Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When did America have free markets?If you're going to be president might as well be the best.Perhaps the reason Fonda was never charged with treason or other crime, may be because of the publicity and citizen controversy that it would arouse. not something the Republicans wanted at the time? To get people thinking about that war and the arguments pro and con might have been a loser for them.
So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
MacArthur never said classical liberalism just liberalism. Course he was a government school graduate and a conservative, so knew little. Good thing he wasn't elected president.If you're going to be president might as well be the best.Perhaps the reason Fonda was never charged with treason or other crime, may be because of the publicity and citizen controversy that it would arouse. not something the Republicans wanted at the time? To get people thinking about that war and the arguments pro and con might have been a loser for them.
So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
Actually, Jane was raised as Hollywood royaltyJane Fonda risked her career to end a senseless war
Her efforts, along with other protestors, put pressure on Washington to end a useless war. If allowed to continue unchallenged....the war probably would have gone on another ten years
That she did and it was a worthy cause, yet she crossed the line when she supported the North Vietnamese.
Even in groups such as the S.D.S.. there was a struggle between responsible liberals who wanted to keep the message focused on getting our boys home because they were dying unnecessarily and irresponsible leftist radicals who crossed the same line as Fonda. What Fonda did was to give the impression that all those against the war were sympathizing with the North Vietnamese, which wasn't the case.
Fonda's biggest fault was she could not separate the soldier from the war
She was your typical shallow fashion victim. She has no genuine principles, like most Burb Brats suffering from affluence, and that goes for both left and right wing fashion victims. Nothing is ever real to them, just media moments and they move on, like little birds with no attention spans, to the next Thing of the Moment. She was nothing special, and certainly not in the same league with vermin like Kerry, Hillary, Bill, and Obama by a long shot.
The charge of 'treason' is problematic, since no declaration of war was ever issued, one of my pet peeves over VN, and a huge mistake. Besides, we hardly had any troops left by the end of 1972. I can find far worse than Fonda, when it comes to real treason. She's irrelevant, and still is. She had a couple of good roles, owing to excellent direction and writing, that's about it. People still obsessing over her need to get a fricking life. Seriously.
Parts just fell into her lap because Henry Fonda was her father
Easiest thing would be just to wrap herself in the flag, support the war and let the money flow in. That is what most in Hollywood did
Instead, she risked it all. Fought against an unjustifiable war. Called out the military industrial complex. Helped end a war before it took more lives
Those "dope addled hippie friends" turned out to be right in their assessment of the warActually, Jane was raised as Hollywood royaltyJane Fonda risked her career to end a senseless war
Her efforts, along with other protestors, put pressure on Washington to end a useless war. If allowed to continue unchallenged....the war probably would have gone on another ten years
That she did and it was a worthy cause, yet she crossed the line when she supported the North Vietnamese.
Even in groups such as the S.D.S.. there was a struggle between responsible liberals who wanted to keep the message focused on getting our boys home because they were dying unnecessarily and irresponsible leftist radicals who crossed the same line as Fonda. What Fonda did was to give the impression that all those against the war were sympathizing with the North Vietnamese, which wasn't the case.
Fonda's biggest fault was she could not separate the soldier from the war
She was your typical shallow fashion victim. She has no genuine principles, like most Burb Brats suffering from affluence, and that goes for both left and right wing fashion victims. Nothing is ever real to them, just media moments and they move on, like little birds with no attention spans, to the next Thing of the Moment. She was nothing special, and certainly not in the same league with vermin like Kerry, Hillary, Bill, and Obama by a long shot.
The charge of 'treason' is problematic, since no declaration of war was ever issued, one of my pet peeves over VN, and a huge mistake. Besides, we hardly had any troops left by the end of 1972. I can find far worse than Fonda, when it comes to real treason. She's irrelevant, and still is. She had a couple of good roles, owing to excellent direction and writing, that's about it. People still obsessing over her need to get a fricking life. Seriously.
Parts just fell into her lap because Henry Fonda was her father
Easiest thing would be just to wrap herself in the flag, support the war and let the money flow in. That is what most in Hollywood did
Instead, she risked it all. Fought against an unjustifiable war. Called out the military industrial complex. Helped end a war before it took more lives
lol rubbish, she just went along with her dope addled hippie friends, mostly other Burb Brat rich kids, here peer group. She didn't help anything, she just attention whored for herself, is all. She still does. She never risked anything.
Why did the founders give message board participants the power to decide treason and who is guilty of same? Seems that should be a function of government.Why were we fighting Vietnam people? Why were so many dying? Sometimes treason is the only right thing to do.
Remember how wrong you thought Muhammad Ali’s was?
I respected Ali.
But then, he was not a traitor - Fonda is.
Those "dope addled hippie friends" turned out to be right in their assessment of the warActually, Jane was raised as Hollywood royaltyThat she did and it was a worthy cause, yet she crossed the line when she supported the North Vietnamese.
Even in groups such as the S.D.S.. there was a struggle between responsible liberals who wanted to keep the message focused on getting our boys home because they were dying unnecessarily and irresponsible leftist radicals who crossed the same line as Fonda. What Fonda did was to give the impression that all those against the war were sympathizing with the North Vietnamese, which wasn't the case.
Fonda's biggest fault was she could not separate the soldier from the war
She was your typical shallow fashion victim. She has no genuine principles, like most Burb Brats suffering from affluence, and that goes for both left and right wing fashion victims. Nothing is ever real to them, just media moments and they move on, like little birds with no attention spans, to the next Thing of the Moment. She was nothing special, and certainly not in the same league with vermin like Kerry, Hillary, Bill, and Obama by a long shot.
The charge of 'treason' is problematic, since no declaration of war was ever issued, one of my pet peeves over VN, and a huge mistake. Besides, we hardly had any troops left by the end of 1972. I can find far worse than Fonda, when it comes to real treason. She's irrelevant, and still is. She had a couple of good roles, owing to excellent direction and writing, that's about it. People still obsessing over her need to get a fricking life. Seriously.
Parts just fell into her lap because Henry Fonda was her father
Easiest thing would be just to wrap herself in the flag, support the war and let the money flow in. That is what most in Hollywood did
Instead, she risked it all. Fought against an unjustifiable war. Called out the military industrial complex. Helped end a war before it took more lives
lol rubbish, she just went along with her dope addled hippie friends, mostly other Burb Brat rich kids, here peer group. She didn't help anything, she just attention whored for herself, is all. She still does. She never risked anything.
Why did the founders give message board participants the power to decide treason and who is guilty of same? Seems that should be a function of government.Why were we fighting Vietnam people? Why were so many dying? Sometimes treason is the only right thing to do.
Remember how wrong you thought Muhammad Ali’s was?
I respected Ali.
But then, he was not a traitor - Fonda is.
There is no reconciliation with you Maoists. You are the sworn enemy of the United States. We will utterly defeat you as we did last time you rose up in civil war, or you will defeat us and end this nation once and for all.
You are not the opposition, you are the enemy. You are far more dangerous than Hitler or Mussolini and must be treated as they were.
Those "dope addled hippie friends" turned out to be right in their assessment of the war
I stopped reading after I read your third lie. I wonder how many total lies you told. I’ll never know because I stopped reading that crap you wroteWhy did the founders give message board participants the power to decide treason and who is guilty of same? Seems that should be a function of government.Why were we fighting Vietnam people? Why were so many dying? Sometimes treason is the only right thing to do.
Remember how wrong you thought Muhammad Ali’s was?
I respected Ali.
But then, he was not a traitor - Fonda is.
the Founders didn't, but the history of a Supreme Court making up fake law, and now with assorted judges claiming the power to invalidate state laws passed by voters and making up their own laws based on their personal biases and sexual fetishes, along with political Parties on the faux 'Left' now openly hiring violent street thugs by running ads in papers to disrupt legitimate assemblies, and Democrats now all about supporting assassinations of police officers, it seems it's now pretty much anybody claiming whatever they want to now, just as in the Wiemar Republic.years in Germany. We know how that turned out, so you commies might want to be careful what you wish for. Those street thugs you Burb Brats worship aren't very reliable allies and they won't like being used as fodder just for your personal whims, they will turn around and take you down at the drop of a hat; they want a payday, and with no police to protect your tantrums they will pick over your dead bodies for loot; they just want loot, they don't care about your silly assed pretensions. The stupid hippies in the '60's thought those biker scum were just wonderful and 'on their side', but we know how it went when the dopers thought they had a private 'army' in the scum. Turns out they didn't give two shits about your political fantasies.
Don't worry Hotcakes, you'll be in her shoes someday....Get the tissues ready......
1."'I have so little time left!' Jane Fonda, 76, reveals she can't stop crying as she comes to terms with her own mortality
2. ...admits she has been brought to tears on more than one occasion recently as she comes to terms with her own mortality.
3. In a thoughtful blog post entitled 'Crying', which has since been removed, Jane wrote: '[I've been thinking], how come my tears are so close to the surface? And I’ve come to feel it has to do with age. I have become so wonderfully, terribly aware of time, of how little of it I have left; how much of it is behind me, and everything becomes so precious.'
4. 'I've listed sad things but what startles me even more is how I get emotional about nice things,.....
5. The thrice-married prolific blogger, who has three children, also joked she is becoming so weepy these days that she can 'only wear waterproof mascara from now on'."
Jane Fonda 'keeps crying as she comes to terms with her mortality' | Mail Online
And....in two related stories......
6. "You don’t know America if you don’t know the Jane Fonda cult. Or rather, the anti-Fonda cult. At places where soldiers or former soldiers congregate, there’ll be stickers of her likeness on the urinals;...."
Rick Perlstein reviews ?Jane Fonda?s War? by Mary Hershberger · LRB 17 November 2005
7. One enterprising manufacturer sells urinal cakes with Ms. Fonda's likeness....
jane fonda urinal cakes | eBay
jane fonda urinal cake - Google Search
Those "dope addled hippie friends" turned out to be right in their assessment of the warActually, Jane was raised as Hollywood royaltyFonda's biggest fault was she could not separate the soldier from the war
She was your typical shallow fashion victim. She has no genuine principles, like most Burb Brats suffering from affluence, and that goes for both left and right wing fashion victims. Nothing is ever real to them, just media moments and they move on, like little birds with no attention spans, to the next Thing of the Moment. She was nothing special, and certainly not in the same league with vermin like Kerry, Hillary, Bill, and Obama by a long shot.
The charge of 'treason' is problematic, since no declaration of war was ever issued, one of my pet peeves over VN, and a huge mistake. Besides, we hardly had any troops left by the end of 1972. I can find far worse than Fonda, when it comes to real treason. She's irrelevant, and still is. She had a couple of good roles, owing to excellent direction and writing, that's about it. People still obsessing over her need to get a fricking life. Seriously.
Parts just fell into her lap because Henry Fonda was her father
Easiest thing would be just to wrap herself in the flag, support the war and let the money flow in. That is what most in Hollywood did
Instead, she risked it all. Fought against an unjustifiable war. Called out the military industrial complex. Helped end a war before it took more lives
lol rubbish, she just went along with her dope addled hippie friends, mostly other Burb Brat rich kids, here peer group. She didn't help anything, she just attention whored for herself, is all. She still does. She never risked anything.
Irrelevant to the absolute and irrefutable fact that Fonda committed treason, which endears her to gutter scum like you.
There is no reconciliation with you Maoists. You are the sworn enemy of the United States. We will utterly defeat you as we did last time you rose up in civil war, or you will defeat us and end this nation once and for all.
You are not the opposition, you are the enemy. You are far more dangerous than Hitler or Mussolini and must be treated as they were.
Those "dope addled hippie friends" turned out to be right in their assessment of the warActually, Jane was raised as Hollywood royaltyFonda's biggest fault was she could not separate the soldier from the war
She was your typical shallow fashion victim. She has no genuine principles, like most Burb Brats suffering from affluence, and that goes for both left and right wing fashion victims. Nothing is ever real to them, just media moments and they move on, like little birds with no attention spans, to the next Thing of the Moment. She was nothing special, and certainly not in the same league with vermin like Kerry, Hillary, Bill, and Obama by a long shot.
The charge of 'treason' is problematic, since no declaration of war was ever issued, one of my pet peeves over VN, and a huge mistake. Besides, we hardly had any troops left by the end of 1972. I can find far worse than Fonda, when it comes to real treason. She's irrelevant, and still is. She had a couple of good roles, owing to excellent direction and writing, that's about it. People still obsessing over her need to get a fricking life. Seriously.
Parts just fell into her lap because Henry Fonda was her father
Easiest thing would be just to wrap herself in the flag, support the war and let the money flow in. That is what most in Hollywood did
Instead, she risked it all. Fought against an unjustifiable war. Called out the military industrial complex. Helped end a war before it took more lives
lol rubbish, she just went along with her dope addled hippie friends, mostly other Burb Brat rich kids, here peer group. She didn't help anything, she just attention whored for herself, is all. She still does. She never risked anything.
Irrelevant to the absolute and irrefutable fact that Fonda committed treason, which endears her to gutter scum like you.
There is no reconciliation with you Maoists. You are the sworn enemy of the United States. We will utterly defeat you as we did last time you rose up in civil war, or you will defeat us and end this nation once and for all.
You are not the opposition, you are the enemy. You are far more dangerous than Hitler or Mussolini and must be treated as they were.
That is a truly ridiculous statement.The burden of evil people is to be afraid to die. It is part of the punishment for living lives of evil.
So to be clear, Fonda did a photo shoot for reporters and then was blamed for what? The "optics" seen by the right were "treason?" Therefore she is an evil left-wing hippie.Actually, Jane was raised as Hollywood royaltyJane Fonda risked her career to end a senseless war
Her efforts, along with other protestors, put pressure on Washington to end a useless war. If allowed to continue unchallenged....the war probably would have gone on another ten years
That she did and it was a worthy cause, yet she crossed the line when she supported the North Vietnamese.
Even in groups such as the S.D.S.. there was a struggle between responsible liberals who wanted to keep the message focused on getting our boys home because they were dying unnecessarily and irresponsible leftist radicals who crossed the same line as Fonda. What Fonda did was to give the impression that all those against the war were sympathizing with the North Vietnamese, which wasn't the case.
Fonda's biggest fault was she could not separate the soldier from the war
She was your typical shallow fashion victim. She has no genuine principles, like most Burb Brats suffering from affluence, and that goes for both left and right wing fashion victims. Nothing is ever real to them, just media moments and they move on, like little birds with no attention spans, to the next Thing of the Moment. She was nothing special, and certainly not in the same league with vermin like Kerry, Hillary, Bill, and Obama by a long shot.
The charge of 'treason' is problematic, since no declaration of war was ever issued, one of my pet peeves over VN, and a huge mistake. Besides, we hardly had any troops left by the end of 1972. I can find far worse than Fonda, when it comes to real treason. She's irrelevant, and still is. She had a couple of good roles, owing to excellent direction and writing, that's about it. People still obsessing over her need to get a fricking life. Seriously.
Parts just fell into her lap because Henry Fonda was her father
Easiest thing would be just to wrap herself in the flag, support the war and let the money flow in. That is what most in Hollywood did
Instead, she risked it all. Fought against an unjustifiable war. Called out the military industrial complex. Helped end a war before it took more lives
lol rubbish, she just went along with her dope addled hippie friends, mostly other Burb Brat rich kids, here peer group. She didn't help anything, she just attention whored for herself, is all. She still does. She never risked anything.
When did America have free markets?If you're going to be president might as well be the best.Perhaps the reason Fonda was never charged with treason or other crime, may be because of the publicity and citizen controversy that it would arouse. not something the Republicans wanted at the time? To get people thinking about that war and the arguments pro and con might have been a loser for them.
So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
MacArthur never said classical liberalism just liberalism. Course he was a government school graduate and a conservative, so knew little. Good thing he wasn't elected president.If you're going to be president might as well be the best.Perhaps the reason Fonda was never charged with treason or other crime, may be because of the publicity and citizen controversy that it would arouse. not something the Republicans wanted at the time? To get people thinking about that war and the arguments pro and con might have been a loser for them.
So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
It's always amusing to see someone "define" their opponents in a negative way, especially when they quote people who agree with them and stand in stark opposition to "the other team." Perhaps we would all be better if we defined ourselves and not others. - me (lol)If you're going to be president might as well be the best.Perhaps the reason Fonda was never charged with treason or other crime, may be because of the publicity and citizen controversy that it would arouse. not something the Republicans wanted at the time? To get people thinking about that war and the arguments pro and con might have been a loser for them.
So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
It's always amusing to see someone "define" their opponents in a negative way, especially when they quote people who agree with them and stand in stark opposition to "the other team." Perhaps we would all be better if we defined ourselves and not others. - me (lol)If you're going to be president might as well be the best.Perhaps the reason Fonda was never charged with treason or other crime, may be because of the publicity and citizen controversy that it would arouse. not something the Republicans wanted at the time? To get people thinking about that war and the arguments pro and con might have been a loser for them.
So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
It's always amusing to see someone "define" their opponents in a negative way, especially when they quote people who agree with them and stand in stark opposition to "the other team." Perhaps we would all be better if we defined ourselves and not others. - me (lol)If you're going to be president might as well be the best.Perhaps the reason Fonda was never charged with treason or other crime, may be because of the publicity and citizen controversy that it would arouse. not something the Republicans wanted at the time? To get people thinking about that war and the arguments pro and con might have been a loser for them.
So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
Clearly you could find no way to dispute my post.
Perhaps you're a moron.
Could be?
It's always amusing to see someone "define" their opponents in a negative way, especially when they quote people who agree with them and stand in stark opposition to "the other team." Perhaps we would all be better if we defined ourselves and not others. - me (lol)If you're going to be president might as well be the best.Perhaps the reason Fonda was never charged with treason or other crime, may be because of the publicity and citizen controversy that it would arouse. not something the Republicans wanted at the time? To get people thinking about that war and the arguments pro and con might have been a loser for them.
So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
Clearly you could find no way to dispute my post.
Perhaps you're a moron.
Could be?
It's always amusing to see someone "define" their opponents in a negative way, especially when they quote people who agree with them and stand in stark opposition to "the other team." Perhaps we would all be better if we defined ourselves and not others. - me (lol)If you're going to be president might as well be the best.So, you feel that communist.....er, government ....school has been successful in its purpose?
Franklin Roosevelt must be quite happy with himself, huh?
Hard to believe that West Point, Annapolis, Coast Guard and Air Force Academy are communist. But you're never wrong. Of course, it was West Point graduate, MacArthur, that said the nation was founded on liberalism.
Gads, you're a dunce.
Classical liberalism, not the tyranny that now calls itself 'liberal.'
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
The nation, with a view to classical liberalism, was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these embrace that view:
Nazism
Progressivism
Modern liberalism
Communism
Fascsm
or
Socialism
Jot that down.
Clearly you could find no way to dispute my post.
Perhaps you're a moron.
Could be?
So your "argument" is to call me names like a child on a schoolyard? I disputed the FACT that you feel entitled to "define" others opinions based upon your own bias, and using quotes by only those who agree with you.
Hey, let me try. Conservatism is defined as racism. Clearly, I wrote it so it must be true. See how that works?
Your comments bring nothing but hatred to anyone who does not hold the exact same opinions as yourself. It's simply childish behavior - nothing more.
