Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He calls it a farm. I saw a wasteland of hot dry dirt. But none the less, yes he owns property on the border. He and none of the surrounding property owners like him are the slightest bit amenable to a POTUS fence in their backyard. Eminent Domain.Yes Mam.My Uncle owns a farm in Texas. He and his neighbors are not amenable to notin. And rightly so.me being a Texan, Conservatives rule the state .. you want to piss off Texans try and take their private property. The biggest ranch I've ever been on was 26 square miles. The owner has been touted in Texas Parks and Wildlife monthly magazine for his ranch stewardship, and has a lot of pride and time invested in his pristine dirt. He will have who ever trys to move 1 single fence post of his in court longer that their grandchildren will be alive.
Okay, yes, but consider those particular Texans are RIGHT on the border and are probably seeing illegals cross on the daily. So they might be a little more amenable to having a border wall built IF the gov't offers them a fair deal.
On the Mexican border then?
Right on the border is his farm, then.
Uh-huh
He calls it a farm. I saw a wasteland of hot dry dirt. But none the less, yes he owns property on the border. He and none of the surrounding property owners like him are the slightest bit amenable to a POTUS fence in their backyard. Eminent Domain.Yes Mam.My Uncle owns a farm in Texas. He and his neighbors are not amenable to notin. And rightly so.Okay, yes, but consider those particular Texans are RIGHT on the border and are probably seeing illegals cross on the daily. So they might be a little more amenable to having a border wall built IF the gov't offers them a fair deal.
On the Mexican border then?
Right on the border is his farm, then.
Uh-huh
I fail to understand why you question my honesty. As for illegals crossing into his property, I don't know . He hasn't talked about that.He calls it a farm. I saw a wasteland of hot dry dirt. But none the less, yes he owns property on the border. He and none of the surrounding property owners like him are the slightest bit amenable to a POTUS fence in their backyard. Eminent Domain.Yes Mam.My Uncle owns a farm in Texas. He and his neighbors are not amenable to notin. And rightly so.
On the Mexican border then?
Right on the border is his farm, then.
Uh-huh
How many illegals does he see cross there? Let's see how honest you really are.
The Democrats have recently been making the private property argument.One of the objections by Democrats over Comrade Trump's border wall is that it would have to cross private property and pristine landscapes.
Gosh, I hope we never need a two thousand mile long transcontinental railroad!
And we'd be totally screwed if we ever needed to build 46,876 miles of interstate highways!
Oh, wait...
To be fair, I have never heard anybody argue against the wall because it would be crossing pristine landscape, but then again, I really am not sure why they are opposed to it. Except for the fact that Trump wants it, so they don’t.
And as it turns out, one of our forum members has been parroting this new party line right here on this forum: Trump + GOP forcibly taking Americans land .
Crossing pristine landscape: The enormous and irreparable impact Trump's wall will have on wildlife
More: Perspective | I voted for Trump. Now his wall may destroy my butterfly paradise.
Don’t Mess With Texas Landowners on Border Wall, Lawmakers Warn
One section of Trump's US-Mexico border wall could prompt 'decades of court cases' from private landowners
Honestly, I feel those “private and pristine land” arguments are not about protecting land. If that was their issue, it would have been stated months ago.
It was stated years ago.
He calls it a farm. I saw a wasteland of hot dry dirt. But none the less, yes he owns property on the border. He and none of the surrounding property owners like him are the slightest bit amenable to a POTUS fence in their backyard. Eminent Domain.Yes Mam.My Uncle owns a farm in Texas. He and his neighbors are not amenable to notin. And rightly so.Okay, yes, but consider those particular Texans are RIGHT on the border and are probably seeing illegals cross on the daily. So they might be a little more amenable to having a border wall built IF the gov't offers them a fair deal.
On the Mexican border then?
Right on the border is his farm, then.
Uh-huh
You're nuts, Dude.The Democrats have recently been making the private property argument.One of the objections by Democrats over Comrade Trump's border wall is that it would have to cross private property and pristine landscapes.
Gosh, I hope we never need a two thousand mile long transcontinental railroad!
And we'd be totally screwed if we ever needed to build 46,876 miles of interstate highways!
Oh, wait...
To be fair, I have never heard anybody argue against the wall because it would be crossing pristine landscape, but then again, I really am not sure why they are opposed to it. Except for the fact that Trump wants it, so they don’t.
And as it turns out, one of our forum members has been parroting this new party line right here on this forum: Trump + GOP forcibly taking Americans land .
Crossing pristine landscape: The enormous and irreparable impact Trump's wall will have on wildlife
More: Perspective | I voted for Trump. Now his wall may destroy my butterfly paradise.
Don’t Mess With Texas Landowners on Border Wall, Lawmakers Warn
One section of Trump's US-Mexico border wall could prompt 'decades of court cases' from private landowners
Honestly, I feel those “private and pristine land” arguments are not about protecting land. If that was their issue, it would have been stated months ago.
It was stated years ago.
The point is, that is not why most liberals don’t want the wall built. It’s a smoke screen. The progressive faction of the democrats wants illegals here. That’s the point.
Eminent Domain is supposed to pay fair market value.He calls it a farm. I saw a wasteland of hot dry dirt. But none the less, yes he owns property on the border. He and none of the surrounding property owners like him are the slightest bit amenable to a POTUS fence in their backyard. Eminent Domain.Yes Mam.My Uncle owns a farm in Texas. He and his neighbors are not amenable to notin. And rightly so.
On the Mexican border then?
Right on the border is his farm, then.
Uh-huh
Eminent Domain has screwed me and he is going to get screwed. Eminent Domain pays fair market value even if you don't want to sell.
You're nuts, Dude.The Democrats have recently been making the private property argument.To be fair, I have never heard anybody argue against the wall because it would be crossing pristine landscape, but then again, I really am not sure why they are opposed to it. Except for the fact that Trump wants it, so they don’t.
And as it turns out, one of our forum members has been parroting this new party line right here on this forum: Trump + GOP forcibly taking Americans land .
Crossing pristine landscape: The enormous and irreparable impact Trump's wall will have on wildlife
More: Perspective | I voted for Trump. Now his wall may destroy my butterfly paradise.
Don’t Mess With Texas Landowners on Border Wall, Lawmakers Warn
One section of Trump's US-Mexico border wall could prompt 'decades of court cases' from private landowners
Honestly, I feel those “private and pristine land” arguments are not about protecting land. If that was their issue, it would have been stated months ago.
It was stated years ago.
The point is, that is not why most liberals don’t want the wall built. It’s a smoke screen. The progressive faction of the democrats wants illegals here. That’s the point.
"The progressive faction of the democrats wants illegals here. That’s the point. "
Bull Fucking Shit. Who the fuck ever said that?
You're nuts, Dude.The Democrats have recently been making the private property argument.To be fair, I have never heard anybody argue against the wall because it would be crossing pristine landscape, but then again, I really am not sure why they are opposed to it. Except for the fact that Trump wants it, so they don’t.
And as it turns out, one of our forum members has been parroting this new party line right here on this forum: Trump + GOP forcibly taking Americans land .
Crossing pristine landscape: The enormous and irreparable impact Trump's wall will have on wildlife
More: Perspective | I voted for Trump. Now his wall may destroy my butterfly paradise.
Don’t Mess With Texas Landowners on Border Wall, Lawmakers Warn
One section of Trump's US-Mexico border wall could prompt 'decades of court cases' from private landowners
Honestly, I feel those “private and pristine land” arguments are not about protecting land. If that was their issue, it would have been stated months ago.
It was stated years ago.
The point is, that is not why most liberals don’t want the wall built. It’s a smoke screen. The progressive faction of the democrats wants illegals here. That’s the point.
"The progressive faction of the democrats wants illegals here. That’s the point. "
Bull Fucking Shit. Who the fuck ever said that?
Eminent Domain is supposed to pay fair market value.He calls it a farm. I saw a wasteland of hot dry dirt. But none the less, yes he owns property on the border. He and none of the surrounding property owners like him are the slightest bit amenable to a POTUS fence in their backyard. Eminent Domain.Yes Mam.On the Mexican border then?
Right on the border is his farm, then.
Uh-huh
Eminent Domain has screwed me and he is going to get screwed. Eminent Domain pays fair market value even if you don't want to sell.
See Sue. Think Visas. Skip all the nasty snarky Wall BS.You're nuts, Dude.The Democrats have recently been making the private property argument.
And as it turns out, one of our forum members has been parroting this new party line right here on this forum: Trump + GOP forcibly taking Americans land .
Crossing pristine landscape: The enormous and irreparable impact Trump's wall will have on wildlife
More: Perspective | I voted for Trump. Now his wall may destroy my butterfly paradise.
Don’t Mess With Texas Landowners on Border Wall, Lawmakers Warn
One section of Trump's US-Mexico border wall could prompt 'decades of court cases' from private landowners
Honestly, I feel those “private and pristine land” arguments are not about protecting land. If that was their issue, it would have been stated months ago.
It was stated years ago.
The point is, that is not why most liberals don’t want the wall built. It’s a smoke screen. The progressive faction of the democrats wants illegals here. That’s the point.
"The progressive faction of the democrats wants illegals here. That’s the point. "
Bull Fucking Shit. Who the fuck ever said that?
Nancy Pelosi, for one. The wall is immoral. The wall is "not who we are".
One of the objections by Democrats over Comrade Trump's border wall is that it would have to cross private property and pristine landscapes.
Gosh, I hope we never need a two thousand mile long transcontinental railroad!
And we'd be totally screwed if we ever needed to build 46,876 miles of interstate highways!
Oh, wait...
This fails as a false comparison fallacy.One of the objections by Democrats over Comrade Trump's border wall is that it would have to cross private property and pristine landscapes.
Gosh, I hope we never need a two thousand mile long transcontinental railroad!
And we'd be totally screwed if we ever needed to build 46,876 miles of interstate highways!
Oh, wait...
But Trump said yesterday they don't have to wait for the courts -- they can take the land and build on it before the court case is settled. Was he wrong?Private property rights have never been of concern to Democrats. After all, they spend so much time trying to prove rich people don't deserve their money and that it is okay to take it from them.I was under the impression all the rights of way had been cleared, since the Clinton era bill that was never funded.One of the objections by Democrats over Comrade Trump's border wall is that it would have to cross private property and pristine landscapes.
Gosh, I hope we never need a two thousand mile long transcontinental railroad!
And we'd be totally screwed if we ever needed to build 46,876 miles of interstate highways!
Oh, wait...
This latest argument over the wall and property rights is hypocritical and totally illogical.
me being a Texan, Conservatives rule the state .. you want to piss off Texans try and take their private property. The biggest ranch I've ever been on was 26 square miles. The owner has been touted in Texas Parks and Wildlife monthly magazine for his ranch stewardship, and has a lot of pride and time invested in his pristine dirt. He will have who ever trys to move 1 single fence post of his in court longer that their grandchildren will be alive.
Everyone hiring those eleven million illegals wants them here, and don't pretend they are all democrats.The Democrats have recently been making the private property argument.One of the objections by Democrats over Comrade Trump's border wall is that it would have to cross private property and pristine landscapes.
Gosh, I hope we never need a two thousand mile long transcontinental railroad!
And we'd be totally screwed if we ever needed to build 46,876 miles of interstate highways!
Oh, wait...
To be fair, I have never heard anybody argue against the wall because it would be crossing pristine landscape, but then again, I really am not sure why they are opposed to it. Except for the fact that Trump wants it, so they don’t.
And as it turns out, one of our forum members has been parroting this new party line right here on this forum: Trump + GOP forcibly taking Americans land .
Crossing pristine landscape: The enormous and irreparable impact Trump's wall will have on wildlife
More: Perspective | I voted for Trump. Now his wall may destroy my butterfly paradise.
Don’t Mess With Texas Landowners on Border Wall, Lawmakers Warn
One section of Trump's US-Mexico border wall could prompt 'decades of court cases' from private landowners
Honestly, I feel those “private and pristine land” arguments are not about protecting land. If that was their issue, it would have been stated months ago.
It was stated years ago.
The point is, that is not why most liberals don’t want the wall built. It’s a smoke screen. The progressive faction of the democrats wants illegals here. That’s the point.
Maybe it's land that's been in the family a long time. Maybe its land that they have cleared, fenced, tilled, whatever.....for years. Maybe they don't want to move, to lose that land. What if it's not about throwing a check at them? The government won't make such a large offer that it would change the mind of someone in it for the family heritage.Simply pay the landowners.....it is that simple. Same for a pipeline....make the company pay all the landowners.
But it's okay to see more value in one thing than another and think a highway system is worth the cost, but a wall is not. So your post is dumb.One of the objections by Democrats over Comrade Trump's border wall is that it would have to cross private property and pristine landscapes.
Gosh, I hope we never need a two thousand mile long transcontinental railroad!
And we'd be totally screwed if we ever needed to build 46,876 miles of interstate highways!
Oh, wait...
