cares what another taxpayer funded fudge "study" claims.

Your side has NOTHING.

We should both care because you are claiming that the lack of photographs showing sea level rise is proof that none is taking place. I would just like to start a discussion on this point with some common understandings as to what we're arguing about. Is there some reason you would choose not to comply? What is the harm in your agreeing that the UCSLRG web site says what the UCSLRG web site says?

 

[EMH]

We should both care because you are claiming that the lack of photographs showing sea level rise is proof that none is taking place

And WHY can't your side SHOW US A PHOTO??

You claim ocean rise. Why can't WE SEE IT???

What is the harm in your agreeing that the UCSLRG web site says what the UCSLRG web site says?

LOL!!!

The BiBULL says stars are the size of figs. Does that make it true???

 

[otto105]

Much more important than you might well appreciate .
The Warming theory had to be abandoned as its stupidities were exposed.
Deep State / UN / IPPC rebranded the conspiracy as Climate Change .
Even more absurd, just on a common sense scientific basis -- almost all enery comes from the sun , not from us .
Now you will see the evil Deep Staters move to brand the imaginary Climate crisis as a Health Threat to mankind .

In a paper published by the American Meteorological Society, a group of international scientists note the “statistically significant” rate of temperature decline with the strongest cooling occurring in spring. During this season, the temperature fell by a massive 1.84°C every decade between 1999-2018. In the winter, the decadal fall was 1.19°C. The cooling was measured by a number of databases, while an accurate consistent record was collected from the Marie Byrd weather station.


Almost needless to say, none of this cooling was forecast by climate models. The authors suggest that models are an “important tool” in making future projections of future climate changes over Antarctica. But they admit that the models did not pick up the recent significant cooling in West Antarctica. There is said to be “no robust agreement” among the models on the important sea temperatures driving the western Antarctica air temperatures. Tropical Pacific climate oscillation is still an important source of uncertainty in future projections of West Antarctica air temperatures, it is observed.

Was it ever thus? Forty years of hopelessly inaccurate temperature forecasts, along with unrealistic climate ‘tipping’ impacts driven by ridiculous suggestions that the temperature will rise by 4°C in less than 80 years, is hardly a record that inspires confidence. The recent appearance of clickbait attributions trying to pin individual weather events on human activities is little more than a scientific joke. These politicised attempts to measure the unmeasurable are a complete waste of time and money, the uncharitable might note. Not least because the models are corrupted by the notion promoted by the UN’s IPCC that all or most global warming since 1900 is caused by humans burning fossil fuel. This might seem an increasingly implausible suggestion in the light of much science including this latest paper on the recent dramatic drop in Antarctica temperatures.


Of course, the 2023 low sea ice story has moved on. In mainstream media it would be considered very bad form to note that according to the latest figures from the NSIDC, the start of summer in October saw below-trend ice melt – 903,000 square kilometres compared with the average of 985,000 sq kms. Up in the Arctic, pickings have been thin for some years following the small cyclical recovery in sea ice that set in around 2014. As the winter takes hold, the NSIDC reports that the ice has increased “at a faster than average pace”. The freeze is said to have been particularly rapid along the Siberian seas where the ice cover expanded to the coast by the end of last month. Things are not look good for Sir David Attenborough’s claim in last year’s Frozen Planet II that summer sea ice could all be gone in 12 years. Over at the Greenland ice sheet, the latest information from the Danish Polar Portal shows winter ice growing back faster than the 1981-2010 average.

Source

An unsourced blog post proves what.

Explain

 

[Crick]

And WHY can't your side SHOW US A PHOTO??
You claim ocean rise. Why can't WE SEE IT???
LOL!!!
The BiBULL says stars are the size of figs. Does that make it true???

Do you accept that the University of Colorado Sea Level Research Group shows that sea level has risen 4.41 inches (112 mm) since 1993? This is a yes or no question Eb.

Just click this link and read the graph. Come back and type a yes or a no.

welcome | Sea Level Research Group

sealevel.colorado.edu

 

[EMH]

Do you accept that the University of Colorado Sea Level Research Group shows that sea level has risen 4.41 inches (112 mm) since 1993? This is a yes or no question Eb.

They don't SHOW anything but FUDGE

FUDGE....


THAT IS NOT BACKED UP BY THE REAL PLANET EARTH TODAY....

If oceans are rising WHY CAN'T YOU SHOW US THINGS THAT ARE SINKING???


Because your side is LYING as usual...

 

[Crick]

They don't SHOW anything but FUDGE
FUDGE....
THAT IS NOT BACKED UP BY THE REAL PLANET EARTH TODAY....
If oceans are rising WHY CAN'T YOU SHOW US THINGS THAT ARE SINKING???
Because your side is LYING as usual...

At this point in time, I don't care that you reject what they are saying. I simply want you to concur that THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE SAYING.

Why are you putting up so much resistance Eb?

 

[Dagosa]

Then surely you can show us a photo of a land mass sinking due to the "ocean rise" of all this bullshit "melting" that, according to you, has nothing to do with liquid water...

You are really silly…you’re into this, show me a picture because you have no other legitimate argument for doubting what every climate science institute in the world can tell you. Just ask….

 

[EMH]

At this point in time, I don't care that you reject what they are saying. I simply want you to concur that THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE SAYING.

Why are you putting up so much resistance Eb?

So just SAYING THINGS NOT TRUE is "the science" now.... GOT IT.

 

[EMH]

You are really silly…you’re into this, show me a picture because you have no other legitimate argument for doubting what every climate science institute in the world can tell you. Just ask….

PARROTING is greater than REALITY, so sayeth the biggest moron in Environment section....

REALITY = NO OCEAN RISE = NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT = EARTH NOT WARMING

 

[Dagosa]

PARROTING is greater than REALITY, so sayeth the biggest moron in Environment section....

REALITY = NO OCEAN RISE = NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT = EARTH NOT WARMING

Bubba, you’re still around. I though you sneezed and blew your brains out.

 

[EMH]

Bubba, you’re still around. I though you sneezed and blew your brains out.

Nope, still here, and your side still

cannot explain the ice on Alaska vs Greenland
cannot explain why one polar circle has 9+ times the ice of the other
cannot produce one single photo of an land mass sinking
cannot document a breakout in canes because the record decade for canes is still the 1940s
cannot explain how Co2 caused Greenland to freeze while North America thawed

 

[Dagosa]

PARROTING is greater than REALITY, so sayeth the biggest moron in Environment section....

REALITY = NO OCEAN RISE = NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT = EARTH NOT WARMING

Nope, still here, and your side still

cannot explain the ice on Alaska vs Greenland
cannot explain why one polar circle has 9+ times the ice of the other
cannot produce one single photo of an land mass sinking
cannot document a breakout in canes because the record decade for canes is still the 1940s
cannot explain how Co2 caused Greenland to freeze while North America thawed

Snow ice dufus. It snows, it turns to ice. The land mass doesn’t sink stupid, the water level rises. You’re hilarious. Drink too much industrial cleaner ?

 

[Dagosa]

cannot explain how Co2 caused Greenland to freeze while North America thawed

Ah yes I can, easily.